Cargando…

The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg plus laser (COMBI) versus laser monotherapy (LASER) in patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME) in either nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lang, Gabriele E., Liakopoulos, Sandra, Vögeler, Jessica, Weiß, Claudia, Spital, Georg, Gamulescu, Maria‐Andreea, Lohmann, Chris, Wiedemann, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13574
_version_ 1783322424249417728
author Lang, Gabriele E.
Liakopoulos, Sandra
Vögeler, Jessica
Weiß, Claudia
Spital, Georg
Gamulescu, Maria‐Andreea
Lohmann, Chris
Wiedemann, Peter
author_facet Lang, Gabriele E.
Liakopoulos, Sandra
Vögeler, Jessica
Weiß, Claudia
Spital, Georg
Gamulescu, Maria‐Andreea
Lohmann, Chris
Wiedemann, Peter
author_sort Lang, Gabriele E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg plus laser (COMBI) versus laser monotherapy (LASER) in patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME) in either nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and to analyse the relevance of inner versus outer retinal thickness. METHODS: In this double‐masked, multicentre phase IIIb study, patients (N = 128) were randomized (2:1) to receive COMBI (n = 85) versus LASER (n = 43). Patients received four initial monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg (COMBI) or sham (LASER) followed by pro re nata (PRN) injections. In both groups, patients received laser at baseline and additional laser at 3 monthly intervals, as needed. The study was started in 2010 and was prematurely terminated due to approval of ranibizumab for DME. RESULTS: The least squares (LS) mean change in mean best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12 was higher in the COMBI (6.5) versus LASER (2.3) group (LS mean difference: 4.2 [95% CI 0.9; 7.4] letters, p = 0.01, primary end‐point). There was also a tendency in the same direction for the subgroup of 26 patients with PDR (LS mean difference 14.7, p = 0.11). Mean central retinal thickness decreased by 107.3 μm in the COMBI group and by 80.3 μm in the LASER group from baseline to month 12 (p = 0.28). Ranibizumab was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study showed that ranibizumab plus laser is a valuable treatment option for the management of DME. Patients with DME in PDR might also benefit from combined therapy compared to laser alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5947710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59477102018-05-17 The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema Lang, Gabriele E. Liakopoulos, Sandra Vögeler, Jessica Weiß, Claudia Spital, Georg Gamulescu, Maria‐Andreea Lohmann, Chris Wiedemann, Peter Acta Ophthalmol Original Articles PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg plus laser (COMBI) versus laser monotherapy (LASER) in patients with visual impairment due to diabetic macular oedema (DME) in either nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and to analyse the relevance of inner versus outer retinal thickness. METHODS: In this double‐masked, multicentre phase IIIb study, patients (N = 128) were randomized (2:1) to receive COMBI (n = 85) versus LASER (n = 43). Patients received four initial monthly injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg (COMBI) or sham (LASER) followed by pro re nata (PRN) injections. In both groups, patients received laser at baseline and additional laser at 3 monthly intervals, as needed. The study was started in 2010 and was prematurely terminated due to approval of ranibizumab for DME. RESULTS: The least squares (LS) mean change in mean best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 12 was higher in the COMBI (6.5) versus LASER (2.3) group (LS mean difference: 4.2 [95% CI 0.9; 7.4] letters, p = 0.01, primary end‐point). There was also a tendency in the same direction for the subgroup of 26 patients with PDR (LS mean difference 14.7, p = 0.11). Mean central retinal thickness decreased by 107.3 μm in the COMBI group and by 80.3 μm in the LASER group from baseline to month 12 (p = 0.28). Ranibizumab was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This study showed that ranibizumab plus laser is a valuable treatment option for the management of DME. Patients with DME in PDR might also benefit from combined therapy compared to laser alone. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-01 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5947710/ /pubmed/29090846 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13574 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lang, Gabriele E.
Liakopoulos, Sandra
Vögeler, Jessica
Weiß, Claudia
Spital, Georg
Gamulescu, Maria‐Andreea
Lohmann, Chris
Wiedemann, Peter
The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema
title The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema
title_full The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema
title_fullStr The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema
title_full_unstemmed The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema
title_short The RELATION study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in NPDR and PDR patients with diabetic macular oedema
title_sort relation study: efficacy and safety of ranibizumab combined with laser photocoagulation treatment versus laser monotherapy in npdr and pdr patients with diabetic macular oedema
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090846
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.13574
work_keys_str_mv AT langgabrielee therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT liakopoulossandra therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT vogelerjessica therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT weißclaudia therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT spitalgeorg therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT gamulescumariaandreea therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT lohmannchris therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT wiedemannpeter therelationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT langgabrielee relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT liakopoulossandra relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT vogelerjessica relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT weißclaudia relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT spitalgeorg relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT gamulescumariaandreea relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT lohmannchris relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema
AT wiedemannpeter relationstudyefficacyandsafetyofranibizumabcombinedwithlaserphotocoagulationtreatmentversuslasermonotherapyinnpdrandpdrpatientswithdiabeticmacularoedema