Cargando…
Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
BACKGROUND: Well-developed coronary collateral circulation usually results in fewer infarct size, improved cardiac function, and fewer mortality. Traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, and smoking) have some effects on coronary collateral circulation. However, the association bet...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29702990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010417 |
_version_ | 1783321853999185920 |
---|---|
author | Xing, Zhenhua Pei, Junyu Tang, Liang Hu, Xinqun |
author_facet | Xing, Zhenhua Pei, Junyu Tang, Liang Hu, Xinqun |
author_sort | Xing, Zhenhua |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Well-developed coronary collateral circulation usually results in fewer infarct size, improved cardiac function, and fewer mortality. Traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, and smoking) have some effects on coronary collateral circulation. However, the association between these risk factors and coronary collateral circulation are controversial. Given the confusing evidences regarding traditional cardiovascular risk factors on coronary collateral circulation, we performed this meta-analysis protocol to investigate the relationship between traditional risk factors of coronary artery disease and coronary collateral circulation. METHODS: MEDINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index will be searched to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes of this meta-analysis are well-developed coronary collateral circulation. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, smoking, hypertriton). Pooled ORs were computed as the Mantel–Haenszel-weighted average of the ORs for all included studies. Sensitivity analysis, quality assessment, publication bias analysis, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE) will be performed to ensure the reliability of our results. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of current evidence of traditional risk factors on collateral circulation. CONCLUSION: This conclusion of our systematic review and meta-analysis will provide evidence to judge whether traditional risk factors affects coronary collateral circulation. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required because our systematic review and meta-analysis will be based on published data without interventions on patients. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5944561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59445612018-05-15 Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies Xing, Zhenhua Pei, Junyu Tang, Liang Hu, Xinqun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Well-developed coronary collateral circulation usually results in fewer infarct size, improved cardiac function, and fewer mortality. Traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, and smoking) have some effects on coronary collateral circulation. However, the association between these risk factors and coronary collateral circulation are controversial. Given the confusing evidences regarding traditional cardiovascular risk factors on coronary collateral circulation, we performed this meta-analysis protocol to investigate the relationship between traditional risk factors of coronary artery disease and coronary collateral circulation. METHODS: MEDINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index will be searched to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes of this meta-analysis are well-developed coronary collateral circulation. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, smoking, hypertriton). Pooled ORs were computed as the Mantel–Haenszel-weighted average of the ORs for all included studies. Sensitivity analysis, quality assessment, publication bias analysis, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE) will be performed to ensure the reliability of our results. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of current evidence of traditional risk factors on collateral circulation. CONCLUSION: This conclusion of our systematic review and meta-analysis will provide evidence to judge whether traditional risk factors affects coronary collateral circulation. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required because our systematic review and meta-analysis will be based on published data without interventions on patients. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5944561/ /pubmed/29702990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010417 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xing, Zhenhua Pei, Junyu Tang, Liang Hu, Xinqun Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title | Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_full | Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_fullStr | Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_short | Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies |
title_sort | traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29702990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xingzhenhua traditionalcardiovascularriskfactorsandcoronarycollateralcirculationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies AT peijunyu traditionalcardiovascularriskfactorsandcoronarycollateralcirculationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies AT tangliang traditionalcardiovascularriskfactorsandcoronarycollateralcirculationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies AT huxinqun traditionalcardiovascularriskfactorsandcoronarycollateralcirculationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies |