Cargando…

What We Know About the Brain Structure–Function Relationship

How the human brain works is still a question, as is its implication with brain architecture: the non-trivial structure–function relationship. The main hypothesis is that the anatomic architecture conditions, but does not determine, the neural network dynamic. The functional connectivity cannot be e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Batista-García-Ramó, Karla, Fernández-Verdecia, Caridad Ivette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29670045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs8040039
_version_ 1783322124193103872
author Batista-García-Ramó, Karla
Fernández-Verdecia, Caridad Ivette
author_facet Batista-García-Ramó, Karla
Fernández-Verdecia, Caridad Ivette
author_sort Batista-García-Ramó, Karla
collection PubMed
description How the human brain works is still a question, as is its implication with brain architecture: the non-trivial structure–function relationship. The main hypothesis is that the anatomic architecture conditions, but does not determine, the neural network dynamic. The functional connectivity cannot be explained only considering the anatomical substrate. This involves complex and controversial aspects of the neuroscience field and that the methods and methodologies to obtain structural and functional connectivity are not always rigorously applied. The goal of the present article is to discuss about the progress made to elucidate the structure–function relationship of the Central Nervous System, particularly at the brain level, based on results from human and animal studies. The current novel systems and neuroimaging techniques with high resolutive physio-structural capacity have brought about the development of an integral framework of different structural and morphometric tools such as image processing, computational modeling and graph theory. Different laboratories have contributed with in vivo, in vitro and computational/mathematical models to study the intrinsic neural activity patterns based on anatomical connections. We conclude that multi-modal techniques of neuroimaging are required such as an improvement on methodologies for obtaining structural and functional connectivity. Even though simulations of the intrinsic neural activity based on anatomical connectivity can reproduce much of the observed patterns of empirical functional connectivity, future models should be multifactorial to elucidate multi-scale relationships and to infer disorder mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5946098
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59460982018-05-15 What We Know About the Brain Structure–Function Relationship Batista-García-Ramó, Karla Fernández-Verdecia, Caridad Ivette Behav Sci (Basel) Review How the human brain works is still a question, as is its implication with brain architecture: the non-trivial structure–function relationship. The main hypothesis is that the anatomic architecture conditions, but does not determine, the neural network dynamic. The functional connectivity cannot be explained only considering the anatomical substrate. This involves complex and controversial aspects of the neuroscience field and that the methods and methodologies to obtain structural and functional connectivity are not always rigorously applied. The goal of the present article is to discuss about the progress made to elucidate the structure–function relationship of the Central Nervous System, particularly at the brain level, based on results from human and animal studies. The current novel systems and neuroimaging techniques with high resolutive physio-structural capacity have brought about the development of an integral framework of different structural and morphometric tools such as image processing, computational modeling and graph theory. Different laboratories have contributed with in vivo, in vitro and computational/mathematical models to study the intrinsic neural activity patterns based on anatomical connections. We conclude that multi-modal techniques of neuroimaging are required such as an improvement on methodologies for obtaining structural and functional connectivity. Even though simulations of the intrinsic neural activity based on anatomical connectivity can reproduce much of the observed patterns of empirical functional connectivity, future models should be multifactorial to elucidate multi-scale relationships and to infer disorder mechanisms. MDPI 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5946098/ /pubmed/29670045 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs8040039 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Batista-García-Ramó, Karla
Fernández-Verdecia, Caridad Ivette
What We Know About the Brain Structure–Function Relationship
title What We Know About the Brain Structure–Function Relationship
title_full What We Know About the Brain Structure–Function Relationship
title_fullStr What We Know About the Brain Structure–Function Relationship
title_full_unstemmed What We Know About the Brain Structure–Function Relationship
title_short What We Know About the Brain Structure–Function Relationship
title_sort what we know about the brain structure–function relationship
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946098/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29670045
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs8040039
work_keys_str_mv AT batistagarciaramokarla whatweknowaboutthebrainstructurefunctionrelationship
AT fernandezverdeciacaridadivette whatweknowaboutthebrainstructurefunctionrelationship