Cargando…

Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?

The principle of similarity (Thompson, 1917) states that the weight of an organism follows the 3/2-power law of its surface area and is proportional to its volume on the condition that the density is constant. However, the allometric relationship between leaf weight and leaf area has been reported t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Shuyan, Shao, Lijuan, Hui, Cang, Song, Yu, Reddy, Gadi V. P., Gielis, Johan, Li, Fang, Ding, Yulong, Wei, Qiang, Shi, Peijian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00583
_version_ 1783322081700610048
author Lin, Shuyan
Shao, Lijuan
Hui, Cang
Song, Yu
Reddy, Gadi V. P.
Gielis, Johan
Li, Fang
Ding, Yulong
Wei, Qiang
Shi, Peijian
author_facet Lin, Shuyan
Shao, Lijuan
Hui, Cang
Song, Yu
Reddy, Gadi V. P.
Gielis, Johan
Li, Fang
Ding, Yulong
Wei, Qiang
Shi, Peijian
author_sort Lin, Shuyan
collection PubMed
description The principle of similarity (Thompson, 1917) states that the weight of an organism follows the 3/2-power law of its surface area and is proportional to its volume on the condition that the density is constant. However, the allometric relationship between leaf weight and leaf area has been reported to greatly deviate from the 3/2-power law, with the irregularity of leaf density largely ignored for explaining this deviation. Here, we choose 11 bamboo species to explore the allometric relationships among leaf area (A), density (ρ), length (L), thickness (T), and weight (W). Because the edge of a bamboo leaf follows a simplified two-parameter Gielis equation, we could show that A ∝ L(2) and that A ∝ T(2). This then allowed us to derive the density-thickness allometry ρ ∝ T(b) and the weight-area allometry W ∝ A((b+3)/2) ≈ A(9/8), where b approximates −3/4. Leaf density is strikingly negatively associated with leaf thickness, and it is this inverse relationship that results in the weight-area allometry to deviate from the 3/2-power law. In conclusion, although plants are prone to invest less dry mass and thus produce thinner leaves when the leaf area is sufficient for photosynthesis, such leaf thinning needs to be accompanied with elevated density to ensure structural stability. The findings provide the insights on the evolutionary clue about the biomass investment and output of photosynthetic organs of plants. Because of the importance of leaves, plants could have enhanced the ratio of dry material per unit area of leaf in order to increase the efficiency of photosynthesis, relative the other parts of plants. Although the conclusion is drawn only based on 11 bamboo species, it should also be applicable to the other plants, especially considering previous works on the exponent of the weight-area relationship being less than 3/2 in plants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5945892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59458922018-05-18 Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law? Lin, Shuyan Shao, Lijuan Hui, Cang Song, Yu Reddy, Gadi V. P. Gielis, Johan Li, Fang Ding, Yulong Wei, Qiang Shi, Peijian Front Plant Sci Plant Science The principle of similarity (Thompson, 1917) states that the weight of an organism follows the 3/2-power law of its surface area and is proportional to its volume on the condition that the density is constant. However, the allometric relationship between leaf weight and leaf area has been reported to greatly deviate from the 3/2-power law, with the irregularity of leaf density largely ignored for explaining this deviation. Here, we choose 11 bamboo species to explore the allometric relationships among leaf area (A), density (ρ), length (L), thickness (T), and weight (W). Because the edge of a bamboo leaf follows a simplified two-parameter Gielis equation, we could show that A ∝ L(2) and that A ∝ T(2). This then allowed us to derive the density-thickness allometry ρ ∝ T(b) and the weight-area allometry W ∝ A((b+3)/2) ≈ A(9/8), where b approximates −3/4. Leaf density is strikingly negatively associated with leaf thickness, and it is this inverse relationship that results in the weight-area allometry to deviate from the 3/2-power law. In conclusion, although plants are prone to invest less dry mass and thus produce thinner leaves when the leaf area is sufficient for photosynthesis, such leaf thinning needs to be accompanied with elevated density to ensure structural stability. The findings provide the insights on the evolutionary clue about the biomass investment and output of photosynthetic organs of plants. Because of the importance of leaves, plants could have enhanced the ratio of dry material per unit area of leaf in order to increase the efficiency of photosynthesis, relative the other parts of plants. Although the conclusion is drawn only based on 11 bamboo species, it should also be applicable to the other plants, especially considering previous works on the exponent of the weight-area relationship being less than 3/2 in plants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5945892/ /pubmed/29780397 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00583 Text en Copyright © 2018 Lin, Shao, Hui, Song, Reddy, Gielis, Li, Ding, Wei and Shi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Lin, Shuyan
Shao, Lijuan
Hui, Cang
Song, Yu
Reddy, Gadi V. P.
Gielis, Johan
Li, Fang
Ding, Yulong
Wei, Qiang
Shi, Peijian
Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?
title Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?
title_full Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?
title_fullStr Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?
title_full_unstemmed Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?
title_short Why Does Not the Leaf Weight-Area Allometry of Bamboos Follow the 3/2-Power Law?
title_sort why does not the leaf weight-area allometry of bamboos follow the 3/2-power law?
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5945892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780397
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00583
work_keys_str_mv AT linshuyan whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw
AT shaolijuan whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw
AT huicang whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw
AT songyu whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw
AT reddygadivp whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw
AT gielisjohan whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw
AT lifang whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw
AT dingyulong whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw
AT weiqiang whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw
AT shipeijian whydoesnottheleafweightareaallometryofbamboosfollowthe32powerlaw