Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Cooled radiofrequency procedure is a novel minimally invasive surgical technique and has been occasionally utilized in managing chronic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Hui-Hui, Zhuang, Su-Yang, Hong, Xin, Xie, Xin-Hui, Zhu, Lei, Wu, Xiao-Tao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29419679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009809
_version_ 1783321868520914944
author Sun, Hui-Hui
Zhuang, Su-Yang
Hong, Xin
Xie, Xin-Hui
Zhu, Lei
Wu, Xiao-Tao
author_facet Sun, Hui-Hui
Zhuang, Su-Yang
Hong, Xin
Xie, Xin-Hui
Zhu, Lei
Wu, Xiao-Tao
author_sort Sun, Hui-Hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cooled radiofrequency procedure is a novel minimally invasive surgical technique and has been occasionally utilized in managing chronic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating patients with chronic SIJ pain in terms of pain and disability relief, patients’ satisfaction degree as well as complications. METHODS: Studies of using cooled radiofrequency procedure in managing SIJ pain were retrieved from Medline and Web of Science according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality evaluation was conducted using Cochrane collaboration tool for randomized controlled trials and MINORS quality assessment for noncomparative trials. Statistics were managed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Totally 7 studies with 240 eligible patients were enrolled. The overall pooled results demonstrated that pain intensity decreased significantly after cooled radiofrequency procedure compared with that measured before treatment. The mean difference (MD) was 3.81 [95% confidence intervals (95% CIs): 3.29–4.33, P < .001] and 3.78 (95% CIs: 3.31–4.25, P < .001) as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), respectively. Disability also relieved significantly after treatment compared with that measured before treatment. The MD was 18.2 (95% CIs: 12.22–24.17, P < .001) as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Seventy-two percent of the patients presented positive results as measured by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE). The OR was 0.01 (95% CIs: 0.00–0.05, P < .001). Only mild complications were observed in the 7 studies, including transient hip pain, soreness, and numbness. CONCLUSION: Cooled radiofrequency procedure can significantly relieve pain and disability with no severe complications, and majority of patients are satisfied with this technique. Thus, it is safe and effective to use this procedure in managing patients with chronic SIJ pain. More high-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to validate our findings. LIMITATIONS: The sample size of the included studies was small and various heterogeneity existed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5944663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59446632018-05-17 The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis Sun, Hui-Hui Zhuang, Su-Yang Hong, Xin Xie, Xin-Hui Zhu, Lei Wu, Xiao-Tao Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Cooled radiofrequency procedure is a novel minimally invasive surgical technique and has been occasionally utilized in managing chronic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain. A meta-analysis was conducted to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating patients with chronic SIJ pain in terms of pain and disability relief, patients’ satisfaction degree as well as complications. METHODS: Studies of using cooled radiofrequency procedure in managing SIJ pain were retrieved from Medline and Web of Science according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality evaluation was conducted using Cochrane collaboration tool for randomized controlled trials and MINORS quality assessment for noncomparative trials. Statistics were managed using Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Totally 7 studies with 240 eligible patients were enrolled. The overall pooled results demonstrated that pain intensity decreased significantly after cooled radiofrequency procedure compared with that measured before treatment. The mean difference (MD) was 3.81 [95% confidence intervals (95% CIs): 3.29–4.33, P < .001] and 3.78 (95% CIs: 3.31–4.25, P < .001) as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS), respectively. Disability also relieved significantly after treatment compared with that measured before treatment. The MD was 18.2 (95% CIs: 12.22–24.17, P < .001) as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Seventy-two percent of the patients presented positive results as measured by the Global Perceived Effect (GPE). The OR was 0.01 (95% CIs: 0.00–0.05, P < .001). Only mild complications were observed in the 7 studies, including transient hip pain, soreness, and numbness. CONCLUSION: Cooled radiofrequency procedure can significantly relieve pain and disability with no severe complications, and majority of patients are satisfied with this technique. Thus, it is safe and effective to use this procedure in managing patients with chronic SIJ pain. More high-quality and large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to validate our findings. LIMITATIONS: The sample size of the included studies was small and various heterogeneity existed. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5944663/ /pubmed/29419679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009809 Text en Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Sun, Hui-Hui
Zhuang, Su-Yang
Hong, Xin
Xie, Xin-Hui
Zhu, Lei
Wu, Xiao-Tao
The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a prisma-compliant meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29419679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009809
work_keys_str_mv AT sunhuihui theefficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT zhuangsuyang theefficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT hongxin theefficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT xiexinhui theefficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT zhulei theefficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT wuxiaotao theefficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT sunhuihui efficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT zhuangsuyang efficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT hongxin efficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT xiexinhui efficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT zhulei efficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT wuxiaotao efficacyandsafetyofusingcooledradiofrequencyintreatingchronicsacroiliacjointpainaprismacompliantmetaanalysis