Cargando…
The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies
It takes on average 6–12 years to develop new anticancer drugs from discovery to approval. Effective new agents prolong survival. To demonstrate the importance of rapid drug approval, we calculated life‐years potentially saved if selected agents were approved more rapidly. As illustrative examples,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29601671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1454 |
_version_ | 1783321624547688448 |
---|---|
author | Stewart, David J. Stewart, Andrew A. Wheatley‐Price, Paul Batist, Gerald Kantarjian, Hagop M. Schiller, Joan Clemons, Mark Bradford, John‐Peter Gillespie, Laurel Kurzrock, Razelle |
author_facet | Stewart, David J. Stewart, Andrew A. Wheatley‐Price, Paul Batist, Gerald Kantarjian, Hagop M. Schiller, Joan Clemons, Mark Bradford, John‐Peter Gillespie, Laurel Kurzrock, Razelle |
author_sort | Stewart, David J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | It takes on average 6–12 years to develop new anticancer drugs from discovery to approval. Effective new agents prolong survival. To demonstrate the importance of rapid drug approval, we calculated life‐years potentially saved if selected agents were approved more rapidly. As illustrative examples, we used 27 trials documenting improvements in survival. We multiplied improvement in median survival by numbers of patients dying annually and multiplied this by number of years from drug discovery until approval. For every year by which time to drug approval could have been shortened, there would have been a median number of life‐years potentially saved of 79,920 worldwide per drug. Median number of life‐years lost between time of drug discovery and approval was 1,020,900 per example. If we were able to use available opportunities to decrease the time required to take a drug from discovery to approval to 5 years, the median number of life‐years saved per example would have been 523,890 worldwide. Various publications have identified opportunities to speed drug development without sacrificing patient safety. While many investigational drugs prove to be ineffective, some significantly prolong survival and/or reduce suffering. These illustrative examples suggest that a substantial number of life‐years could potentially be saved by increasing the efficiency of development of new drugs for advanced malignancies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5943431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59434312018-05-14 The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies Stewart, David J. Stewart, Andrew A. Wheatley‐Price, Paul Batist, Gerald Kantarjian, Hagop M. Schiller, Joan Clemons, Mark Bradford, John‐Peter Gillespie, Laurel Kurzrock, Razelle Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research It takes on average 6–12 years to develop new anticancer drugs from discovery to approval. Effective new agents prolong survival. To demonstrate the importance of rapid drug approval, we calculated life‐years potentially saved if selected agents were approved more rapidly. As illustrative examples, we used 27 trials documenting improvements in survival. We multiplied improvement in median survival by numbers of patients dying annually and multiplied this by number of years from drug discovery until approval. For every year by which time to drug approval could have been shortened, there would have been a median number of life‐years potentially saved of 79,920 worldwide per drug. Median number of life‐years lost between time of drug discovery and approval was 1,020,900 per example. If we were able to use available opportunities to decrease the time required to take a drug from discovery to approval to 5 years, the median number of life‐years saved per example would have been 523,890 worldwide. Various publications have identified opportunities to speed drug development without sacrificing patient safety. While many investigational drugs prove to be ineffective, some significantly prolong survival and/or reduce suffering. These illustrative examples suggest that a substantial number of life‐years could potentially be saved by increasing the efficiency of development of new drugs for advanced malignancies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5943431/ /pubmed/29601671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1454 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Stewart, David J. Stewart, Andrew A. Wheatley‐Price, Paul Batist, Gerald Kantarjian, Hagop M. Schiller, Joan Clemons, Mark Bradford, John‐Peter Gillespie, Laurel Kurzrock, Razelle The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies |
title | The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies |
title_full | The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies |
title_fullStr | The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies |
title_short | The importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies |
title_sort | importance of greater speed in drug development for advanced malignancies |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29601671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stewartdavidj theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT stewartandrewa theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT wheatleypricepaul theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT batistgerald theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT kantarjianhagopm theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT schillerjoan theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT clemonsmark theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT bradfordjohnpeter theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT gillespielaurel theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT kurzrockrazelle theimportanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT stewartdavidj importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT stewartandrewa importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT wheatleypricepaul importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT batistgerald importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT kantarjianhagopm importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT schillerjoan importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT clemonsmark importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT bradfordjohnpeter importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT gillespielaurel importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies AT kurzrockrazelle importanceofgreaterspeedindrugdevelopmentforadvancedmalignancies |