Cargando…

Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE: To review our experience in ultrasound fetal weight estimation in our large population of triplet pregnancies. METHODS: Ninety-seven triplet pregnancies were retrospectively included between January 2003 and January 2017. Sonographic fetal weight estimation using Hadlock’s and Schild’s form...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pils, Sophie, Springer, Stephanie, Seemann, Rudolf, Wehrmann, Verena, Worda, Christof, Ott, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4746-0
_version_ 1783322047822168064
author Pils, Sophie
Springer, Stephanie
Seemann, Rudolf
Wehrmann, Verena
Worda, Christof
Ott, Johannes
author_facet Pils, Sophie
Springer, Stephanie
Seemann, Rudolf
Wehrmann, Verena
Worda, Christof
Ott, Johannes
author_sort Pils, Sophie
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To review our experience in ultrasound fetal weight estimation in our large population of triplet pregnancies. METHODS: Ninety-seven triplet pregnancies were retrospectively included between January 2003 and January 2017. Sonographic fetal weight estimation using Hadlock’s and Schild’s formulas was compared to actual birth weight in a tertiary-care center in Vienna, Austria. Statistical analyses were performed using a stepwise linear regression model and crosstabs. RESULTS: The median discrepancy between the sonographically estimated fetal weight by Hadlock’s formula and the actual birth weight was 106 g (IQR 56–190). The percentage error and its standard deviation were − 2.5 ± 12.1%, and the median percentage error was − 3.6%. Concerning the use of Hadlock’s formula, estimated fetal weight was the most important factor predictive of actual birth weight with an estimate of 0.920 (p < 0.001). Female neonates had been overestimated by a mean of 50.473 g per fetus. The sonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates was significantly reliable (p < 0.001), with positive and negative predictive values ranging from 81.3 to 100.0%. Similar results were obtained for Schild’s formula. CONCLUSION: Even if sonographically estimated fetal weight in triplet pregnancies has a high overall accuracy of fetal weight estimation, there are some limitations in prediction of intrauterine growth restrictions, especially in female fetuses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5945739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59457392018-05-15 Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study Pils, Sophie Springer, Stephanie Seemann, Rudolf Wehrmann, Verena Worda, Christof Ott, Johannes Arch Gynecol Obstet Maternal-Fetal Medicine PURPOSE: To review our experience in ultrasound fetal weight estimation in our large population of triplet pregnancies. METHODS: Ninety-seven triplet pregnancies were retrospectively included between January 2003 and January 2017. Sonographic fetal weight estimation using Hadlock’s and Schild’s formulas was compared to actual birth weight in a tertiary-care center in Vienna, Austria. Statistical analyses were performed using a stepwise linear regression model and crosstabs. RESULTS: The median discrepancy between the sonographically estimated fetal weight by Hadlock’s formula and the actual birth weight was 106 g (IQR 56–190). The percentage error and its standard deviation were − 2.5 ± 12.1%, and the median percentage error was − 3.6%. Concerning the use of Hadlock’s formula, estimated fetal weight was the most important factor predictive of actual birth weight with an estimate of 0.920 (p < 0.001). Female neonates had been overestimated by a mean of 50.473 g per fetus. The sonographic prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates was significantly reliable (p < 0.001), with positive and negative predictive values ranging from 81.3 to 100.0%. Similar results were obtained for Schild’s formula. CONCLUSION: Even if sonographically estimated fetal weight in triplet pregnancies has a high overall accuracy of fetal weight estimation, there are some limitations in prediction of intrauterine growth restrictions, especially in female fetuses. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5945739/ /pubmed/29550943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4746-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Pils, Sophie
Springer, Stephanie
Seemann, Rudolf
Wehrmann, Verena
Worda, Christof
Ott, Johannes
Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
title Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study
topic Maternal-Fetal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29550943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4746-0
work_keys_str_mv AT pilssophie reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT springerstephanie reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT seemannrudolf reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wehrmannverena reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wordachristof reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ottjohannes reliabilityofsonographicfetalweightestimationintripletpregnanciesaretrospectivecohortstudy