Cargando…
Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether embryonic DNA isolated from blastocyst culture conditioned medium (BCCM) combined with blastocoel fluid (BF) could be used for blastocyst stage non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening, NIPGS)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29746572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197262 |
_version_ | 1783321919914770432 |
---|---|
author | Kuznyetsov, Valeriy Madjunkova, Svetlana Antes, Ran Abramov, Rina Motamedi, Gelareh Ibarrientos, Zenon Librach, Clifford |
author_facet | Kuznyetsov, Valeriy Madjunkova, Svetlana Antes, Ran Abramov, Rina Motamedi, Gelareh Ibarrientos, Zenon Librach, Clifford |
author_sort | Kuznyetsov, Valeriy |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess whether embryonic DNA isolated from blastocyst culture conditioned medium (BCCM) combined with blastocoel fluid (BF) could be used for blastocyst stage non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening, NIPGS). PATIENTS: 47 embryos from 35 patients undergoing IVF. INTERVENTIONS: DNA analysis of combined BCCM plus BF in comparison with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and/or whole blastocyst (WB)using next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Embryonic DNA was successfully amplified in 47/47 NIPGS samples (28 frozen-thawed and 19 fresh culture samples) ranging from 6.3 to 44.0 ng/μl. For frozen-thawed embryos, the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample was equivalent between NIPGS vs. TE biopsy, NIPGS vs. WB and TE vs. WB samples taken from the same embryo was 87.5%; 96.4% and 91.7% respectively (P>0.05), and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 99.3%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively (P>0.05). In fresh cases (Day 4 to Day 5/6 culture), the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample between NIPGS vs. TE samples taken from the same embryo was 100%, and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 98.2% (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of BCCM and BF contains sufficient embryonic DNA for whole genome amplification and accurate aneuploidy screening. Our findings suggest that aneuploidy screening using BCCM combined with BF could potentially serve as a novel NIPGS approach for use in human IVF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5944986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59449862018-05-25 Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach Kuznyetsov, Valeriy Madjunkova, Svetlana Antes, Ran Abramov, Rina Motamedi, Gelareh Ibarrientos, Zenon Librach, Clifford PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess whether embryonic DNA isolated from blastocyst culture conditioned medium (BCCM) combined with blastocoel fluid (BF) could be used for blastocyst stage non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening, NIPGS). PATIENTS: 47 embryos from 35 patients undergoing IVF. INTERVENTIONS: DNA analysis of combined BCCM plus BF in comparison with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and/or whole blastocyst (WB)using next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Embryonic DNA was successfully amplified in 47/47 NIPGS samples (28 frozen-thawed and 19 fresh culture samples) ranging from 6.3 to 44.0 ng/μl. For frozen-thawed embryos, the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample was equivalent between NIPGS vs. TE biopsy, NIPGS vs. WB and TE vs. WB samples taken from the same embryo was 87.5%; 96.4% and 91.7% respectively (P>0.05), and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 99.3%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively (P>0.05). In fresh cases (Day 4 to Day 5/6 culture), the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample between NIPGS vs. TE samples taken from the same embryo was 100%, and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 98.2% (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of BCCM and BF contains sufficient embryonic DNA for whole genome amplification and accurate aneuploidy screening. Our findings suggest that aneuploidy screening using BCCM combined with BF could potentially serve as a novel NIPGS approach for use in human IVF. Public Library of Science 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5944986/ /pubmed/29746572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197262 Text en © 2018 Kuznyetsov et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kuznyetsov, Valeriy Madjunkova, Svetlana Antes, Ran Abramov, Rina Motamedi, Gelareh Ibarrientos, Zenon Librach, Clifford Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach |
title | Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach |
title_full | Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach |
title_short | Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach |
title_sort | evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29746572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197262 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuznyetsovvaleriy evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach AT madjunkovasvetlana evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach AT antesran evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach AT abramovrina evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach AT motamedigelareh evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach AT ibarrientoszenon evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach AT librachclifford evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach |