Cargando…
Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency
OBJECTIVE: To investigate methods and processes for timely, efficient and good quality peer review of research funding proposals in health. METHODS: A two-stage evidence synthesis: (1) a systematic map to describe the key characteristics of the evidence base, followed by (2) a systematic review of t...
Autores principales: | Shepherd, Jonathan, Frampton, Geoff K., Pickett, Karen, Wyatt, Jeremy C. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5947897/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196914 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map
por: Frampton, Geoff K., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
por: Barnett, Adrian G, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Influence of external peer reviewer scores for funding applications on funding board decisions: a retrospective analysis of 1561 reviews
por: Sorrell, Lexy, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Evaluation of stakeholder views on peer review of NIHR applications for funding: a qualitative study
por: Turner, Sheila, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)