Cargando…
A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time
BACKGROUND: Mammographic density is a marker of breast cancer risk and diagnostics accuracy. Density change over time is a strong proxy for response to endocrine treatment and potentially a stronger predictor of breast cancer incidence. We developed STRATUS to analyse digital and analogue images and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5 |
_version_ | 1783322048297172992 |
---|---|
author | Eriksson, Mikael Li, Jingmei Leifland, Karin Czene, Kamila Hall, Per |
author_facet | Eriksson, Mikael Li, Jingmei Leifland, Karin Czene, Kamila Hall, Per |
author_sort | Eriksson, Mikael |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mammographic density is a marker of breast cancer risk and diagnostics accuracy. Density change over time is a strong proxy for response to endocrine treatment and potentially a stronger predictor of breast cancer incidence. We developed STRATUS to analyse digital and analogue images and enable automated measurements of density changes over time. METHOD: Raw and processed images from the same mammogram were randomly sampled from 41,353 healthy women. Measurements from raw images (using FDA approved software iCAD) were used as templates for STRATUS to measure density on processed images through machine learning. A similar two-step design was used to train density measures in analogue images. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated in three unique datasets. An alignment protocol was developed using images from 11,409 women to reduce non-biological variability in density change. The protocol was evaluated in 55,073 women having two regular mammography screens. Differences and variances in densities were compared before and after image alignment. RESULTS: The average relative risk of breast cancer in the three datasets was 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–1.8] per standard deviation of percent mammographic density. The discrimination was AUC 0.62 (CI 0.60–0.64). The type of image did not significantly influence the risk associations. Alignment decreased the non-biological variability in density change and re-estimated the yearly overall percent density decrease from 1.5 to 0.9%, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of STRATUS density measures was not influenced by mammogram type. The alignment protocol reduced the non-biological variability between images over time. STRATUS has the potential to become a useful tool for epidemiological studies and clinical follow-up. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5945741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59457412018-05-15 A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time Eriksson, Mikael Li, Jingmei Leifland, Karin Czene, Kamila Hall, Per Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Mammographic density is a marker of breast cancer risk and diagnostics accuracy. Density change over time is a strong proxy for response to endocrine treatment and potentially a stronger predictor of breast cancer incidence. We developed STRATUS to analyse digital and analogue images and enable automated measurements of density changes over time. METHOD: Raw and processed images from the same mammogram were randomly sampled from 41,353 healthy women. Measurements from raw images (using FDA approved software iCAD) were used as templates for STRATUS to measure density on processed images through machine learning. A similar two-step design was used to train density measures in analogue images. Relative risks of breast cancer were estimated in three unique datasets. An alignment protocol was developed using images from 11,409 women to reduce non-biological variability in density change. The protocol was evaluated in 55,073 women having two regular mammography screens. Differences and variances in densities were compared before and after image alignment. RESULTS: The average relative risk of breast cancer in the three datasets was 1.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–1.8] per standard deviation of percent mammographic density. The discrimination was AUC 0.62 (CI 0.60–0.64). The type of image did not significantly influence the risk associations. Alignment decreased the non-biological variability in density change and re-estimated the yearly overall percent density decrease from 1.5 to 0.9%, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of STRATUS density measures was not influenced by mammogram type. The alignment protocol reduced the non-biological variability between images over time. STRATUS has the potential to become a useful tool for epidemiological studies and clinical follow-up. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-02-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5945741/ /pubmed/29392583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Eriksson, Mikael Li, Jingmei Leifland, Karin Czene, Kamila Hall, Per A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time |
title | A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time |
title_full | A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time |
title_fullStr | A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time |
title_full_unstemmed | A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time |
title_short | A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time |
title_sort | comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29392583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4690-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT erikssonmikael acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime AT lijingmei acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime AT leiflandkarin acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime AT czenekamila acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime AT hallper acomprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime AT erikssonmikael comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime AT lijingmei comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime AT leiflandkarin comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime AT czenekamila comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime AT hallper comprehensivetoolformeasuringmammographicdensitychangesovertime |