Cargando…

A survey of the views and capabilities of community pharmacists in Western Australia regarding the rescheduling of selected oral antibiotics in a framework of pharmacist prescribing

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic misuse in the community contributes to antimicrobial resistance. One way to address this may be by better utilizing community pharmacists’ skills in antibiotic prescribing. The aims of this study were to examine the level of support for “down-scheduling” selected antibiotics a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinkala, Fatima, Parsons, Richard, Sunderland, Bruce, Hoti, Kreshnik, Czarniak, Petra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761047
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4726
_version_ 1783321824429342720
author Sinkala, Fatima
Parsons, Richard
Sunderland, Bruce
Hoti, Kreshnik
Czarniak, Petra
author_facet Sinkala, Fatima
Parsons, Richard
Sunderland, Bruce
Hoti, Kreshnik
Czarniak, Petra
author_sort Sinkala, Fatima
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibiotic misuse in the community contributes to antimicrobial resistance. One way to address this may be by better utilizing community pharmacists’ skills in antibiotic prescribing. The aims of this study were to examine the level of support for “down-scheduling” selected antibiotics and to evaluate factors determining the appropriateness of community pharmacist prescribing for a limited range of infections, including their decision to refer to a doctor. METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires, including graded case vignette scenarios simulating real practice, were sent to Western Australian community pharmacists. In addition to descriptive statistics and chi-square testing, a General Estimating Equation (GEE) was used to identify factors associated with appropriateness of therapy and the decision to refer, for each of the seven vignettes. RESULTS: Of the 240 pharmacists surveyed, 90 (37.5%) responded, yielding 630 responses to seven different case vignettes. There was more than 60% respondent support for expanded prescribing (rescheduling) of commonly prescribed antibiotics. Overall 426/630 (67.6%) chose to treat the patient while the remaining 204/630 (32.4%) referred the patient to a doctor. Of those electing to treat, 380/426 (89.2%) opted to use oral antibiotics, with 293/380 (77.2%) treating with an appropriate selection and regimen. The GEE model indicated that pharmacists were more likely to prescribe inappropriately for conditions such as otitis media (p = 0.0060) and urinary tract infection in pregnancy (p < 0.0001) compared to more complex conditions. Over 80% of all pharmacists would refer the patient to a doctor following no improvement within 3 days, or within 24 h in the case of community acquired pneumonia. It was more common for younger pharmacists to refer the patient to a doctor (p = 0.0165). DISCUSSION: This study adds further insight into community pharmacy/pharmacist characteristics associated with appropriateness of oral antibiotic selection and the decision to refer to doctors. These findings require consideration in designing pharmacist over-the-counter prescribing models for oral antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5944433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59444332018-05-14 A survey of the views and capabilities of community pharmacists in Western Australia regarding the rescheduling of selected oral antibiotics in a framework of pharmacist prescribing Sinkala, Fatima Parsons, Richard Sunderland, Bruce Hoti, Kreshnik Czarniak, Petra PeerJ Health Policy BACKGROUND: Antibiotic misuse in the community contributes to antimicrobial resistance. One way to address this may be by better utilizing community pharmacists’ skills in antibiotic prescribing. The aims of this study were to examine the level of support for “down-scheduling” selected antibiotics and to evaluate factors determining the appropriateness of community pharmacist prescribing for a limited range of infections, including their decision to refer to a doctor. METHODS: Self-administered questionnaires, including graded case vignette scenarios simulating real practice, were sent to Western Australian community pharmacists. In addition to descriptive statistics and chi-square testing, a General Estimating Equation (GEE) was used to identify factors associated with appropriateness of therapy and the decision to refer, for each of the seven vignettes. RESULTS: Of the 240 pharmacists surveyed, 90 (37.5%) responded, yielding 630 responses to seven different case vignettes. There was more than 60% respondent support for expanded prescribing (rescheduling) of commonly prescribed antibiotics. Overall 426/630 (67.6%) chose to treat the patient while the remaining 204/630 (32.4%) referred the patient to a doctor. Of those electing to treat, 380/426 (89.2%) opted to use oral antibiotics, with 293/380 (77.2%) treating with an appropriate selection and regimen. The GEE model indicated that pharmacists were more likely to prescribe inappropriately for conditions such as otitis media (p = 0.0060) and urinary tract infection in pregnancy (p < 0.0001) compared to more complex conditions. Over 80% of all pharmacists would refer the patient to a doctor following no improvement within 3 days, or within 24 h in the case of community acquired pneumonia. It was more common for younger pharmacists to refer the patient to a doctor (p = 0.0165). DISCUSSION: This study adds further insight into community pharmacy/pharmacist characteristics associated with appropriateness of oral antibiotic selection and the decision to refer to doctors. These findings require consideration in designing pharmacist over-the-counter prescribing models for oral antibiotics. PeerJ Inc. 2018-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5944433/ /pubmed/29761047 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4726 Text en ©2018 Sinkala et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Sinkala, Fatima
Parsons, Richard
Sunderland, Bruce
Hoti, Kreshnik
Czarniak, Petra
A survey of the views and capabilities of community pharmacists in Western Australia regarding the rescheduling of selected oral antibiotics in a framework of pharmacist prescribing
title A survey of the views and capabilities of community pharmacists in Western Australia regarding the rescheduling of selected oral antibiotics in a framework of pharmacist prescribing
title_full A survey of the views and capabilities of community pharmacists in Western Australia regarding the rescheduling of selected oral antibiotics in a framework of pharmacist prescribing
title_fullStr A survey of the views and capabilities of community pharmacists in Western Australia regarding the rescheduling of selected oral antibiotics in a framework of pharmacist prescribing
title_full_unstemmed A survey of the views and capabilities of community pharmacists in Western Australia regarding the rescheduling of selected oral antibiotics in a framework of pharmacist prescribing
title_short A survey of the views and capabilities of community pharmacists in Western Australia regarding the rescheduling of selected oral antibiotics in a framework of pharmacist prescribing
title_sort survey of the views and capabilities of community pharmacists in western australia regarding the rescheduling of selected oral antibiotics in a framework of pharmacist prescribing
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29761047
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4726
work_keys_str_mv AT sinkalafatima asurveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing
AT parsonsrichard asurveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing
AT sunderlandbruce asurveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing
AT hotikreshnik asurveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing
AT czarniakpetra asurveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing
AT sinkalafatima surveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing
AT parsonsrichard surveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing
AT sunderlandbruce surveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing
AT hotikreshnik surveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing
AT czarniakpetra surveyoftheviewsandcapabilitiesofcommunitypharmacistsinwesternaustraliaregardingthereschedulingofselectedoralantibioticsinaframeworkofpharmacistprescribing