Cargando…
Multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies
BACKGROUND: Reducing the reading time of capsule endoscopy films is of high priority for gastroenterologists. We report a prospective multicenter evaluation of an “express view” reading mode (Intromedic capsule system). METHODS: Eighty-three patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29756020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0587-4788 |
_version_ | 1783321680804839424 |
---|---|
author | Saurin, Jean-Christophe Jacob, Philippe Heyries, Laurent Pesanti, Christian Cholet, Franck Fassler, Isaac Boulant, James Bramli, Slim De Leusse, Antoin Rahmi, Gabriel |
author_facet | Saurin, Jean-Christophe Jacob, Philippe Heyries, Laurent Pesanti, Christian Cholet, Franck Fassler, Isaac Boulant, James Bramli, Slim De Leusse, Antoin Rahmi, Gabriel |
author_sort | Saurin, Jean-Christophe |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reducing the reading time of capsule endoscopy films is of high priority for gastroenterologists. We report a prospective multicenter evaluation of an “express view” reading mode (Intromedic capsule system). METHODS: Eighty-three patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were prospectively included in 10 centers. All patients underwent small-bowel capsule endoscopy (Intromedic, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Films were read in standard mode, then a second reading was performed in express view mode at a second center. For each lesion, the precise location, nature, and relevance were collected. A consensus reading and review were done by three experts, and considered to be the gold standard. RESULTS: The mean reading time of capsule films was 39.7 minutes (11 – 180 minutes) and 19.7 minutes (4 – 40 minutes) by standard and express view mode, respectively ( P < 1 × 10 ( – 4) ). The consensus review identified a significant lesion in 44/83 patients (53.0 %). Standard reading and express view reading had a 93.3 % and 82.2 % sensitivity, respectively (NS). Consensus review identified 70 significant images from which standard reading and express view reading detected 58 (82.9 %) and 55 (78.6 %), respectively. The informatics algorithm detected 66/70 images (94.3 %) thus missing four small-bowel angiodysplasia. CONCLUSION: The express view algorithm allows an important shortening of Intromedic capsule film reading time with a high sensitivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5943700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59437002018-05-11 Multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies Saurin, Jean-Christophe Jacob, Philippe Heyries, Laurent Pesanti, Christian Cholet, Franck Fassler, Isaac Boulant, James Bramli, Slim De Leusse, Antoin Rahmi, Gabriel Endosc Int Open BACKGROUND: Reducing the reading time of capsule endoscopy films is of high priority for gastroenterologists. We report a prospective multicenter evaluation of an “express view” reading mode (Intromedic capsule system). METHODS: Eighty-three patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding were prospectively included in 10 centers. All patients underwent small-bowel capsule endoscopy (Intromedic, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Films were read in standard mode, then a second reading was performed in express view mode at a second center. For each lesion, the precise location, nature, and relevance were collected. A consensus reading and review were done by three experts, and considered to be the gold standard. RESULTS: The mean reading time of capsule films was 39.7 minutes (11 – 180 minutes) and 19.7 minutes (4 – 40 minutes) by standard and express view mode, respectively ( P < 1 × 10 ( – 4) ). The consensus review identified a significant lesion in 44/83 patients (53.0 %). Standard reading and express view reading had a 93.3 % and 82.2 % sensitivity, respectively (NS). Consensus review identified 70 significant images from which standard reading and express view reading detected 58 (82.9 %) and 55 (78.6 %), respectively. The informatics algorithm detected 66/70 images (94.3 %) thus missing four small-bowel angiodysplasia. CONCLUSION: The express view algorithm allows an important shortening of Intromedic capsule film reading time with a high sensitivity. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-05 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5943700/ /pubmed/29756020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0587-4788 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Saurin, Jean-Christophe Jacob, Philippe Heyries, Laurent Pesanti, Christian Cholet, Franck Fassler, Isaac Boulant, James Bramli, Slim De Leusse, Antoin Rahmi, Gabriel Multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies |
title | Multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies |
title_full | Multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies |
title_fullStr | Multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies |
title_short | Multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies |
title_sort | multicenter prospective evaluation of the express view reading mode for small-bowel capsule endoscopy studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29756020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0587-4788 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saurinjeanchristophe multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT jacobphilippe multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT heyrieslaurent multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT pesantichristian multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT choletfranck multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT fasslerisaac multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT boulantjames multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT bramlislim multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT deleusseantoin multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT rahmigabriel multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies AT multicenterprospectiveevaluationoftheexpressviewreadingmodeforsmallbowelcapsuleendoscopystudies |