Cargando…

Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor has been recently reported to be superior to dinoprostone vaginal insert in a phase III trial, but has never been compared to vaginal misoprostol in another galenic form. The aim of this study was to compare misoprostol vaginal insert (MV...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bolla, Daniele, Weissleder, Saskia Vanessa, Radan, Anda-Petronela, Gasparri, Maria Luisa, Raio, Luigi, Müller, Martin, Surbek, Daniel
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2018
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29747591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1788-z

Ejemplares similares

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
por: Marsdal, Kjersti Engen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
por: Noor, Nasreen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Misoprostol vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in labour induction: comparison of obstetrical outcome
por: Mlodawski, Jakub, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Oral misoprostol, low dose vaginal misoprostol, and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: Randomized controlled trial
por: Young, David C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
por: Socha, Maciej W., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets
por: Eriksson, Axelina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Is Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Safe for the Induction of Labor in High-Risk Pregnancy Obese Women?
por: Varlas, Valentin Nicolae, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert – A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study
por: Beyer, Jana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Outcome of misoprostol and oxytocin in induction of labour
por: Acharya, Trishna, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
por: Vorontsova, Yana, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective
por: Draycott, T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of Intracervical Foley’s Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Kadu, Nivedita A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
por: Lapuente-Ocamica, O., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study
por: Schmidt, Markus, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Simplifying oral misoprostol protocols for the induction of labour
por: Weeks, AD, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Comparison of Vaginal Misoprostol with Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
por: Vahid Roudsari, Fatemeh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Pergialiotis, Vasilios, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Effect of extra-amniotic Foley’s catheter and vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol alone on cervical ripening and induction of labor in Kenya, a randomized controlled trial
por: Osoti, Alfred, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Induction of labour with sequential double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone in obese women
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Maternal and fetal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor with low dose vaginal misoprostol
por: Shafqat, Tanveer, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Pregnancy Terminations
por: Milani, Forozan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Role of vaginal estradiol pretreatment combined with vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
por: Casadei, Luisa, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy
por: Wang, Xiu, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A critical appraisal of the misoprostol removable, controlled-release vaginal delivery system of labor induction
por: Patte, Charlotte, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Role of Combination OF Mifepristone and Misoprostol Verses Misoprostol alone in Induction of Labour in Late Intrauterin Fetal Death: A Prospective Study
por: Panda, Subrat, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Labour Induction with Misoprostol in German Obstetric Clinics: What Are the Facts on Such Use?
por: Kehl, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction
por: Elpo, Jhonathan Alcides, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Effect of vaginal washing before Misoprostol insertion on cervical ripening before induction of labor: A randomized single‐blind clinical trial
por: Kabodmehri, Roya, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of Vaginal Dinoprostone Pessary With Transcervical Balloon Catheter Plus Vaginal Misoprostol for Pre-induction Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Trial
por: M, Kanagavarshani, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Vaginal Versus Sublingual Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term and Post Term: a Randomized Prospective Study
por: Ayati, Sedigheh, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparing the effects of vaginal misoprostol, laminaria, and extra amniotic saline infusion on cervical ripening and induction of labor
por: Tabasi, Zohreh, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of sublingual, vaginal, and oral misoprostol in cervical ripening for first trimester abortion
por: Parveen, Shagufta, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Sublingual misoprostol vs. oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor: A retrospective study
por: Amini, Mahdi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Oral Misoprostol alone versus oral misoprostol followed by oxytocin for labour induction in women with hypertension in pregnancy (MOLI): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Bracken, Hillary, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

A randomized trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women
por: Kant, Anita, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBLINGUAL AND VAGINAL ROUTE OF MISOPROSTOL IN MANAGEMENT OF FIRST TRIMESTER MISCARRIAGE MISSING
por: Dehbashi, Zahra, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction of Vaginal Versus Oral Misoprostol in Treatment of Missed Miscarriage
por: Mohammadi, Elham, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effects of Misoprostol on Induction of Labour in Patients with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis
por: Wang, Leilei, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Induction with Foley OR Misoprostol (INFORM) Study dataset. A dataset of 602 women with hypertensive disease in pregnancy, in India, randomised to either Foley catheter or oral misoprostol for induction of labour
por: Mundle, Shuchita, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of the effect of vaginal misoprostol and evening primrose oil capsule with misoprostol alone on the consequences of abortion in women with intrauterine fetal death: a randomized clinical trial
por: Hashemi, Hadis, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_usdb4ufe1rdq0cjrca8msa8p70