Cargando…
Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study
Procaterol hydrochloride hydrate (procaterol) is a β(2)‐adrenergic receptor agonist that induces a strong bronchodilatory effect. The procaterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been frequently used in patients with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We evaluated the bioequivalen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28884969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.379 |
_version_ | 1783322336566444032 |
---|---|
author | Shirai, Ryo Suzaki, Yuki Sato, Kyoko Takeuchi, Yuko Tokimatsu, Issei Koga, Nobuyuki Kadota, Junichi Ohashi, Kyoichi |
author_facet | Shirai, Ryo Suzaki, Yuki Sato, Kyoko Takeuchi, Yuko Tokimatsu, Issei Koga, Nobuyuki Kadota, Junichi Ohashi, Kyoichi |
author_sort | Shirai, Ryo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Procaterol hydrochloride hydrate (procaterol) is a β(2)‐adrenergic receptor agonist that induces a strong bronchodilatory effect. The procaterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been frequently used in patients with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We evaluated the bioequivalence and safety between the new procaterol DPI (new DPI) and the approved procaterol DPI (approved DPI). This study was a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, crossover comparison to evaluate the pharmacodynamic equivalence of the new DPI and the approved DPI in patients with bronchial asthma. Primary efficacy variables were area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) during the 480‐minute measurement period. Patients were divided into 2 groups, New‐DPI‐First (n = 8) and Approved‐DPI‐First (n = 8), according to the investigational medical product that was administered first. Patients inhaled 20 μg of procaterol in each period. FEV(1) was measured by a spirometer at predose and at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes after each investigational medical product administration. Equivalence was evaluated by confirming that the 2‐sided 90%CIs for the difference between the new and the approved DPI in means of AUC (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) were within the acceptance criteria of –0.15 to 0.15 L. The difference in means of AUC (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) was 0.041 L and 0.033 L, respectively, and the 90%CI was 0.004 to 0.078 L and –0.008 to 0.074 L, respectively. These CIs were both within the acceptance criteria. The new DPI was assessed as being bioequivalent to the approved DPI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5947263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59472632018-05-17 Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study Shirai, Ryo Suzaki, Yuki Sato, Kyoko Takeuchi, Yuko Tokimatsu, Issei Koga, Nobuyuki Kadota, Junichi Ohashi, Kyoichi Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev Articles Procaterol hydrochloride hydrate (procaterol) is a β(2)‐adrenergic receptor agonist that induces a strong bronchodilatory effect. The procaterol dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been frequently used in patients with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We evaluated the bioequivalence and safety between the new procaterol DPI (new DPI) and the approved procaterol DPI (approved DPI). This study was a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, crossover comparison to evaluate the pharmacodynamic equivalence of the new DPI and the approved DPI in patients with bronchial asthma. Primary efficacy variables were area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) during the 480‐minute measurement period. Patients were divided into 2 groups, New‐DPI‐First (n = 8) and Approved‐DPI‐First (n = 8), according to the investigational medical product that was administered first. Patients inhaled 20 μg of procaterol in each period. FEV(1) was measured by a spirometer at predose and at 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 480 minutes after each investigational medical product administration. Equivalence was evaluated by confirming that the 2‐sided 90%CIs for the difference between the new and the approved DPI in means of AUC (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) were within the acceptance criteria of –0.15 to 0.15 L. The difference in means of AUC (FEV(1))/h and maximum FEV(1) was 0.041 L and 0.033 L, respectively, and the 90%CI was 0.004 to 0.078 L and –0.008 to 0.074 L, respectively. These CIs were both within the acceptance criteria. The new DPI was assessed as being bioequivalent to the approved DPI. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-08 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5947263/ /pubmed/28884969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.379 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Clinical Pharmacology This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Articles Shirai, Ryo Suzaki, Yuki Sato, Kyoko Takeuchi, Yuko Tokimatsu, Issei Koga, Nobuyuki Kadota, Junichi Ohashi, Kyoichi Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study |
title | Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study |
title_full | Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study |
title_short | Evaluation of Bioequivalence Between the New Procaterol Hydrochloride Hydrate Dry Powder Inhaler and the Approved Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients With Asthma in a Randomized, Double‐Blind, Double‐Dummy, Crossover Comparison Study: A Phase 3 Study |
title_sort | evaluation of bioequivalence between the new procaterol hydrochloride hydrate dry powder inhaler and the approved dry powder inhaler in patients with asthma in a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, crossover comparison study: a phase 3 study |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28884969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shirairyo evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study AT suzakiyuki evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study AT satokyoko evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study AT takeuchiyuko evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study AT tokimatsuissei evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study AT koganobuyuki evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study AT kadotajunichi evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study AT ohashikyoichi evaluationofbioequivalencebetweenthenewprocaterolhydrochloridehydratedrypowderinhalerandtheapproveddrypowderinhalerinpatientswithasthmainarandomizeddoubleblinddoubledummycrossovercomparisonstudyaphase3study |