Cargando…

Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study

The BD FACSVia™ System features novel designs in hardware, software, and instrument QC. We compared the performance of the BD FACSVia System using the BD Leucocount™ kit with the BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. Leucoreduced platelet (PLT, n = 252) and red blood cell (RBC, n = 278) specimens were enr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zeng, Yang, Dabay, Michelle, George, Virginia, Seetharaman, Shalini, de Arruda Indig, Monika, Graminske, Sharon, Kimpel, Nicole, Schmidt, Anna, Boerner, Amanda, Paradiso, Sarai, Delman, Tatyana, Li, Yunyao, Litvak, Viktoriya, Oreizy, Farzad, Chen, Angela, Saleminik, Maryam, Mosqueda, Fred, Lin, Anna, Judge, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29345745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23318
_version_ 1783322413074743296
author Zeng, Yang
Dabay, Michelle
George, Virginia
Seetharaman, Shalini
de Arruda Indig, Monika
Graminske, Sharon
Kimpel, Nicole
Schmidt, Anna
Boerner, Amanda
Paradiso, Sarai
Delman, Tatyana
Li, Yunyao
Litvak, Viktoriya
Oreizy, Farzad
Chen, Angela
Saleminik, Maryam
Mosqueda, Fred
Lin, Anna
Judge, Kevin
author_facet Zeng, Yang
Dabay, Michelle
George, Virginia
Seetharaman, Shalini
de Arruda Indig, Monika
Graminske, Sharon
Kimpel, Nicole
Schmidt, Anna
Boerner, Amanda
Paradiso, Sarai
Delman, Tatyana
Li, Yunyao
Litvak, Viktoriya
Oreizy, Farzad
Chen, Angela
Saleminik, Maryam
Mosqueda, Fred
Lin, Anna
Judge, Kevin
author_sort Zeng, Yang
collection PubMed
description The BD FACSVia™ System features novel designs in hardware, software, and instrument QC. We compared the performance of the BD FACSVia System using the BD Leucocount™ kit with the BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. Leucoreduced platelet (PLT, n = 252) and red blood cell (RBC, n = 278) specimens were enrolled at four sites. Each specimen was stained in four tubes using the BD Leucocount kit reagents and acquired on the two systems. BD Leucocount Control cells (high and low) were used to evaluate the inter‐site reproducibility on the BD FACSVia System at three sites over 20 days. Deming regression and Bland–Altman analysis were performed to determine the WBC absolute counts on the BD FACSVia System vs. the BD FACSCalibur system. Assay accuracy for the range of 0–350 WBCs/µl was adequate. For samples with <25 WBCs/µl, the bias with 95% limits of agreement was 0.136 (–1.897 to 2.169) WBC/µl for PLTs (n = 184) and 0.170 (–2.025 to 2.365) WBC/µl for RBCs (n = 193). For inter‐site reproducibility, the CV% was 6.46% (upper 95% CI 7.16%) for the PLT high control and 9.49% (10.52%) for the PLT low control. The CV% was 7.51% (8.32%) for the RBC high control and 10.76% (11.92%) for the RBC low control. The BD FACSVia System reported equivalent results of WBC absolute counts for leucoreduced PLT and RBC samples compared to the BD FACSCalibur system. The inter‐laboratory reproducibility of the BD FACSVia System met study specifications. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of ISAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5947640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59476402018-05-17 Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study Zeng, Yang Dabay, Michelle George, Virginia Seetharaman, Shalini de Arruda Indig, Monika Graminske, Sharon Kimpel, Nicole Schmidt, Anna Boerner, Amanda Paradiso, Sarai Delman, Tatyana Li, Yunyao Litvak, Viktoriya Oreizy, Farzad Chen, Angela Saleminik, Maryam Mosqueda, Fred Lin, Anna Judge, Kevin Cytometry A Original Articles The BD FACSVia™ System features novel designs in hardware, software, and instrument QC. We compared the performance of the BD FACSVia System using the BD Leucocount™ kit with the BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. Leucoreduced platelet (PLT, n = 252) and red blood cell (RBC, n = 278) specimens were enrolled at four sites. Each specimen was stained in four tubes using the BD Leucocount kit reagents and acquired on the two systems. BD Leucocount Control cells (high and low) were used to evaluate the inter‐site reproducibility on the BD FACSVia System at three sites over 20 days. Deming regression and Bland–Altman analysis were performed to determine the WBC absolute counts on the BD FACSVia System vs. the BD FACSCalibur system. Assay accuracy for the range of 0–350 WBCs/µl was adequate. For samples with <25 WBCs/µl, the bias with 95% limits of agreement was 0.136 (–1.897 to 2.169) WBC/µl for PLTs (n = 184) and 0.170 (–2.025 to 2.365) WBC/µl for RBCs (n = 193). For inter‐site reproducibility, the CV% was 6.46% (upper 95% CI 7.16%) for the PLT high control and 9.49% (10.52%) for the PLT low control. The CV% was 7.51% (8.32%) for the RBC high control and 10.76% (11.92%) for the RBC low control. The BD FACSVia System reported equivalent results of WBC absolute counts for leucoreduced PLT and RBC samples compared to the BD FACSCalibur system. The inter‐laboratory reproducibility of the BD FACSVia System met study specifications. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of ISAC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-18 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5947640/ /pubmed/29345745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23318 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of ISAC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zeng, Yang
Dabay, Michelle
George, Virginia
Seetharaman, Shalini
de Arruda Indig, Monika
Graminske, Sharon
Kimpel, Nicole
Schmidt, Anna
Boerner, Amanda
Paradiso, Sarai
Delman, Tatyana
Li, Yunyao
Litvak, Viktoriya
Oreizy, Farzad
Chen, Angela
Saleminik, Maryam
Mosqueda, Fred
Lin, Anna
Judge, Kevin
Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study
title Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study
title_full Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study
title_short Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study
title_sort comparison of flow cytometric methods for the enumeration of residual leucocytes in leucoreduced blood products: a multicenter study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29345745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23318
work_keys_str_mv AT zengyang comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT dabaymichelle comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT georgevirginia comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT seetharamanshalini comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT dearrudaindigmonika comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT graminskesharon comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT kimpelnicole comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT schmidtanna comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT boerneramanda comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT paradisosarai comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT delmantatyana comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT liyunyao comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT litvakviktoriya comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT oreizyfarzad comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT chenangela comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT saleminikmaryam comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT mosquedafred comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT linanna comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy
AT judgekevin comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy