Cargando…

Evidence supports blind screening for internal malignancy in dermatomyositis: Data from 2 large US dermatology cohorts

The association between dermatomyositis and internal malignancy is well established, but there is little consensus about the methods of cancer screening that should be utilized. We wished to analyze the prevalence and yield of selected cancer screening modalities in patients with dermatomyositis. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leatham, Hayley, Schadt, Courtney, Chisolm, Sarah, Fretwell, Deborah, Chung, Lorinda, Callen, Jeffrey P., Fiorentino, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29480875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009639
_version_ 1783321714133827584
author Leatham, Hayley
Schadt, Courtney
Chisolm, Sarah
Fretwell, Deborah
Chung, Lorinda
Callen, Jeffrey P.
Fiorentino, David
author_facet Leatham, Hayley
Schadt, Courtney
Chisolm, Sarah
Fretwell, Deborah
Chung, Lorinda
Callen, Jeffrey P.
Fiorentino, David
author_sort Leatham, Hayley
collection PubMed
description The association between dermatomyositis and internal malignancy is well established, but there is little consensus about the methods of cancer screening that should be utilized. We wished to analyze the prevalence and yield of selected cancer screening modalities in patients with dermatomyositis. We performed a retrospective analysis of 2 large US dermatomyositis cohorts comprising 400 patients. We measured the frequency of selected screening tests used to search for malignancy. Patients with a biopsy-confirmed malignancy were identified. Prespecified clinical and laboratory factors were tested for association with malignancy. For each malignancy we identified the screening test(s) that led to diagnosis and classified these tests as either blind (not guided by suspicious sign/symptom) or triggered (by a suspicious sign or symptom). Forty-eight patients (12.0% of total cohort) with 53 cancers were identified with dermatomyositis-associated malignancy. Twenty-one of these 53 cancers (40%) were diagnosed within 1 year of dermatomyositis symptom onset. In multivariate analysis, older age (P = .0005) was the only significant risk factor for internal malignancy. There was no significant difference in cancer incidence between classic and clinically amyopathic patients. Twenty-seven patients (6.8% of the total cohort) harbored an undiagnosed malignancy at the time of dermatomyositis diagnosis. The majority (59%) of these cancers were asymptomatic and computed tomography (CT) scans were the most common studies to reveal a cancer. This is the largest US cohort studied to examine malignancy prevalence and screening practices in dermatomyositis patients. Our results demonstrate that, while undiagnosed malignancy is present in <10% of US patients at the time of dermatomyositis onset, it is often not associated with a suspicious sign or symptom. Our data suggest that effective malignancy screening of dermatomyositis patients often requires evaluation beyond a history, physical examination, and “age-appropriate” cancer screening—these data may help to inform future guidelines for malignancy screening in this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5943873
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59438732018-05-15 Evidence supports blind screening for internal malignancy in dermatomyositis: Data from 2 large US dermatology cohorts Leatham, Hayley Schadt, Courtney Chisolm, Sarah Fretwell, Deborah Chung, Lorinda Callen, Jeffrey P. Fiorentino, David Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article The association between dermatomyositis and internal malignancy is well established, but there is little consensus about the methods of cancer screening that should be utilized. We wished to analyze the prevalence and yield of selected cancer screening modalities in patients with dermatomyositis. We performed a retrospective analysis of 2 large US dermatomyositis cohorts comprising 400 patients. We measured the frequency of selected screening tests used to search for malignancy. Patients with a biopsy-confirmed malignancy were identified. Prespecified clinical and laboratory factors were tested for association with malignancy. For each malignancy we identified the screening test(s) that led to diagnosis and classified these tests as either blind (not guided by suspicious sign/symptom) or triggered (by a suspicious sign or symptom). Forty-eight patients (12.0% of total cohort) with 53 cancers were identified with dermatomyositis-associated malignancy. Twenty-one of these 53 cancers (40%) were diagnosed within 1 year of dermatomyositis symptom onset. In multivariate analysis, older age (P = .0005) was the only significant risk factor for internal malignancy. There was no significant difference in cancer incidence between classic and clinically amyopathic patients. Twenty-seven patients (6.8% of the total cohort) harbored an undiagnosed malignancy at the time of dermatomyositis diagnosis. The majority (59%) of these cancers were asymptomatic and computed tomography (CT) scans were the most common studies to reveal a cancer. This is the largest US cohort studied to examine malignancy prevalence and screening practices in dermatomyositis patients. Our results demonstrate that, while undiagnosed malignancy is present in <10% of US patients at the time of dermatomyositis onset, it is often not associated with a suspicious sign or symptom. Our data suggest that effective malignancy screening of dermatomyositis patients often requires evaluation beyond a history, physical examination, and “age-appropriate” cancer screening—these data may help to inform future guidelines for malignancy screening in this population. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5943873/ /pubmed/29480875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009639 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Leatham, Hayley
Schadt, Courtney
Chisolm, Sarah
Fretwell, Deborah
Chung, Lorinda
Callen, Jeffrey P.
Fiorentino, David
Evidence supports blind screening for internal malignancy in dermatomyositis: Data from 2 large US dermatology cohorts
title Evidence supports blind screening for internal malignancy in dermatomyositis: Data from 2 large US dermatology cohorts
title_full Evidence supports blind screening for internal malignancy in dermatomyositis: Data from 2 large US dermatology cohorts
title_fullStr Evidence supports blind screening for internal malignancy in dermatomyositis: Data from 2 large US dermatology cohorts
title_full_unstemmed Evidence supports blind screening for internal malignancy in dermatomyositis: Data from 2 large US dermatology cohorts
title_short Evidence supports blind screening for internal malignancy in dermatomyositis: Data from 2 large US dermatology cohorts
title_sort evidence supports blind screening for internal malignancy in dermatomyositis: data from 2 large us dermatology cohorts
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5943873/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29480875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009639
work_keys_str_mv AT leathamhayley evidencesupportsblindscreeningforinternalmalignancyindermatomyositisdatafrom2largeusdermatologycohorts
AT schadtcourtney evidencesupportsblindscreeningforinternalmalignancyindermatomyositisdatafrom2largeusdermatologycohorts
AT chisolmsarah evidencesupportsblindscreeningforinternalmalignancyindermatomyositisdatafrom2largeusdermatologycohorts
AT fretwelldeborah evidencesupportsblindscreeningforinternalmalignancyindermatomyositisdatafrom2largeusdermatologycohorts
AT chunglorinda evidencesupportsblindscreeningforinternalmalignancyindermatomyositisdatafrom2largeusdermatologycohorts
AT callenjeffreyp evidencesupportsblindscreeningforinternalmalignancyindermatomyositisdatafrom2largeusdermatologycohorts
AT fiorentinodavid evidencesupportsblindscreeningforinternalmalignancyindermatomyositisdatafrom2largeusdermatologycohorts