Cargando…

Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although smoking cessation medications have shown effectiveness in increasing abstinence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is unclear to what extent benefits persist over time. This paper assesses whether the benefits of smoking cessation medications decline over the fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosen, Laura J., Galili, Tal, Kott, Jeffrey, Goodman, Mark, Freedman, Laurence S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29377409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14134
_version_ 1783322449235935232
author Rosen, Laura J.
Galili, Tal
Kott, Jeffrey
Goodman, Mark
Freedman, Laurence S.
author_facet Rosen, Laura J.
Galili, Tal
Kott, Jeffrey
Goodman, Mark
Freedman, Laurence S.
author_sort Rosen, Laura J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although smoking cessation medications have shown effectiveness in increasing abstinence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is unclear to what extent benefits persist over time. This paper assesses whether the benefits of smoking cessation medications decline over the first year. METHODS: We selected studies from three systematic reviews published by the Cochrane Collaboration. RCTs of first‐line smoking cessation medications, with 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up, were eligible for inclusion. Meta‐analysis was used to synthesize information on sustained abstinence (SA) at 6 versus 12 months and 3 versus 6 months, using the risk difference (RD) (‘net benefit’) between intervention and control group quit rates, the relative risk (RR) and the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Sixty‐one studies (27 647 participants) were included. Fewer than 40% of intervention group participants were sustained abstinent at 3 months (bupropion: 37.1%; nicotine replacement therapy (NRT): 34.8%; varenicline: 39.3%); approximately a quarter were sustained abstinent at 6 months (bupropion: 25.9%; NRT: 26.6%; varenicline: 25.4%), and approximately a fifth were sustained abstinent at 12 months (bupropion: 19.9%; NRT: 19.8%%; varenicline: 18.7%). There was only a small decline in RR (3 months: 1.95 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.74–2.18, P < 0.0001]; 6 months: 1.87 (95% CI = 1.67–2.08 P < 0.0001); 12 months: 1.75 (95% CI = 1.56–1.95, P < 0.0001) between intervention and control groups over time, but a substantial decline in net benefit [3 months: RD = 17.3% (14.5–20.1%); 6 months: RD = 11.8% (10.0–13.7%); 12 months: RD = 8.2% (6.8–9.6%)]. The decline in net benefit was statistically significant between 3 and 6 [RD = 4.95% (95% CI = 3.49–6.41%), P < 0.0001] and 6 and 12 months [RD = 3.00% (95% CI = 2.36%–3.64%), P < 0.0001)] for medications combined and individual medications. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of smokers who use smoking cessation medications who benefit from doing so decreases during the course of the first year, but a net benefit still remains at 12 months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5947828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59478282018-05-17 Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials Rosen, Laura J. Galili, Tal Kott, Jeffrey Goodman, Mark Freedman, Laurence S. Addiction Review BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although smoking cessation medications have shown effectiveness in increasing abstinence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is unclear to what extent benefits persist over time. This paper assesses whether the benefits of smoking cessation medications decline over the first year. METHODS: We selected studies from three systematic reviews published by the Cochrane Collaboration. RCTs of first‐line smoking cessation medications, with 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up, were eligible for inclusion. Meta‐analysis was used to synthesize information on sustained abstinence (SA) at 6 versus 12 months and 3 versus 6 months, using the risk difference (RD) (‘net benefit’) between intervention and control group quit rates, the relative risk (RR) and the odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: Sixty‐one studies (27 647 participants) were included. Fewer than 40% of intervention group participants were sustained abstinent at 3 months (bupropion: 37.1%; nicotine replacement therapy (NRT): 34.8%; varenicline: 39.3%); approximately a quarter were sustained abstinent at 6 months (bupropion: 25.9%; NRT: 26.6%; varenicline: 25.4%), and approximately a fifth were sustained abstinent at 12 months (bupropion: 19.9%; NRT: 19.8%%; varenicline: 18.7%). There was only a small decline in RR (3 months: 1.95 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.74–2.18, P < 0.0001]; 6 months: 1.87 (95% CI = 1.67–2.08 P < 0.0001); 12 months: 1.75 (95% CI = 1.56–1.95, P < 0.0001) between intervention and control groups over time, but a substantial decline in net benefit [3 months: RD = 17.3% (14.5–20.1%); 6 months: RD = 11.8% (10.0–13.7%); 12 months: RD = 8.2% (6.8–9.6%)]. The decline in net benefit was statistically significant between 3 and 6 [RD = 4.95% (95% CI = 3.49–6.41%), P < 0.0001] and 6 and 12 months [RD = 3.00% (95% CI = 2.36%–3.64%), P < 0.0001)] for medications combined and individual medications. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of smokers who use smoking cessation medications who benefit from doing so decreases during the course of the first year, but a net benefit still remains at 12 months. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-29 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5947828/ /pubmed/29377409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14134 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review
Rosen, Laura J.
Galili, Tal
Kott, Jeffrey
Goodman, Mark
Freedman, Laurence S.
Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort diminishing benefit of smoking cessation medications during the first year: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29377409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.14134
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenlauraj diminishingbenefitofsmokingcessationmedicationsduringthefirstyearametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT galilital diminishingbenefitofsmokingcessationmedicationsduringthefirstyearametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kottjeffrey diminishingbenefitofsmokingcessationmedicationsduringthefirstyearametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT goodmanmark diminishingbenefitofsmokingcessationmedicationsduringthefirstyearametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT freedmanlaurences diminishingbenefitofsmokingcessationmedicationsduringthefirstyearametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials