Cargando…
The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema
PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg plus laser (COMBI) versus laser monotherapy (LASER) in patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME) in either nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13574 |
_version_ | 1783322424249417728 |
---|---|
author | Lang, Gabriele E. Liakopoulos, Sandra Vögeler, Jessica Weiß, Claudia Spital, Georg Gamulescu, Maria‐Andreea Lohmann, Chris Wiedemann, Peter |
author_facet | Lang, Gabriele E. Liakopoulos, Sandra Vögeler, Jessica Weiß, Claudia Spital, Georg Gamulescu, Maria‐Andreea Lohmann, Chris Wiedemann, Peter |
author_sort | Lang, Gabriele E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg plus laser (COMBI) versus laser monotherapy (LASER) in patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME) in either nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and to analyse the relevance of inner versus outer retinal thickness. METHODS: In this double‐masked, multicentre phase IIIb study, patients (N = 128) were randomized (2:1) to receive COMBI (n = 85) versus LASER (n = 43). Patients received four initial monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg (COMBI) or sham (LASER) followed by pro re nata (PRN) injections. In both groups, patients received laser at baseline and additional laser at 3 monthly intervals, as needed. The study was started in 2010 and was prematurely terminated due to approval of ranibizumab for DME. RESULTS: The least squares (LS) mean change in mean best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12 was higher in the COMBI (6.5) versus LASER (2.3) group (LS mean difference: 4.2 [95% CI 0.9; 7.4] letters, p = 0.01, primary end‐point). There was also a tendency in the same direction for the subgroup of 26 patients with PDR (LS mean difference 14.7, p = 0.11). Mean central retinal thickness decreased by 107.3 μm in the COMBI group and by 80.3 μm in the LASER group from baseline to month 12 (p = 0.28). Ranibizumab was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study showed that ranibizumab plus laser is a valuable treatment option for the management of DME. Patients with DME in PDR might also benefit from combined therapy compared to laser alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5947710 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59477102018-05-17 The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema Lang, Gabriele E. Liakopoulos, Sandra Vögeler, Jessica Weiß, Claudia Spital, Georg Gamulescu, Maria‐Andreea Lohmann, Chris Wiedemann, Peter Acta Ophthalmol Original Articles PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg plus laser (COMBI) versus laser monotherapy (LASER) in patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME) in either nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and to analyse the relevance of inner versus outer retinal thickness. METHODS: In this double‐masked, multicentre phase IIIb study, patients (N = 128) were randomized (2:1) to receive COMBI (n = 85) versus LASER (n = 43). Patients received four initial monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg (COMBI) or sham (LASER) followed by pro re nata (PRN) injections. In both groups, patients received laser at baseline and additional laser at 3 monthly intervals, as needed. The study was started in 2010 and was prematurely terminated due to approval of ranibizumab for DME. RESULTS: The least squares (LS) mean change in mean best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12 was higher in the COMBI (6.5) versus LASER (2.3) group (LS mean difference: 4.2 [95% CI 0.9; 7.4] letters, p = 0.01, primary end‐point). There was also a tendency in the same direction for the subgroup of 26 patients with PDR (LS mean difference 14.7, p = 0.11). Mean central retinal thickness decreased by 107.3 μm in the COMBI group and by 80.3 μm in the LASER group from baseline to month 12 (p = 0.28). Ranibizumab was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study showed that ranibizumab plus laser is a valuable treatment option for the management of DME. Patients with DME in PDR might also benefit from combined therapy compared to laser alone. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-01 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5947710/ /pubmed/29090846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13574 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Lang, Gabriele E. Liakopoulos, Sandra Vögeler, Jessica Weiß, Claudia Spital, Georg Gamulescu, Maria‐Andreea Lohmann, Chris Wiedemann, Peter The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema |
title | The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema |
title_full | The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema |
title_fullStr | The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema |
title_full_unstemmed | The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema |
title_short | The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema |
title_sort | relation study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in npdr and pdr patients with diabetic macular oedema |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947710/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13574 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langgabrielee therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT liakopoulossandra therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT vogelerjessica therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT weißclaudia therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT spitalgeorg therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT gamulescumariaandreea therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT lohmannchris therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT wiedemannpeter therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT langgabrielee relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT liakopoulossandra relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT vogelerjessica relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT weißclaudia relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT spitalgeorg relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT gamulescumariaandreea relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT lohmannchris relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema AT wiedemannpeter relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema |