Cargando…
Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
PURPOSE: To review our experience in ultrasound fetal weight estimation in our large population of triplet pregnancies. METHODS: Ninety-seven triplet pregnancies were retrospectively included between January 2003 and January 2017. Sonographic fetal weight estimation using Hadlock’s and Schild’s form...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4746-0 |
_version_ | 1783322047822168064 |
---|---|
author | Pils, Sophie Springer, Stephanie Seemann, Rudolf Wehrmann, Verena Worda, Christof Ott, Johannes |
author_facet | Pils, Sophie Springer, Stephanie Seemann, Rudolf Wehrmann, Verena Worda, Christof Ott, Johannes |
author_sort | Pils, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To review our experience in ultrasound fetal weight estimation in our large population of triplet pregnancies. METHODS: Ninety-seven triplet pregnancies were retrospectively included between January 2003 and January 2017. Sonographic fetal weight estimation using Hadlock’s and Schild’s formulas was compared to actual birth weight in a tertiary-care center in Vienna, Austria. Statistical analyses were performed using a stepwise linear regression model and crosstabs. RESULTS: The median discrepancy between the sonographically estimated fetal weight by Hadlock’s formula and the actual birth weight was 106 g (IQR 56–190). The percentage error and its standard deviation were − 2.5 ± 12.1%, and the median percentage error was − 3.6%. Concerning the use of Hadlock’s formula, estimated fetal weight was the most important factor predictive of actual birth weight with an estimate of 0.920 (p < 0.001). Female neonates had been overestimated by a mean of 50.473 g per fetus. The sonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates was significantly reliable (p < 0.001), with positive and negative predictive values ranging from 81.3 to 100.0%. Similar results were obtained for Schild’s formula. CONCLUSION: Even if sonographically estimated fetal weight in triplet pregnancies has a high overall accuracy of fetal weight estimation, there are some limitations in prediction of intrauterine growth restrictions, especially in female fetuses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5945739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59457392018-05-15 Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study Pils, Sophie Springer, Stephanie Seemann, Rudolf Wehrmann, Verena Worda, Christof Ott, Johannes Arch Gynecol Obstet Maternal-Fetal Medicine PURPOSE: To review our experience in ultrasound fetal weight estimation in our large population of triplet pregnancies. METHODS: Ninety-seven triplet pregnancies were retrospectively included between January 2003 and January 2017. Sonographic fetal weight estimation using Hadlock’s and Schild’s formulas was compared to actual birth weight in a tertiary-care center in Vienna, Austria. Statistical analyses were performed using a stepwise linear regression model and crosstabs. RESULTS: The median discrepancy between the sonographically estimated fetal weight by Hadlock’s formula and the actual birth weight was 106 g (IQR 56–190). The percentage error and its standard deviation were − 2.5 ± 12.1%, and the median percentage error was − 3.6%. Concerning the use of Hadlock’s formula, estimated fetal weight was the most important factor predictive of actual birth weight with an estimate of 0.920 (p < 0.001). Female neonates had been overestimated by a mean of 50.473 g per fetus. The sonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates was significantly reliable (p < 0.001), with positive and negative predictive values ranging from 81.3 to 100.0%. Similar results were obtained for Schild’s formula. CONCLUSION: Even if sonographically estimated fetal weight in triplet pregnancies has a high overall accuracy of fetal weight estimation, there are some limitations in prediction of intrauterine growth restrictions, especially in female fetuses. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5945739/ /pubmed/29550943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4746-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Maternal-Fetal Medicine Pils, Sophie Springer, Stephanie Seemann, Rudolf Wehrmann, Verena Worda, Christof Ott, Johannes Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study |
title | Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Maternal-Fetal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4746-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pilssophie reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT springerstephanie reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT seemannrudolf reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wehrmannverena reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT wordachristof reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT ottjohannes reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy |