Cargando…

Competition between Li(+) and Na(+) in sodium transporters and receptors: Which Na(+)-Binding sites are “therapeutic” Li(+) targets?

Sodium (Na(+)) acts as an indispensable allosteric regulator of the activities of biologically important neurotransmitter transporters and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which comprise well-known drug targets for psychiatric disorders and addictive behavior. How selective these allosteric Na(+...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudev, Todor, Mazmanian, Karine, Lim, Carmay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc05284g
_version_ 1783321796195385344
author Dudev, Todor
Mazmanian, Karine
Lim, Carmay
author_facet Dudev, Todor
Mazmanian, Karine
Lim, Carmay
author_sort Dudev, Todor
collection PubMed
description Sodium (Na(+)) acts as an indispensable allosteric regulator of the activities of biologically important neurotransmitter transporters and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which comprise well-known drug targets for psychiatric disorders and addictive behavior. How selective these allosteric Na(+)-binding sites are for the cognate cation over abiogenic Li(+), a first-line drug to treat bipolar disorder, is unclear. Here, we reveal how properties of the host protein and its binding cavity affect the outcome of the competition between Li(+) and Na(+) for allosteric binding sites in sodium transporters and receptors. We show that rigid Na(+)-sites that are crowded with multiple protein ligands are well-protected against Li(+) attack, but their flexible counterparts or buried Na(+)-sites containing only one or two protein ligands are vulnerable to Li(+) substitution. These findings suggest a novel possible mode of Li(+) therapeutic action: By displacing Na(+) bound by ≤2 protein ligands in buried GPCR sites and stabilizing the receptor's inactive state, Li(+) could prohibit conformational changes to an active state, leading to lower cytosolic levels of activated guanine nucleotide-binding proteins, which are hyperactive/overexpressed in bipolar disorder patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5944251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59442512018-05-18 Competition between Li(+) and Na(+) in sodium transporters and receptors: Which Na(+)-Binding sites are “therapeutic” Li(+) targets? Dudev, Todor Mazmanian, Karine Lim, Carmay Chem Sci Chemistry Sodium (Na(+)) acts as an indispensable allosteric regulator of the activities of biologically important neurotransmitter transporters and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which comprise well-known drug targets for psychiatric disorders and addictive behavior. How selective these allosteric Na(+)-binding sites are for the cognate cation over abiogenic Li(+), a first-line drug to treat bipolar disorder, is unclear. Here, we reveal how properties of the host protein and its binding cavity affect the outcome of the competition between Li(+) and Na(+) for allosteric binding sites in sodium transporters and receptors. We show that rigid Na(+)-sites that are crowded with multiple protein ligands are well-protected against Li(+) attack, but their flexible counterparts or buried Na(+)-sites containing only one or two protein ligands are vulnerable to Li(+) substitution. These findings suggest a novel possible mode of Li(+) therapeutic action: By displacing Na(+) bound by ≤2 protein ligands in buried GPCR sites and stabilizing the receptor's inactive state, Li(+) could prohibit conformational changes to an active state, leading to lower cytosolic levels of activated guanine nucleotide-binding proteins, which are hyperactive/overexpressed in bipolar disorder patients. Royal Society of Chemistry 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5944251/ /pubmed/29780538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc05284g Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is freely available. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence (CC BY 3.0)
spellingShingle Chemistry
Dudev, Todor
Mazmanian, Karine
Lim, Carmay
Competition between Li(+) and Na(+) in sodium transporters and receptors: Which Na(+)-Binding sites are “therapeutic” Li(+) targets?
title Competition between Li(+) and Na(+) in sodium transporters and receptors: Which Na(+)-Binding sites are “therapeutic” Li(+) targets?
title_full Competition between Li(+) and Na(+) in sodium transporters and receptors: Which Na(+)-Binding sites are “therapeutic” Li(+) targets?
title_fullStr Competition between Li(+) and Na(+) in sodium transporters and receptors: Which Na(+)-Binding sites are “therapeutic” Li(+) targets?
title_full_unstemmed Competition between Li(+) and Na(+) in sodium transporters and receptors: Which Na(+)-Binding sites are “therapeutic” Li(+) targets?
title_short Competition between Li(+) and Na(+) in sodium transporters and receptors: Which Na(+)-Binding sites are “therapeutic” Li(+) targets?
title_sort competition between li(+) and na(+) in sodium transporters and receptors: which na(+)-binding sites are “therapeutic” li(+) targets?
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc05284g
work_keys_str_mv AT dudevtodor competitionbetweenliandnainsodiumtransportersandreceptorswhichnabindingsitesaretherapeuticlitargets
AT mazmaniankarine competitionbetweenliandnainsodiumtransportersandreceptorswhichnabindingsitesaretherapeuticlitargets
AT limcarmay competitionbetweenliandnainsodiumtransportersandreceptorswhichnabindingsitesaretherapeuticlitargets