Cargando…
Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision
Background: External supervision of primary health care facilities to monitor and improve services is common in low-income countries. Currently there are no tools to measure the quality of support in external supervision in these countries. Aim: To develop a provider-reported instrument to assess th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29547066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1445466 |
_version_ | 1783321960338423808 |
---|---|
author | Schriver, Michael Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire Vedsted, Peter Besigye, Innocent Kallestrup, Per |
author_facet | Schriver, Michael Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire Vedsted, Peter Besigye, Innocent Kallestrup, Per |
author_sort | Schriver, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: External supervision of primary health care facilities to monitor and improve services is common in low-income countries. Currently there are no tools to measure the quality of support in external supervision in these countries. Aim: To develop a provider-reported instrument to assess the support delivered through external supervision in Rwanda and other countries. Methods: “External supervision: Provider Evaluation of Supervisor Support” (ExPRESS) was developed in 18 steps, primarily in Rwanda. Content validity was optimised using systematic search for related instruments, interviews, translations, and relevance assessments by international supervision experts as well as local experts in Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda. Construct validity and reliability were examined in two separate field tests, the first using exploratory factor analysis and a test–retest design, the second for confirmatory factor analysis. Results: We included 16 items in section A (‘The most recent experience with an external supervisor’), and 13 items in section B (‘The overall experience with external supervisors’). Item-content validity index was acceptable. In field test I, test–retest had acceptable kappa values and exploratory factor analysis suggested relevant factors in sections A and B used for model hypotheses. In field test II, models were tested by confirmatory factor analysis fitting a 4-factor model for section A, and a 3-factor model for section B. Conclusions: ExPRESS is a promising tool for evaluation of the quality of support of primary health care providers in external supervision of primary health care facilities in resource-constrained settings. ExPRESS may be used as specific feedback to external supervisors to help identify and address gaps in the supervision they provide. Further studies should determine optimal interpretation of scores and the number of respondents needed per supervisor to obtain precise results, as well as test the functionality of section B. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5945230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59452302018-05-14 Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision Schriver, Michael Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire Vedsted, Peter Besigye, Innocent Kallestrup, Per Glob Health Action Original Article Background: External supervision of primary health care facilities to monitor and improve services is common in low-income countries. Currently there are no tools to measure the quality of support in external supervision in these countries. Aim: To develop a provider-reported instrument to assess the support delivered through external supervision in Rwanda and other countries. Methods: “External supervision: Provider Evaluation of Supervisor Support” (ExPRESS) was developed in 18 steps, primarily in Rwanda. Content validity was optimised using systematic search for related instruments, interviews, translations, and relevance assessments by international supervision experts as well as local experts in Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda. Construct validity and reliability were examined in two separate field tests, the first using exploratory factor analysis and a test–retest design, the second for confirmatory factor analysis. Results: We included 16 items in section A (‘The most recent experience with an external supervisor’), and 13 items in section B (‘The overall experience with external supervisors’). Item-content validity index was acceptable. In field test I, test–retest had acceptable kappa values and exploratory factor analysis suggested relevant factors in sections A and B used for model hypotheses. In field test II, models were tested by confirmatory factor analysis fitting a 4-factor model for section A, and a 3-factor model for section B. Conclusions: ExPRESS is a promising tool for evaluation of the quality of support of primary health care providers in external supervision of primary health care facilities in resource-constrained settings. ExPRESS may be used as specific feedback to external supervisors to help identify and address gaps in the supervision they provide. Further studies should determine optimal interpretation of scores and the number of respondents needed per supervisor to obtain precise results, as well as test the functionality of section B. Taylor & Francis 2018-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5945230/ /pubmed/29547066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1445466 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Schriver, Michael Cubaka, Vincent Kalumire Vedsted, Peter Besigye, Innocent Kallestrup, Per Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision |
title | Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision |
title_full | Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision |
title_short | Development and validation of the ExPRESS instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision |
title_sort | development and validation of the express instrument for primary health care providers’ evaluation of external supervision |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29547066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1445466 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schrivermichael developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision AT cubakavincentkalumire developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision AT vedstedpeter developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision AT besigyeinnocent developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision AT kallestrupper developmentandvalidationoftheexpressinstrumentforprimaryhealthcareprovidersevaluationofexternalsupervision |