Cargando…

Healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data

BACKGROUND: Few people with limited English proficiency are provided with the services of a healthcare interpreter when admitted to hospital. This retrospective study utilised health administrative data to explore which patients with limited English proficiency were provided with a healthcare interp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blay, Nicole, Ioannou, Sharelle, Seremetkoska, Marika, Morris, Jenny, Holters, Gael, Thomas, Verily, Bronwyn, Everett
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29747659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3135-5
_version_ 1783322198131343360
author Blay, Nicole
Ioannou, Sharelle
Seremetkoska, Marika
Morris, Jenny
Holters, Gael
Thomas, Verily
Bronwyn, Everett
author_facet Blay, Nicole
Ioannou, Sharelle
Seremetkoska, Marika
Morris, Jenny
Holters, Gael
Thomas, Verily
Bronwyn, Everett
author_sort Blay, Nicole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Few people with limited English proficiency are provided with the services of a healthcare interpreter when admitted to hospital. This retrospective study utilised health administrative data to explore which patients with limited English proficiency were provided with a healthcare interpreter during their hospital admission. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of health administrative data for adult overnight-stay patients admitted to a public hospital in a region of significant cultural and linguistic diversity in Sydney, Australia in 2014–2015. Descriptive analyses were used to explore demographic and diagnostic data. Chi-square and analysis of variance were used to test for association between variables. RESULTS: The site hospital provided for 19,627 overnight-stay episodes of care over the one year period. Emergency admissions made up 70.5% (n = 13,845) of all hospital admissions and obstetric patients 11.7% (n = 2291). For 15.7% (n = 3074) of episodes of care a healthcare interpreter was identified at hospital admission as being required. In 3.7% (n = 727) of episodes of care a healthcare interpreter was provided. Patients who received an interpreter were more likely to be female, of a younger age and admitted to hospital for childbirth. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of patients with limited English proficiency received a healthcare interpreter during their episode of care. The majority of interpreter services were provided to obstetric patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5946440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59464402018-05-14 Healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data Blay, Nicole Ioannou, Sharelle Seremetkoska, Marika Morris, Jenny Holters, Gael Thomas, Verily Bronwyn, Everett BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Few people with limited English proficiency are provided with the services of a healthcare interpreter when admitted to hospital. This retrospective study utilised health administrative data to explore which patients with limited English proficiency were provided with a healthcare interpreter during their hospital admission. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of health administrative data for adult overnight-stay patients admitted to a public hospital in a region of significant cultural and linguistic diversity in Sydney, Australia in 2014–2015. Descriptive analyses were used to explore demographic and diagnostic data. Chi-square and analysis of variance were used to test for association between variables. RESULTS: The site hospital provided for 19,627 overnight-stay episodes of care over the one year period. Emergency admissions made up 70.5% (n = 13,845) of all hospital admissions and obstetric patients 11.7% (n = 2291). For 15.7% (n = 3074) of episodes of care a healthcare interpreter was identified at hospital admission as being required. In 3.7% (n = 727) of episodes of care a healthcare interpreter was provided. Patients who received an interpreter were more likely to be female, of a younger age and admitted to hospital for childbirth. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of patients with limited English proficiency received a healthcare interpreter during their episode of care. The majority of interpreter services were provided to obstetric patients. BioMed Central 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5946440/ /pubmed/29747659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3135-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blay, Nicole
Ioannou, Sharelle
Seremetkoska, Marika
Morris, Jenny
Holters, Gael
Thomas, Verily
Bronwyn, Everett
Healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data
title Healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data
title_full Healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data
title_fullStr Healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data
title_short Healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data
title_sort healthcare interpreter utilisation: analysis of health administrative data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5946440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29747659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3135-5
work_keys_str_mv AT blaynicole healthcareinterpreterutilisationanalysisofhealthadministrativedata
AT ioannousharelle healthcareinterpreterutilisationanalysisofhealthadministrativedata
AT seremetkoskamarika healthcareinterpreterutilisationanalysisofhealthadministrativedata
AT morrisjenny healthcareinterpreterutilisationanalysisofhealthadministrativedata
AT holtersgael healthcareinterpreterutilisationanalysisofhealthadministrativedata
AT thomasverily healthcareinterpreterutilisationanalysisofhealthadministrativedata
AT bronwyneverett healthcareinterpreterutilisationanalysisofhealthadministrativedata