Cargando…
The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of metastatic breast cancer care is associated with positive patient outcomes. In daily clinical practice, however, SDM is not fully integrated yet. Initiatives to improve the implementation of SDM would be helpful. The aim of this review wa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29747628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0330-4 |
_version_ | 1783322187051040768 |
---|---|
author | Spronk, Inge Burgers, Jako S. Schellevis, François G. van Vliet, Liesbeth M. Korevaar, Joke C. |
author_facet | Spronk, Inge Burgers, Jako S. Schellevis, François G. van Vliet, Liesbeth M. Korevaar, Joke C. |
author_sort | Spronk, Inge |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of metastatic breast cancer care is associated with positive patient outcomes. In daily clinical practice, however, SDM is not fully integrated yet. Initiatives to improve the implementation of SDM would be helpful. The aim of this review was to assess the availability and effectiveness of tools supporting SDM in metastatic breast cancer care. METHODS: Literature databases were systematically searched for articles published since 2006 focusing on the development or evaluation of tools to improve information-provision and to support decision-making in metastatic breast cancer care. Internet searches and experts identified additional tools. Data from included tools were extracted and the evaluation of tools was appraised using the GRADE grading system. RESULTS: The literature search yielded five instruments. In addition, two tools were identified via internet searches and consultation of experts. Four tools were specifically developed for supporting SDM in metastatic breast cancer, the other three tools focused on metastatic cancer in general. Tools were mainly applicable across the care process, and usable for decisions on supportive care with or without chemotherapy. All tools were designed for patients to be used before a consultation with the physician. Effects on patient outcomes were generally weakly positive although most tools were not studied in well-designed studies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its recognized importance, only two tools were positively evaluated on effectiveness and are available to support patients with metastatic breast cancer in SDM. These tools show promising results in pilot studies and focus on different aspects of care. However, their effectiveness should be confirmed in well-designed studies before implementation in clinical practice. Innovation and development of SDM tools targeting clinicians as well as patients during a clinical encounter is recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5946394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59463942018-05-14 The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review Spronk, Inge Burgers, Jako S. Schellevis, François G. van Vliet, Liesbeth M. Korevaar, Joke C. BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of metastatic breast cancer care is associated with positive patient outcomes. In daily clinical practice, however, SDM is not fully integrated yet. Initiatives to improve the implementation of SDM would be helpful. The aim of this review was to assess the availability and effectiveness of tools supporting SDM in metastatic breast cancer care. METHODS: Literature databases were systematically searched for articles published since 2006 focusing on the development or evaluation of tools to improve information-provision and to support decision-making in metastatic breast cancer care. Internet searches and experts identified additional tools. Data from included tools were extracted and the evaluation of tools was appraised using the GRADE grading system. RESULTS: The literature search yielded five instruments. In addition, two tools were identified via internet searches and consultation of experts. Four tools were specifically developed for supporting SDM in metastatic breast cancer, the other three tools focused on metastatic cancer in general. Tools were mainly applicable across the care process, and usable for decisions on supportive care with or without chemotherapy. All tools were designed for patients to be used before a consultation with the physician. Effects on patient outcomes were generally weakly positive although most tools were not studied in well-designed studies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its recognized importance, only two tools were positively evaluated on effectiveness and are available to support patients with metastatic breast cancer in SDM. These tools show promising results in pilot studies and focus on different aspects of care. However, their effectiveness should be confirmed in well-designed studies before implementation in clinical practice. Innovation and development of SDM tools targeting clinicians as well as patients during a clinical encounter is recommended. BioMed Central 2018-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5946394/ /pubmed/29747628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0330-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Spronk, Inge Burgers, Jako S. Schellevis, François G. van Vliet, Liesbeth M. Korevaar, Joke C. The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review |
title | The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review |
title_full | The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review |
title_fullStr | The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review |
title_short | The availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review |
title_sort | availability and effectiveness of tools supporting shared decision making in metastatic breast cancer care: a review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29747628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0330-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spronkinge theavailabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview AT burgersjakos theavailabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview AT schellevisfrancoisg theavailabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview AT vanvlietliesbethm theavailabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview AT korevaarjokec theavailabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview AT spronkinge availabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview AT burgersjakos availabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview AT schellevisfrancoisg availabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview AT vanvlietliesbethm availabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview AT korevaarjokec availabilityandeffectivenessoftoolssupportingshareddecisionmakinginmetastaticbreastcancercareareview |