Cargando…

Is saltmarsh restoration success constrained by matching natural environments or altered succession? A test using niche models

1. Restored habitats, such as saltmarsh created through managed realignment, sometimes fail to meet targets for biological equivalence with natural reference sites. Understanding why this happens is important in order to improve restoration outcomes. 2. Elevation in the tidal frame and sediment redo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sullivan, Martin J. P., Davy, Anthony J., Grant, Alastair, Mossman, Hannah L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13033
_version_ 1783322449921703936
author Sullivan, Martin J. P.
Davy, Anthony J.
Grant, Alastair
Mossman, Hannah L.
author_facet Sullivan, Martin J. P.
Davy, Anthony J.
Grant, Alastair
Mossman, Hannah L.
author_sort Sullivan, Martin J. P.
collection PubMed
description 1. Restored habitats, such as saltmarsh created through managed realignment, sometimes fail to meet targets for biological equivalence with natural reference sites. Understanding why this happens is important in order to improve restoration outcomes. 2. Elevation in the tidal frame and sediment redox potential are major controls on the distribution of saltmarsh plants. We use niche models to characterize 10 species’ responses to these, and test whether differences in species occurrence between restored and natural saltmarshes in the UK result from failure to recreate adequate environmental conditions. 3. Six species occurred less frequently in recently restored marshes than natural marshes. Failure of restored marshes to achieve the elevation and redox conditions of natural marshes partially explained the underrepresentation of five of these species, but did not explain patterns of occurrence on older (>50 years) restored marshes. 4. For all species, an effect of marsh age remained after controlling for differences in environmental conditions. This could be due to differences in successional mechanism between restored and natural marshes. In recently restored marshes, high‐marsh species occurred lower in the tidal frame and low‐marsh species occurred higher in the tidal frame than in natural marshes. This supports the hypothesis that competition is initially weaker in restored marshes, because of the availability of bare sediment across the whole tidal frame. Species that establish outside their normal realized niche, such as Atriplex portulacoides, may inhibit subsequent colonization of other species that occurred less frequently than expected on older restored marshes. 5. Synthesis and applications. Niche models can be used to test whether abiotic differences between restored sites and their natural counterparts are responsible for discrepancies in species occurrence. In saltmarshes, simply replicating environmental conditions will not result in equivalent species occurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5947831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59478312018-05-17 Is saltmarsh restoration success constrained by matching natural environments or altered succession? A test using niche models Sullivan, Martin J. P. Davy, Anthony J. Grant, Alastair Mossman, Hannah L. J Appl Ecol Restoration 1. Restored habitats, such as saltmarsh created through managed realignment, sometimes fail to meet targets for biological equivalence with natural reference sites. Understanding why this happens is important in order to improve restoration outcomes. 2. Elevation in the tidal frame and sediment redox potential are major controls on the distribution of saltmarsh plants. We use niche models to characterize 10 species’ responses to these, and test whether differences in species occurrence between restored and natural saltmarshes in the UK result from failure to recreate adequate environmental conditions. 3. Six species occurred less frequently in recently restored marshes than natural marshes. Failure of restored marshes to achieve the elevation and redox conditions of natural marshes partially explained the underrepresentation of five of these species, but did not explain patterns of occurrence on older (>50 years) restored marshes. 4. For all species, an effect of marsh age remained after controlling for differences in environmental conditions. This could be due to differences in successional mechanism between restored and natural marshes. In recently restored marshes, high‐marsh species occurred lower in the tidal frame and low‐marsh species occurred higher in the tidal frame than in natural marshes. This supports the hypothesis that competition is initially weaker in restored marshes, because of the availability of bare sediment across the whole tidal frame. Species that establish outside their normal realized niche, such as Atriplex portulacoides, may inhibit subsequent colonization of other species that occurred less frequently than expected on older restored marshes. 5. Synthesis and applications. Niche models can be used to test whether abiotic differences between restored sites and their natural counterparts are responsible for discrepancies in species occurrence. In saltmarshes, simply replicating environmental conditions will not result in equivalent species occurrence. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-11-22 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5947831/ /pubmed/29780171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13033 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Restoration
Sullivan, Martin J. P.
Davy, Anthony J.
Grant, Alastair
Mossman, Hannah L.
Is saltmarsh restoration success constrained by matching natural environments or altered succession? A test using niche models
title Is saltmarsh restoration success constrained by matching natural environments or altered succession? A test using niche models
title_full Is saltmarsh restoration success constrained by matching natural environments or altered succession? A test using niche models
title_fullStr Is saltmarsh restoration success constrained by matching natural environments or altered succession? A test using niche models
title_full_unstemmed Is saltmarsh restoration success constrained by matching natural environments or altered succession? A test using niche models
title_short Is saltmarsh restoration success constrained by matching natural environments or altered succession? A test using niche models
title_sort is saltmarsh restoration success constrained by matching natural environments or altered succession? a test using niche models
topic Restoration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13033
work_keys_str_mv AT sullivanmartinjp issaltmarshrestorationsuccessconstrainedbymatchingnaturalenvironmentsoralteredsuccessionatestusingnichemodels
AT davyanthonyj issaltmarshrestorationsuccessconstrainedbymatchingnaturalenvironmentsoralteredsuccessionatestusingnichemodels
AT grantalastair issaltmarshrestorationsuccessconstrainedbymatchingnaturalenvironmentsoralteredsuccessionatestusingnichemodels
AT mossmanhannahl issaltmarshrestorationsuccessconstrainedbymatchingnaturalenvironmentsoralteredsuccessionatestusingnichemodels