Cargando…

A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time

BACKGROUND: Mammographic density is a marker of breast cancer risk and diagnostics accuracy. Density change over time is a strong proxy for response to endocrine treatment and potentially a stronger predictor of breast cancer incidence. We developed STRATUS to analyse digital and analogue images and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eriksson, Mikael, Li, Jingmei, Leifland, Karin, Czene, Kamila, Hall, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5
_version_ 1783322048297172992
author Eriksson, Mikael
Li, Jingmei
Leifland, Karin
Czene, Kamila
Hall, Per
author_facet Eriksson, Mikael
Li, Jingmei
Leifland, Karin
Czene, Kamila
Hall, Per
author_sort Eriksson, Mikael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mammographic density is a marker of breast cancer risk and diagnostics accuracy. Density change over time is a strong proxy for response to endocrine treatment and potentially a stronger predictor of breast cancer incidence. We developed STRATUS to analyse digital and analogue images and enable automated measurements of density changes over time. METHOD: Raw and processed images from the same mammogram were randomly sampled from 41,353 healthy women. Measurements from raw images (using FDA approved software iCAD) were used as templates for STRATUS to measure density on processed images through machine learning. A similar two-step design was used to train density measures in analogue images. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated in three unique datasets. An alignment protocol was developed using images from 11,409 women to reduce non-biological variability in density change. The protocol was evaluated in 55,073 women having two regular mammography screens. Differences and variances in densities were compared before and after image alignment. RESULTS: The average relative risk of breast cancer in the three datasets was 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–1.8] per standard deviation of percent mammographic density. The discrimination was AUC 0.62 (CI 0.60–0.64). The type of image did not significantly influence the risk associations. Alignment decreased the non-biological variability in density change and re-estimated the yearly overall percent density decrease from 1.5 to 0.9%, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of STRATUS density measures was not influenced by mammogram type. The alignment protocol reduced the non-biological variability between images over time. STRATUS has the potential to become a useful tool for epidemiological studies and clinical follow-up. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5945741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59457412018-05-15 A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time Eriksson, Mikael Li, Jingmei Leifland, Karin Czene, Kamila Hall, Per Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Mammographic density is a marker of breast cancer risk and diagnostics accuracy. Density change over time is a strong proxy for response to endocrine treatment and potentially a stronger predictor of breast cancer incidence. We developed STRATUS to analyse digital and analogue images and enable automated measurements of density changes over time. METHOD: Raw and processed images from the same mammogram were randomly sampled from 41,353 healthy women. Measurements from raw images (using FDA approved software iCAD) were used as templates for STRATUS to measure density on processed images through machine learning. A similar two-step design was used to train density measures in analogue images. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated in three unique datasets. An alignment protocol was developed using images from 11,409 women to reduce non-biological variability in density change. The protocol was evaluated in 55,073 women having two regular mammography screens. Differences and variances in densities were compared before and after image alignment. RESULTS: The average relative risk of breast cancer in the three datasets was 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–1.8] per standard deviation of percent mammographic density. The discrimination was AUC 0.62 (CI 0.60–0.64). The type of image did not significantly influence the risk associations. Alignment decreased the non-biological variability in density change and re-estimated the yearly overall percent density decrease from 1.5 to 0.9%, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of STRATUS density measures was not influenced by mammogram type. The alignment protocol reduced the non-biological variability between images over time. STRATUS has the potential to become a useful tool for epidemiological studies and clinical follow-up. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-02-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5945741/ /pubmed/29392583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Eriksson, Mikael
Li, Jingmei
Leifland, Karin
Czene, Kamila
Hall, Per
A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time
title A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time
title_full A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time
title_fullStr A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time
title_full_unstemmed A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time
title_short A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time
title_sort comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5
work_keys_str_mv AT erikssonmikael acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime
AT lijingmei acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime
AT leiflandkarin acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime
AT czenekamila acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime
AT hallper acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime
AT erikssonmikael comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime
AT lijingmei comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime
AT leiflandkarin comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime
AT czenekamila comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime
AT hallper comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime