Cargando…
Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda
Agronomic biofortification (i.e., the application of fertilizer to elevate micronutrient concentrations in staple crops) is a recent strategy recommended for controlling Iodine Deficiency Disorders (IDDs). However, its success inevitably depends on stakeholders’ appreciation and acceptance of it. By...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10040407 |
_version_ | 1783322145825226752 |
---|---|
author | Olum, Solomon Gellynck, Xavier Okello, Collins Webale, Dominic Odongo, Walter Ongeng, Duncan De Steur, Hans |
author_facet | Olum, Solomon Gellynck, Xavier Okello, Collins Webale, Dominic Odongo, Walter Ongeng, Duncan De Steur, Hans |
author_sort | Olum, Solomon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Agronomic biofortification (i.e., the application of fertilizer to elevate micronutrient concentrations in staple crops) is a recent strategy recommended for controlling Iodine Deficiency Disorders (IDDs). However, its success inevitably depends on stakeholders’ appreciation and acceptance of it. By taking Northern Uganda as a case, this study aimed to capture and compare the perceptions of seven key stakeholder groups with respect to agronomic iodine biofortification. Therefore, we employed a SWOT (Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats) analysis in combination with an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Findings show that stakeholders (n = 56) are generally positive about agronomic iodine biofortification in Uganda, as its strengths and opportunities outweighed weaknesses and threats. Cultural acceptance and effectiveness are considered the most important strengths while the high IDD prevalence rate and the availability of iodine deficient soils are key opportunities for further developing agronomic iodine biofortification. Environmental concerns about synthetic fertilizers as well as the time needed to supply iodine were considered crucial weaknesses. The limited use of fertilizer in Uganda was the main threat. While this study provides insight into important issues and priorities for iodine biofortification technology in Uganda, including differences in stakeholder views, the application of the SWOT-AHP method will guide future researchers and health planners conducting stakeholder analysis in similar domains. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5946192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59461922018-05-15 Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda Olum, Solomon Gellynck, Xavier Okello, Collins Webale, Dominic Odongo, Walter Ongeng, Duncan De Steur, Hans Nutrients Article Agronomic biofortification (i.e., the application of fertilizer to elevate micronutrient concentrations in staple crops) is a recent strategy recommended for controlling Iodine Deficiency Disorders (IDDs). However, its success inevitably depends on stakeholders’ appreciation and acceptance of it. By taking Northern Uganda as a case, this study aimed to capture and compare the perceptions of seven key stakeholder groups with respect to agronomic iodine biofortification. Therefore, we employed a SWOT (Strength, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats) analysis in combination with an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Findings show that stakeholders (n = 56) are generally positive about agronomic iodine biofortification in Uganda, as its strengths and opportunities outweighed weaknesses and threats. Cultural acceptance and effectiveness are considered the most important strengths while the high IDD prevalence rate and the availability of iodine deficient soils are key opportunities for further developing agronomic iodine biofortification. Environmental concerns about synthetic fertilizers as well as the time needed to supply iodine were considered crucial weaknesses. The limited use of fertilizer in Uganda was the main threat. While this study provides insight into important issues and priorities for iodine biofortification technology in Uganda, including differences in stakeholder views, the application of the SWOT-AHP method will guide future researchers and health planners conducting stakeholder analysis in similar domains. MDPI 2018-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5946192/ /pubmed/29587370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10040407 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Olum, Solomon Gellynck, Xavier Okello, Collins Webale, Dominic Odongo, Walter Ongeng, Duncan De Steur, Hans Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda |
title | Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda |
title_full | Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda |
title_fullStr | Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda |
title_short | Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Agronomic Iodine Biofortification: A SWOT-AHP Analysis in Northern Uganda |
title_sort | stakeholders’ perceptions of agronomic iodine biofortification: a swot-ahp analysis in northern uganda |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29587370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10040407 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olumsolomon stakeholdersperceptionsofagronomiciodinebiofortificationaswotahpanalysisinnorthernuganda AT gellynckxavier stakeholdersperceptionsofagronomiciodinebiofortificationaswotahpanalysisinnorthernuganda AT okellocollins stakeholdersperceptionsofagronomiciodinebiofortificationaswotahpanalysisinnorthernuganda AT webaledominic stakeholdersperceptionsofagronomiciodinebiofortificationaswotahpanalysisinnorthernuganda AT odongowalter stakeholdersperceptionsofagronomiciodinebiofortificationaswotahpanalysisinnorthernuganda AT ongengduncan stakeholdersperceptionsofagronomiciodinebiofortificationaswotahpanalysisinnorthernuganda AT desteurhans stakeholdersperceptionsofagronomiciodinebiofortificationaswotahpanalysisinnorthernuganda |