Cargando…

Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study

Procaterol hydrochloride hydrate (procaterol) is a β(2)‐adrenergic receptor agonist that induces a strong bronchodilatory effect. The procaterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been frequently used in patients with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We evaluated the bioequivalen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shirai, Ryo, Suzaki, Yuki, Sato, Kyoko, Takeuchi, Yuko, Tokimatsu, Issei, Koga, Nobuyuki, Kadota, Junichi, Ohashi, Kyoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28884969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.379
_version_ 1783322336566444032
author Shirai, Ryo
Suzaki, Yuki
Sato, Kyoko
Takeuchi, Yuko
Tokimatsu, Issei
Koga, Nobuyuki
Kadota, Junichi
Ohashi, Kyoichi
author_facet Shirai, Ryo
Suzaki, Yuki
Sato, Kyoko
Takeuchi, Yuko
Tokimatsu, Issei
Koga, Nobuyuki
Kadota, Junichi
Ohashi, Kyoichi
author_sort Shirai, Ryo
collection PubMed
description Procaterol hydrochloride hydrate (procaterol) is a β(2)‐adrenergic receptor agonist that induces a strong bronchodilatory effect. The procaterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been frequently used in patients with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We evaluated the bioequivalence and safety between the new procaterol DPI (new DPI) and the approved procaterol DPI (approved DPI). This study was a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, crossover comparison to evaluate the pharmacodynamic equivalence of the new DPI and the approved DPI in patients with bronchial asthma. Primary efficacy variables were area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) during the 480‐minute measurement period. Patients were divided into 2 groups, New‐DPI‐First (n = 8) and Approved‐DPI‐First (n = 8), according to the investigational medical product that was administered first. Patients inhaled 20 μg of procaterol in each period. FEV(1) was measured by a spirometer at predose and at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes after each investigational medical product administration. Equivalence was evaluated by confirming that the 2‐sided 90%CIs for the difference between the new and the approved DPI in means of AUC (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) were within the acceptance criteria of –0.15 to 0.15 L. The difference in means of AUC (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) was 0.041 L and 0.033 L, respectively, and the 90%CI was 0.004 to 0.078 L and –0.008 to 0.074 L, respectively. These CIs were both within the acceptance criteria. The new DPI was assessed as being bioequivalent to the approved DPI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5947263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59472632018-05-17 Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study Shirai, Ryo Suzaki, Yuki Sato, Kyoko Takeuchi, Yuko Tokimatsu, Issei Koga, Nobuyuki Kadota, Junichi Ohashi, Kyoichi Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Articles Procaterol hydrochloride hydrate (procaterol) is a β(2)‐adrenergic receptor agonist that induces a strong bronchodilatory effect. The procaterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been frequently used in patients with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We evaluated the bioequivalence and safety between the new procaterol DPI (new DPI) and the approved procaterol DPI (approved DPI). This study was a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, crossover comparison to evaluate the pharmacodynamic equivalence of the new DPI and the approved DPI in patients with bronchial asthma. Primary efficacy variables were area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) during the 480‐minute measurement period. Patients were divided into 2 groups, New‐DPI‐First (n = 8) and Approved‐DPI‐First (n = 8), according to the investigational medical product that was administered first. Patients inhaled 20 μg of procaterol in each period. FEV(1) was measured by a spirometer at predose and at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes after each investigational medical product administration. Equivalence was evaluated by confirming that the 2‐sided 90%CIs for the difference between the new and the approved DPI in means of AUC (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) were within the acceptance criteria of –0.15 to 0.15 L. The difference in means of AUC (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) was 0.041 L and 0.033 L, respectively, and the 90%CI was 0.004 to 0.078 L and –0.008 to 0.074 L, respectively. These CIs were both within the acceptance criteria. The new DPI was assessed as being bioequivalent to the approved DPI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-08 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5947263/ /pubmed/28884969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.379 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Clinical Pharmacology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Articles
Shirai, Ryo
Suzaki, Yuki
Sato, Kyoko
Takeuchi, Yuko
Tokimatsu, Issei
Koga, Nobuyuki
Kadota, Junichi
Ohashi, Kyoichi
Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study
title Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study
title_full Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study
title_short Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study
title_sort evaluation of bioequivalence between the new procaterol hydrochloride hydrate dry powder inhaler and the approved dry powder inhaler in patients with asthma in a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, crossover comparison study: a phase 3 study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28884969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.379
work_keys_str_mv AT shirairyo evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study
AT suzakiyuki evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study
AT satokyoko evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study
AT takeuchiyuko evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study
AT tokimatsuissei evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study
AT koganobuyuki evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study
AT kadotajunichi evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study
AT ohashikyoichi evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study