Cargando…

Differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps

BACKGROUND: Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHC) have been documented to play crucial roles as species- and sex-specific cues in the chemical communication systems of a wide variety of insects. However, whether they are sufficient by themselves as the sole cue triggering sexual behavior as well as preferenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buellesbach, Jan, Vetter, Sebastian G., Schmitt, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-018-0263-z
_version_ 1783322191801090048
author Buellesbach, Jan
Vetter, Sebastian G.
Schmitt, Thomas
author_facet Buellesbach, Jan
Vetter, Sebastian G.
Schmitt, Thomas
author_sort Buellesbach, Jan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHC) have been documented to play crucial roles as species- and sex-specific cues in the chemical communication systems of a wide variety of insects. However, whether they are sufficient by themselves as the sole cue triggering sexual behavior as well as preference of con- over heterospecific mating partners is rarely assessed. We conducted behavioral assays in three representative species of parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to determine their reliance on CHC as species-specific sexual signaling cues. RESULTS: We found a surprising degree of either unspecific or insufficient sexual signaling when CHC are singled out as recognition cues. Most strikingly, the cosmopolitan species Nasonia vitripennis, expected to experience enhanced selection pressure to discriminate against other co-occurring parasitoids, did not discriminate against CHC of a partially sympatric species from another genus, Trichomalopsis sarcophagae. Focusing on the latter species, in turn, it became apparent that CHC are even insufficient as the sole cue triggering conspecific sexual behavior, hinting at the requirement of additional, synergistic sexual cues particularly important in this species. Finally, in the phylogenetically and chemically most divergent species Muscidifurax uniraptor, we intriguingly found both CHC-based sexual signaling as well as species discrimination behavior intact although this species is naturally parthenogenetic with sexual reproduction only occurring under laboratory conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings implicate a discrepancy in the reliance on and specificity of CHC as sexual cues in our tested parasitioid wasps. CHC profiles were not sufficient for unambiguous discrimination and preference behavior, as demonstrated by clear cross-attraction between some of our tested wasp genera. Moreover, we could show that only in T. sarcophagae, additional behavioral cues need to be present for triggering natural mating behavior, hinting at an interesting shift in signaling hierarchy in this particular species. This demonstrates the importance of integrating multiple, potentially complementary signaling modalities in future studies for a better understanding of their individual contributions to natural sexual communication behavior. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12983-018-0263-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5946414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59464142018-05-14 Differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps Buellesbach, Jan Vetter, Sebastian G. Schmitt, Thomas Front Zool Research BACKGROUND: Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHC) have been documented to play crucial roles as species- and sex-specific cues in the chemical communication systems of a wide variety of insects. However, whether they are sufficient by themselves as the sole cue triggering sexual behavior as well as preference of con- over heterospecific mating partners is rarely assessed. We conducted behavioral assays in three representative species of parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to determine their reliance on CHC as species-specific sexual signaling cues. RESULTS: We found a surprising degree of either unspecific or insufficient sexual signaling when CHC are singled out as recognition cues. Most strikingly, the cosmopolitan species Nasonia vitripennis, expected to experience enhanced selection pressure to discriminate against other co-occurring parasitoids, did not discriminate against CHC of a partially sympatric species from another genus, Trichomalopsis sarcophagae. Focusing on the latter species, in turn, it became apparent that CHC are even insufficient as the sole cue triggering conspecific sexual behavior, hinting at the requirement of additional, synergistic sexual cues particularly important in this species. Finally, in the phylogenetically and chemically most divergent species Muscidifurax uniraptor, we intriguingly found both CHC-based sexual signaling as well as species discrimination behavior intact although this species is naturally parthenogenetic with sexual reproduction only occurring under laboratory conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings implicate a discrepancy in the reliance on and specificity of CHC as sexual cues in our tested parasitioid wasps. CHC profiles were not sufficient for unambiguous discrimination and preference behavior, as demonstrated by clear cross-attraction between some of our tested wasp genera. Moreover, we could show that only in T. sarcophagae, additional behavioral cues need to be present for triggering natural mating behavior, hinting at an interesting shift in signaling hierarchy in this particular species. This demonstrates the importance of integrating multiple, potentially complementary signaling modalities in future studies for a better understanding of their individual contributions to natural sexual communication behavior. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12983-018-0263-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5946414/ /pubmed/29760760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-018-0263-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Buellesbach, Jan
Vetter, Sebastian G.
Schmitt, Thomas
Differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps
title Differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps
title_full Differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps
title_fullStr Differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps
title_short Differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps
title_sort differences in the reliance on cuticular hydrocarbons as sexual signaling and species discrimination cues in parasitoid wasps
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29760760
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12983-018-0263-z
work_keys_str_mv AT buellesbachjan differencesintherelianceoncuticularhydrocarbonsassexualsignalingandspeciesdiscriminationcuesinparasitoidwasps
AT vettersebastiang differencesintherelianceoncuticularhydrocarbonsassexualsignalingandspeciesdiscriminationcuesinparasitoidwasps
AT schmittthomas differencesintherelianceoncuticularhydrocarbonsassexualsignalingandspeciesdiscriminationcuesinparasitoidwasps