Cargando…
Comparison between Modelled and Measured Magnetic Field Scans of Different Planar Coil Topologies for Stress Sensor Applications
The investigation of planar coils of differing topologies, when combined with a magnetostrictive amorphous ribbon to form a stress-sensitive self-inductor, is an active research area for applications as stress or pressure sensors. Four topologies of planar coil (Circular, Mesh, Meander, and Square)...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5948503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29561809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18040931 |
_version_ | 1783322564226973696 |
---|---|
author | Gibbs, Robert Moreton, Gregory Meydan, Turgut Williams, Paul |
author_facet | Gibbs, Robert Moreton, Gregory Meydan, Turgut Williams, Paul |
author_sort | Gibbs, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | The investigation of planar coils of differing topologies, when combined with a magnetostrictive amorphous ribbon to form a stress-sensitive self-inductor, is an active research area for applications as stress or pressure sensors. Four topologies of planar coil (Circular, Mesh, Meander, and Square) have been constructed using copper track on 30 mm wide PCB substrate. The coils are energized to draw 0.4 A and the resulting magnetic field distribution is observed with a newly developed three-dimensional magnetic field scanner. The system is based on a variably angled Micromagnetics(®) STJ-020 tunneling magneto-resistance sensor with a spatial resolution of 5–10 µm and sensitivity to fields of less than 10 A/m. These experimental results are compared with the fields computed by ANSYS Maxwell(®) finite element modelling of the same topologies. Measured field shape and strength correspond well with the results of modelling, including direct observation of corner and edge effects. Three-dimensional analysis of the field shape produced by the square coil, isolating the components H((x)) and H((z)), is compared with the three-dimensional field solutions from modelling. The finite element modelling is validated and the accuracy and utility of the new system for three-dimensional scanning of general stray fields is confirmed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5948503 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59485032018-05-17 Comparison between Modelled and Measured Magnetic Field Scans of Different Planar Coil Topologies for Stress Sensor Applications Gibbs, Robert Moreton, Gregory Meydan, Turgut Williams, Paul Sensors (Basel) Article The investigation of planar coils of differing topologies, when combined with a magnetostrictive amorphous ribbon to form a stress-sensitive self-inductor, is an active research area for applications as stress or pressure sensors. Four topologies of planar coil (Circular, Mesh, Meander, and Square) have been constructed using copper track on 30 mm wide PCB substrate. The coils are energized to draw 0.4 A and the resulting magnetic field distribution is observed with a newly developed three-dimensional magnetic field scanner. The system is based on a variably angled Micromagnetics(®) STJ-020 tunneling magneto-resistance sensor with a spatial resolution of 5–10 µm and sensitivity to fields of less than 10 A/m. These experimental results are compared with the fields computed by ANSYS Maxwell(®) finite element modelling of the same topologies. Measured field shape and strength correspond well with the results of modelling, including direct observation of corner and edge effects. Three-dimensional analysis of the field shape produced by the square coil, isolating the components H((x)) and H((z)), is compared with the three-dimensional field solutions from modelling. The finite element modelling is validated and the accuracy and utility of the new system for three-dimensional scanning of general stray fields is confirmed. MDPI 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5948503/ /pubmed/29561809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18040931 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Gibbs, Robert Moreton, Gregory Meydan, Turgut Williams, Paul Comparison between Modelled and Measured Magnetic Field Scans of Different Planar Coil Topologies for Stress Sensor Applications |
title | Comparison between Modelled and Measured Magnetic Field Scans of Different Planar Coil Topologies for Stress Sensor Applications |
title_full | Comparison between Modelled and Measured Magnetic Field Scans of Different Planar Coil Topologies for Stress Sensor Applications |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Modelled and Measured Magnetic Field Scans of Different Planar Coil Topologies for Stress Sensor Applications |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Modelled and Measured Magnetic Field Scans of Different Planar Coil Topologies for Stress Sensor Applications |
title_short | Comparison between Modelled and Measured Magnetic Field Scans of Different Planar Coil Topologies for Stress Sensor Applications |
title_sort | comparison between modelled and measured magnetic field scans of different planar coil topologies for stress sensor applications |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5948503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29561809 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18040931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gibbsrobert comparisonbetweenmodelledandmeasuredmagneticfieldscansofdifferentplanarcoiltopologiesforstresssensorapplications AT moretongregory comparisonbetweenmodelledandmeasuredmagneticfieldscansofdifferentplanarcoiltopologiesforstresssensorapplications AT meydanturgut comparisonbetweenmodelledandmeasuredmagneticfieldscansofdifferentplanarcoiltopologiesforstresssensorapplications AT williamspaul comparisonbetweenmodelledandmeasuredmagneticfieldscansofdifferentplanarcoiltopologiesforstresssensorapplications |