Cargando…
Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
INTRODUCTION: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been considered as the first recommendation for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. A previous meta-analysis suggested that low volume PEG may improve the acceptability of ingesting bowel preparation solution. However, several limitations impaired the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010599 |
_version_ | 1783321847175053312 |
---|---|
author | Yi, Li-Juan Tian, Xu Pi, Yuan-Ping Feng, Ling Chen, Hui Liu, Xiao-Ling Chen, Wei-Qing |
author_facet | Yi, Li-Juan Tian, Xu Pi, Yuan-Ping Feng, Ling Chen, Hui Liu, Xiao-Ling Chen, Wei-Qing |
author_sort | Yi, Li-Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been considered as the first recommendation for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. A previous meta-analysis suggested that low volume PEG may improve the acceptability of ingesting bowel preparation solution. However, several limitations impaired the power of findings from this published meta-analysis, such as the variation in study design of included trials and adjuvant prescriptions. Moreover, some studies related to this topic have been published recently. And thus, the aim of this updated meta-analysis is to further assess the comparative efficacy of low volume versus standard volume of PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy with trial sequential analysis (TSA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic searches will be performed to capture any potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Moreover, we will also manually check the bibliographies of related studies and reviews so as to get additional studies. Two reviewers will independently screen the citation records, extract essential information, and appraise the risk of bias of each RCT in sequence. Finally, we will used the STATA software version 12.0 and TSA software version beta 0.9 to statistically analyze all data and test the robust of each pooled result, respectively. RESULTS: We will submit the full-text of systematic review to a peer-review journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This updated systematic review and meta-analysis with TSA will further assess the comparative efficacy and safety of low-volume versus traditional standard volume PEG for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. And then, a more comprehensive evidence body on low-volume compared to standard volume PEG in bowel preparation will be constructed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5944532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59445322018-05-15 Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis Yi, Li-Juan Tian, Xu Pi, Yuan-Ping Feng, Ling Chen, Hui Liu, Xiao-Ling Chen, Wei-Qing Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article INTRODUCTION: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) has been considered as the first recommendation for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. A previous meta-analysis suggested that low volume PEG may improve the acceptability of ingesting bowel preparation solution. However, several limitations impaired the power of findings from this published meta-analysis, such as the variation in study design of included trials and adjuvant prescriptions. Moreover, some studies related to this topic have been published recently. And thus, the aim of this updated meta-analysis is to further assess the comparative efficacy of low volume versus standard volume of PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy with trial sequential analysis (TSA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic searches will be performed to capture any potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Moreover, we will also manually check the bibliographies of related studies and reviews so as to get additional studies. Two reviewers will independently screen the citation records, extract essential information, and appraise the risk of bias of each RCT in sequence. Finally, we will used the STATA software version 12.0 and TSA software version beta 0.9 to statistically analyze all data and test the robust of each pooled result, respectively. RESULTS: We will submit the full-text of systematic review to a peer-review journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This updated systematic review and meta-analysis with TSA will further assess the comparative efficacy and safety of low-volume versus traditional standard volume PEG for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. And then, a more comprehensive evidence body on low-volume compared to standard volume PEG in bowel preparation will be constructed. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5944532/ /pubmed/29703060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010599 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yi, Li-Juan Tian, Xu Pi, Yuan-Ping Feng, Ling Chen, Hui Liu, Xiao-Ling Chen, Wei-Qing Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume PEG on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: Protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of low volume versus traditional standard volume peg on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: protocol for an updated meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010599 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yilijuan comparativeefficacyoflowvolumeversustraditionalstandardvolumepegonbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopyprotocolforanupdatedmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT tianxu comparativeefficacyoflowvolumeversustraditionalstandardvolumepegonbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopyprotocolforanupdatedmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT piyuanping comparativeefficacyoflowvolumeversustraditionalstandardvolumepegonbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopyprotocolforanupdatedmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT fengling comparativeefficacyoflowvolumeversustraditionalstandardvolumepegonbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopyprotocolforanupdatedmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT chenhui comparativeefficacyoflowvolumeversustraditionalstandardvolumepegonbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopyprotocolforanupdatedmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT liuxiaoling comparativeefficacyoflowvolumeversustraditionalstandardvolumepegonbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopyprotocolforanupdatedmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT chenweiqing comparativeefficacyoflowvolumeversustraditionalstandardvolumepegonbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopyprotocolforanupdatedmetaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis |