Cargando…

Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether embryonic DNA isolated from blastocyst culture conditioned medium (BCCM) combined with blastocoel fluid (BF) could be used for blastocyst stage non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening, NIPGS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuznyetsov, Valeriy, Madjunkova, Svetlana, Antes, Ran, Abramov, Rina, Motamedi, Gelareh, Ibarrientos, Zenon, Librach, Clifford
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29746572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197262
_version_ 1783321919914770432
author Kuznyetsov, Valeriy
Madjunkova, Svetlana
Antes, Ran
Abramov, Rina
Motamedi, Gelareh
Ibarrientos, Zenon
Librach, Clifford
author_facet Kuznyetsov, Valeriy
Madjunkova, Svetlana
Antes, Ran
Abramov, Rina
Motamedi, Gelareh
Ibarrientos, Zenon
Librach, Clifford
author_sort Kuznyetsov, Valeriy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess whether embryonic DNA isolated from blastocyst culture conditioned medium (BCCM) combined with blastocoel fluid (BF) could be used for blastocyst stage non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening, NIPGS). PATIENTS: 47 embryos from 35 patients undergoing IVF. INTERVENTIONS: DNA analysis of combined BCCM plus BF in comparison with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and/or whole blastocyst (WB)using next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Embryonic DNA was successfully amplified in 47/47 NIPGS samples (28 frozen-thawed and 19 fresh culture samples) ranging from 6.3 to 44.0 ng/μl. For frozen-thawed embryos, the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample was equivalent between NIPGS vs. TE biopsy, NIPGS vs. WB and TE vs. WB samples taken from the same embryo was 87.5%; 96.4% and 91.7% respectively (P>0.05), and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 99.3%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively (P>0.05). In fresh cases (Day 4 to Day 5/6 culture), the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample between NIPGS vs. TE samples taken from the same embryo was 100%, and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 98.2% (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of BCCM and BF contains sufficient embryonic DNA for whole genome amplification and accurate aneuploidy screening. Our findings suggest that aneuploidy screening using BCCM combined with BF could potentially serve as a novel NIPGS approach for use in human IVF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5944986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59449862018-05-25 Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach Kuznyetsov, Valeriy Madjunkova, Svetlana Antes, Ran Abramov, Rina Motamedi, Gelareh Ibarrientos, Zenon Librach, Clifford PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To assess whether embryonic DNA isolated from blastocyst culture conditioned medium (BCCM) combined with blastocoel fluid (BF) could be used for blastocyst stage non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening, NIPGS). PATIENTS: 47 embryos from 35 patients undergoing IVF. INTERVENTIONS: DNA analysis of combined BCCM plus BF in comparison with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and/or whole blastocyst (WB)using next generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: Embryonic DNA was successfully amplified in 47/47 NIPGS samples (28 frozen-thawed and 19 fresh culture samples) ranging from 6.3 to 44.0 ng/μl. For frozen-thawed embryos, the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample was equivalent between NIPGS vs. TE biopsy, NIPGS vs. WB and TE vs. WB samples taken from the same embryo was 87.5%; 96.4% and 91.7% respectively (P>0.05), and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 99.3%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively (P>0.05). In fresh cases (Day 4 to Day 5/6 culture), the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample between NIPGS vs. TE samples taken from the same embryo was 100%, and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 98.2% (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of BCCM and BF contains sufficient embryonic DNA for whole genome amplification and accurate aneuploidy screening. Our findings suggest that aneuploidy screening using BCCM combined with BF could potentially serve as a novel NIPGS approach for use in human IVF. Public Library of Science 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5944986/ /pubmed/29746572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197262 Text en © 2018 Kuznyetsov et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kuznyetsov, Valeriy
Madjunkova, Svetlana
Antes, Ran
Abramov, Rina
Motamedi, Gelareh
Ibarrientos, Zenon
Librach, Clifford
Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach
title Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach
title_full Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach
title_fullStr Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach
title_short Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach
title_sort evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5944986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29746572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197262
work_keys_str_mv AT kuznyetsovvaleriy evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach
AT madjunkovasvetlana evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach
AT antesran evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach
AT abramovrina evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach
AT motamedigelareh evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach
AT ibarrientoszenon evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach
AT librachclifford evaluationofanovelnoninvasivepreimplantationgeneticscreeningapproach