Cargando…

Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal

Individual foraging specialisation has important ecological implications, but its causes in group‐living species are unclear. One of the major consequences of group living is increased intragroup competition for resources. Foraging theory predicts that with increased competition, individuals should...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheppard, Catherine E., Inger, Richard, McDonald, Robbie A., Barker, Sam, Jackson, Andrew L., Thompson, Faye J., Vitikainen, Emma I. K., Cant, Michael A., Marshall, Harry H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29542220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12933
_version_ 1783322336097730560
author Sheppard, Catherine E.
Inger, Richard
McDonald, Robbie A.
Barker, Sam
Jackson, Andrew L.
Thompson, Faye J.
Vitikainen, Emma I. K.
Cant, Michael A.
Marshall, Harry H.
author_facet Sheppard, Catherine E.
Inger, Richard
McDonald, Robbie A.
Barker, Sam
Jackson, Andrew L.
Thompson, Faye J.
Vitikainen, Emma I. K.
Cant, Michael A.
Marshall, Harry H.
author_sort Sheppard, Catherine E.
collection PubMed
description Individual foraging specialisation has important ecological implications, but its causes in group‐living species are unclear. One of the major consequences of group living is increased intragroup competition for resources. Foraging theory predicts that with increased competition, individuals should add new prey items to their diet, widening their foraging niche (‘optimal foraging hypothesis’). However, classic competition theory suggests the opposite: that increased competition leads to niche partitioning and greater individual foraging specialisation (‘niche partitioning hypothesis’). We tested these opposing predictions in wild, group‐living banded mongooses (Mungos mungo), using stable isotope analysis of banded mongoose whiskers to quantify individual and group foraging niche. Individual foraging niche size declined with increasing group size, despite all groups having a similar overall niche size. Our findings support the prediction that competition promotes niche partitioning within social groups and suggest that individual foraging specialisation may play an important role in the formation of stable social groupings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5947261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59472612018-05-17 Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal Sheppard, Catherine E. Inger, Richard McDonald, Robbie A. Barker, Sam Jackson, Andrew L. Thompson, Faye J. Vitikainen, Emma I. K. Cant, Michael A. Marshall, Harry H. Ecol Lett Letters Individual foraging specialisation has important ecological implications, but its causes in group‐living species are unclear. One of the major consequences of group living is increased intragroup competition for resources. Foraging theory predicts that with increased competition, individuals should add new prey items to their diet, widening their foraging niche (‘optimal foraging hypothesis’). However, classic competition theory suggests the opposite: that increased competition leads to niche partitioning and greater individual foraging specialisation (‘niche partitioning hypothesis’). We tested these opposing predictions in wild, group‐living banded mongooses (Mungos mungo), using stable isotope analysis of banded mongoose whiskers to quantify individual and group foraging niche. Individual foraging niche size declined with increasing group size, despite all groups having a similar overall niche size. Our findings support the prediction that competition promotes niche partitioning within social groups and suggest that individual foraging specialisation may play an important role in the formation of stable social groupings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-14 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5947261/ /pubmed/29542220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12933 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by CNRS and John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Letters
Sheppard, Catherine E.
Inger, Richard
McDonald, Robbie A.
Barker, Sam
Jackson, Andrew L.
Thompson, Faye J.
Vitikainen, Emma I. K.
Cant, Michael A.
Marshall, Harry H.
Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal
title Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal
title_full Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal
title_fullStr Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal
title_full_unstemmed Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal
title_short Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal
title_sort intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group‐living mammal
topic Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29542220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12933
work_keys_str_mv AT sheppardcatherinee intragroupcompetitionpredictsindividualforagingspecialisationinagrouplivingmammal
AT ingerrichard intragroupcompetitionpredictsindividualforagingspecialisationinagrouplivingmammal
AT mcdonaldrobbiea intragroupcompetitionpredictsindividualforagingspecialisationinagrouplivingmammal
AT barkersam intragroupcompetitionpredictsindividualforagingspecialisationinagrouplivingmammal
AT jacksonandrewl intragroupcompetitionpredictsindividualforagingspecialisationinagrouplivingmammal
AT thompsonfayej intragroupcompetitionpredictsindividualforagingspecialisationinagrouplivingmammal
AT vitikainenemmaik intragroupcompetitionpredictsindividualforagingspecialisationinagrouplivingmammal
AT cantmichaela intragroupcompetitionpredictsindividualforagingspecialisationinagrouplivingmammal
AT marshallharryh intragroupcompetitionpredictsindividualforagingspecialisationinagrouplivingmammal