Cargando…

Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision

Background: External supervision of primary health care facilities to monitor and improve services is common in low-income countries. Currently there are no tools to measure the quality of support in external supervision in these countries. Aim: To develop a provider-reported instrument to assess th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schriver, Michael, Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire, Vedsted, Peter, Besigye, Innocent, Kallestrup, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29547066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1445466
_version_ 1783321960338423808
author Schriver, Michael
Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire
Vedsted, Peter
Besigye, Innocent
Kallestrup, Per
author_facet Schriver, Michael
Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire
Vedsted, Peter
Besigye, Innocent
Kallestrup, Per
author_sort Schriver, Michael
collection PubMed
description Background: External supervision of primary health care facilities to monitor and improve services is common in low-income countries. Currently there are no tools to measure the quality of support in external supervision in these countries. Aim: To develop a provider-reported instrument to assess the support delivered through external supervision in Rwanda and other countries. Methods: “External supervision: Provider Evaluation of Supervisor Support” (ExPRESS) was developed in 18 steps, primarily in Rwanda. Content validity was optimised using systematic search for related instruments, interviews, translations, and relevance assessments by international supervision experts as well as local experts in Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda. Construct validity and reliability were examined in two separate field tests, the first using exploratory factor analysis and a test–retest design, the second for confirmatory factor analysis. Results: We included 16 items in section A (‘The most recent experience with an external supervisor’), and 13 items in section B (‘The overall experience with external supervisors’). Item-content validity index was acceptable. In field test I, test–retest had acceptable kappa values and exploratory factor analysis suggested relevant factors in sections A and B used for model hypotheses. In field test II, models were tested by confirmatory factor analysis fitting a 4-factor model for section A, and a 3-factor model for section B. Conclusions: ExPRESS is a promising tool for evaluation of the quality of support of primary health care providers in external supervision of primary health care facilities in resource-constrained settings. ExPRESS may be used as specific feedback to external supervisors to help identify and address gaps in the supervision they provide. Further studies should determine optimal interpretation of scores and the number of respondents needed per supervisor to obtain precise results, as well as test the functionality of section B.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5945230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59452302018-05-14 Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision Schriver, Michael Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire Vedsted, Peter Besigye, Innocent Kallestrup, Per Glob Health Action Original Article Background: External supervision of primary health care facilities to monitor and improve services is common in low-income countries. Currently there are no tools to measure the quality of support in external supervision in these countries. Aim: To develop a provider-reported instrument to assess the support delivered through external supervision in Rwanda and other countries. Methods: “External supervision: Provider Evaluation of Supervisor Support” (ExPRESS) was developed in 18 steps, primarily in Rwanda. Content validity was optimised using systematic search for related instruments, interviews, translations, and relevance assessments by international supervision experts as well as local experts in Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda. Construct validity and reliability were examined in two separate field tests, the first using exploratory factor analysis and a test–retest design, the second for confirmatory factor analysis. Results: We included 16 items in section A (‘The most recent experience with an external supervisor’), and 13 items in section B (‘The overall experience with external supervisors’). Item-content validity index was acceptable. In field test I, test–retest had acceptable kappa values and exploratory factor analysis suggested relevant factors in sections A and B used for model hypotheses. In field test II, models were tested by confirmatory factor analysis fitting a 4-factor model for section A, and a 3-factor model for section B. Conclusions: ExPRESS is a promising tool for evaluation of the quality of support of primary health care providers in external supervision of primary health care facilities in resource-constrained settings. ExPRESS may be used as specific feedback to external supervisors to help identify and address gaps in the supervision they provide. Further studies should determine optimal interpretation of scores and the number of respondents needed per supervisor to obtain precise results, as well as test the functionality of section B. Taylor & Francis 2018-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5945230/ /pubmed/29547066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1445466 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
spellingShingle Original Article
Schriver, Michael
Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire
Vedsted, Peter
Besigye, Innocent
Kallestrup, Per
Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision
title Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision
title_full Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision
title_fullStr Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision
title_short Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision
title_sort development and validation of the express instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29547066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1445466
work_keys_str_mv AT schrivermichael developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision
AT cubakavincentkalumire developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision
AT vedstedpeter developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision
AT besigyeinnocent developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision
AT kallestrupper developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision