Cargando…

Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies

BACKGROUND: Well-developed coronary collateral circulation usually results in fewer infarct size, improved cardiac function, and fewer mortality. Traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, and smoking) have some effects on coronary collateral circulation. However, the association bet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xing, Zhenhua, Pei, Junyu, Tang, Liang, Hu, Xinqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29702990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010417
_version_ 1783321853999185920
author Xing, Zhenhua
Pei, Junyu
Tang, Liang
Hu, Xinqun
author_facet Xing, Zhenhua
Pei, Junyu
Tang, Liang
Hu, Xinqun
author_sort Xing, Zhenhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Well-developed coronary collateral circulation usually results in fewer infarct size, improved cardiac function, and fewer mortality. Traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, and smoking) have some effects on coronary collateral circulation. However, the association between these risk factors and coronary collateral circulation are controversial. Given the confusing evidences regarding traditional cardiovascular risk factors on coronary collateral circulation, we performed this meta-analysis protocol to investigate the relationship between traditional risk factors of coronary artery disease and coronary collateral circulation. METHODS: MEDINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index will be searched to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes of this meta-analysis are well-developed coronary collateral circulation. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, smoking, hypertriton). Pooled ORs were computed as the Mantel–Haenszel-weighted average of the ORs for all included studies. Sensitivity analysis, quality assessment, publication bias analysis, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE) will be performed to ensure the reliability of our results. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of current evidence of traditional risk factors on collateral circulation. CONCLUSION: This conclusion of our systematic review and meta-analysis will provide evidence to judge whether traditional risk factors affects coronary collateral circulation. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required because our systematic review and meta-analysis will be based on published data without interventions on patients. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5944561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59445612018-05-15 Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies Xing, Zhenhua Pei, Junyu Tang, Liang Hu, Xinqun Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Well-developed coronary collateral circulation usually results in fewer infarct size, improved cardiac function, and fewer mortality. Traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, and smoking) have some effects on coronary collateral circulation. However, the association between these risk factors and coronary collateral circulation are controversial. Given the confusing evidences regarding traditional cardiovascular risk factors on coronary collateral circulation, we performed this meta-analysis protocol to investigate the relationship between traditional risk factors of coronary artery disease and coronary collateral circulation. METHODS: MEDINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index will be searched to identify relevant studies. The primary outcomes of this meta-analysis are well-developed coronary collateral circulation. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of traditional coronary risk factors (diabetes, smoking, hypertriton). Pooled ORs were computed as the Mantel–Haenszel-weighted average of the ORs for all included studies. Sensitivity analysis, quality assessment, publication bias analysis, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE) will be performed to ensure the reliability of our results. RESULTS: This study will provide a high-quality synthesis of current evidence of traditional risk factors on collateral circulation. CONCLUSION: This conclusion of our systematic review and meta-analysis will provide evidence to judge whether traditional risk factors affects coronary collateral circulation. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval is not required because our systematic review and meta-analysis will be based on published data without interventions on patients. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5944561/ /pubmed/29702990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010417 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Xing, Zhenhua
Pei, Junyu
Tang, Liang
Hu, Xinqun
Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
title Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
title_full Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
title_fullStr Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
title_full_unstemmed Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
title_short Traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
title_sort traditional cardiovascular risk factors and coronary collateral circulation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29702990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010417
work_keys_str_mv AT xingzhenhua traditionalcardiovascularriskfactorsandcoronarycollateralcirculationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies
AT peijunyu traditionalcardiovascularriskfactorsandcoronarycollateralcirculationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies
AT tangliang traditionalcardiovascularriskfactorsandcoronarycollateralcirculationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies
AT huxinqun traditionalcardiovascularriskfactorsandcoronarycollateralcirculationprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcasecontrolstudies