Cargando…
Where is crystallography going?
Macromolecular crystallography (MX) has been a motor for biology for over half a century and this continues apace. A series of revolutions, including the production of recombinant proteins and cryo-crystallography, have meant that MX has repeatedly reinvented itself to dramatically increase its reac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29533241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2059798317016709 |
_version_ | 1783322438517391360 |
---|---|
author | Grimes, Jonathan M. Hall, David R. Ashton, Alun W. Evans, Gwyndaf Owen, Robin L. Wagner, Armin McAuley, Katherine E. von Delft, Frank Orville, Allen M. Sorensen, Thomas Walsh, Martin A. Ginn, Helen M. Stuart, David I. |
author_facet | Grimes, Jonathan M. Hall, David R. Ashton, Alun W. Evans, Gwyndaf Owen, Robin L. Wagner, Armin McAuley, Katherine E. von Delft, Frank Orville, Allen M. Sorensen, Thomas Walsh, Martin A. Ginn, Helen M. Stuart, David I. |
author_sort | Grimes, Jonathan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Macromolecular crystallography (MX) has been a motor for biology for over half a century and this continues apace. A series of revolutions, including the production of recombinant proteins and cryo-crystallography, have meant that MX has repeatedly reinvented itself to dramatically increase its reach. Over the last 30 years synchrotron radiation has nucleated a succession of advances, ranging from detectors to optics and automation. These advances, in turn, open up opportunities. For instance, a further order of magnitude could perhaps be gained in signal to noise for general synchrotron experiments. In addition, X-ray free-electron lasers offer to capture fragments of reciprocal space without radiation damage, and open up the subpicosecond regime of protein dynamics and activity. But electrons have recently stolen the limelight: so is X-ray crystallography in rude health, or will imaging methods, especially single-particle electron microscopy, render it obsolete for the most interesting biology, whilst electron diffraction enables structure determination from even the smallest crystals? We will lay out some information to help you decide. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5947779 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | International Union of Crystallography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59477792018-05-15 Where is crystallography going? Grimes, Jonathan M. Hall, David R. Ashton, Alun W. Evans, Gwyndaf Owen, Robin L. Wagner, Armin McAuley, Katherine E. von Delft, Frank Orville, Allen M. Sorensen, Thomas Walsh, Martin A. Ginn, Helen M. Stuart, David I. Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol Research Papers Macromolecular crystallography (MX) has been a motor for biology for over half a century and this continues apace. A series of revolutions, including the production of recombinant proteins and cryo-crystallography, have meant that MX has repeatedly reinvented itself to dramatically increase its reach. Over the last 30 years synchrotron radiation has nucleated a succession of advances, ranging from detectors to optics and automation. These advances, in turn, open up opportunities. For instance, a further order of magnitude could perhaps be gained in signal to noise for general synchrotron experiments. In addition, X-ray free-electron lasers offer to capture fragments of reciprocal space without radiation damage, and open up the subpicosecond regime of protein dynamics and activity. But electrons have recently stolen the limelight: so is X-ray crystallography in rude health, or will imaging methods, especially single-particle electron microscopy, render it obsolete for the most interesting biology, whilst electron diffraction enables structure determination from even the smallest crystals? We will lay out some information to help you decide. International Union of Crystallography 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5947779/ /pubmed/29533241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2059798317016709 Text en © Grimes et al. 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/uk/ |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Grimes, Jonathan M. Hall, David R. Ashton, Alun W. Evans, Gwyndaf Owen, Robin L. Wagner, Armin McAuley, Katherine E. von Delft, Frank Orville, Allen M. Sorensen, Thomas Walsh, Martin A. Ginn, Helen M. Stuart, David I. Where is crystallography going? |
title | Where is crystallography going? |
title_full | Where is crystallography going? |
title_fullStr | Where is crystallography going? |
title_full_unstemmed | Where is crystallography going? |
title_short | Where is crystallography going? |
title_sort | where is crystallography going? |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947779/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29533241 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2059798317016709 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grimesjonathanm whereiscrystallographygoing AT halldavidr whereiscrystallographygoing AT ashtonalunw whereiscrystallographygoing AT evansgwyndaf whereiscrystallographygoing AT owenrobinl whereiscrystallographygoing AT wagnerarmin whereiscrystallographygoing AT mcauleykatherinee whereiscrystallographygoing AT vondelftfrank whereiscrystallographygoing AT orvilleallenm whereiscrystallographygoing AT sorensenthomas whereiscrystallographygoing AT walshmartina whereiscrystallographygoing AT ginnhelenm whereiscrystallographygoing AT stuartdavidi whereiscrystallographygoing |