Cargando…
Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study
The BD FACSVia™ System features novel designs in hardware, software, and instrument QC. We compared the performance of the BD FACSVia System using the BD Leucocount™ kit with the BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. Leucoreduced platelet (PLT, n = 252) and red blood cell (RBC, n = 278) specimens were enr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29345745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23318 |
_version_ | 1783322413074743296 |
---|---|
author | Zeng, Yang Dabay, Michelle George, Virginia Seetharaman, Shalini de Arruda Indig, Monika Graminske, Sharon Kimpel, Nicole Schmidt, Anna Boerner, Amanda Paradiso, Sarai Delman, Tatyana Li, Yunyao Litvak, Viktoriya Oreizy, Farzad Chen, Angela Saleminik, Maryam Mosqueda, Fred Lin, Anna Judge, Kevin |
author_facet | Zeng, Yang Dabay, Michelle George, Virginia Seetharaman, Shalini de Arruda Indig, Monika Graminske, Sharon Kimpel, Nicole Schmidt, Anna Boerner, Amanda Paradiso, Sarai Delman, Tatyana Li, Yunyao Litvak, Viktoriya Oreizy, Farzad Chen, Angela Saleminik, Maryam Mosqueda, Fred Lin, Anna Judge, Kevin |
author_sort | Zeng, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | The BD FACSVia™ System features novel designs in hardware, software, and instrument QC. We compared the performance of the BD FACSVia System using the BD Leucocount™ kit with the BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. Leucoreduced platelet (PLT, n = 252) and red blood cell (RBC, n = 278) specimens were enrolled at four sites. Each specimen was stained in four tubes using the BD Leucocount kit reagents and acquired on the two systems. BD Leucocount Control cells (high and low) were used to evaluate the inter‐site reproducibility on the BD FACSVia System at three sites over 20 days. Deming regression and Bland–Altman analysis were performed to determine the WBC absolute counts on the BD FACSVia System vs. the BD FACSCalibur system. Assay accuracy for the range of 0–350 WBCs/µl was adequate. For samples with <25 WBCs/µl, the bias with 95% limits of agreement was 0.136 (–1.897 to 2.169) WBC/µl for PLTs (n = 184) and 0.170 (–2.025 to 2.365) WBC/µl for RBCs (n = 193). For inter‐site reproducibility, the CV% was 6.46% (upper 95% CI 7.16%) for the PLT high control and 9.49% (10.52%) for the PLT low control. The CV% was 7.51% (8.32%) for the RBC high control and 10.76% (11.92%) for the RBC low control. The BD FACSVia System reported equivalent results of WBC absolute counts for leucoreduced PLT and RBC samples compared to the BD FACSCalibur system. The inter‐laboratory reproducibility of the BD FACSVia System met study specifications. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of ISAC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5947640 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59476402018-05-17 Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study Zeng, Yang Dabay, Michelle George, Virginia Seetharaman, Shalini de Arruda Indig, Monika Graminske, Sharon Kimpel, Nicole Schmidt, Anna Boerner, Amanda Paradiso, Sarai Delman, Tatyana Li, Yunyao Litvak, Viktoriya Oreizy, Farzad Chen, Angela Saleminik, Maryam Mosqueda, Fred Lin, Anna Judge, Kevin Cytometry A Original Articles The BD FACSVia™ System features novel designs in hardware, software, and instrument QC. We compared the performance of the BD FACSVia System using the BD Leucocount™ kit with the BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. Leucoreduced platelet (PLT, n = 252) and red blood cell (RBC, n = 278) specimens were enrolled at four sites. Each specimen was stained in four tubes using the BD Leucocount kit reagents and acquired on the two systems. BD Leucocount Control cells (high and low) were used to evaluate the inter‐site reproducibility on the BD FACSVia System at three sites over 20 days. Deming regression and Bland–Altman analysis were performed to determine the WBC absolute counts on the BD FACSVia System vs. the BD FACSCalibur system. Assay accuracy for the range of 0–350 WBCs/µl was adequate. For samples with <25 WBCs/µl, the bias with 95% limits of agreement was 0.136 (–1.897 to 2.169) WBC/µl for PLTs (n = 184) and 0.170 (–2.025 to 2.365) WBC/µl for RBCs (n = 193). For inter‐site reproducibility, the CV% was 6.46% (upper 95% CI 7.16%) for the PLT high control and 9.49% (10.52%) for the PLT low control. The CV% was 7.51% (8.32%) for the RBC high control and 10.76% (11.92%) for the RBC low control. The BD FACSVia System reported equivalent results of WBC absolute counts for leucoreduced PLT and RBC samples compared to the BD FACSCalibur system. The inter‐laboratory reproducibility of the BD FACSVia System met study specifications. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of ISAC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-18 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5947640/ /pubmed/29345745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23318 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of ISAC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Zeng, Yang Dabay, Michelle George, Virginia Seetharaman, Shalini de Arruda Indig, Monika Graminske, Sharon Kimpel, Nicole Schmidt, Anna Boerner, Amanda Paradiso, Sarai Delman, Tatyana Li, Yunyao Litvak, Viktoriya Oreizy, Farzad Chen, Angela Saleminik, Maryam Mosqueda, Fred Lin, Anna Judge, Kevin Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study |
title | Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study |
title_full | Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study |
title_short | Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study |
title_sort | comparison of flow cytometric methods for the enumeration of residual leucocytes in leucoreduced blood products: a multicenter study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947640/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29345745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23318 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zengyang comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT dabaymichelle comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT georgevirginia comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT seetharamanshalini comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT dearrudaindigmonika comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT graminskesharon comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT kimpelnicole comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT schmidtanna comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT boerneramanda comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT paradisosarai comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT delmantatyana comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT liyunyao comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT litvakviktoriya comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT oreizyfarzad comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT chenangela comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT saleminikmaryam comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT mosquedafred comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT linanna comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy AT judgekevin comparisonofflowcytometricmethodsfortheenumerationofresidualleucocytesinleucoreducedbloodproductsamulticenterstudy |