Cargando…

Automated Quality Control for Sensor Based Symptom Measurement Performed Outside the Lab

The use of wearable sensing technology for objective, non-invasive and remote clinimetric testing of symptoms has considerable potential. However, the accuracy achievable with such technology is highly reliant on separating the useful from irrelevant sensor data. Monitoring patient symptoms using di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badawy, Reham, Raykov, Yordan P., Evers, Luc J. W., Bloem, Bastiaan R., Faber, Marjan J., Zhan, Andong, Claes, Kasper, Little, Max A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5948536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18041215
_version_ 1783322571793498112
author Badawy, Reham
Raykov, Yordan P.
Evers, Luc J. W.
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
Faber, Marjan J.
Zhan, Andong
Claes, Kasper
Little, Max A.
author_facet Badawy, Reham
Raykov, Yordan P.
Evers, Luc J. W.
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
Faber, Marjan J.
Zhan, Andong
Claes, Kasper
Little, Max A.
author_sort Badawy, Reham
collection PubMed
description The use of wearable sensing technology for objective, non-invasive and remote clinimetric testing of symptoms has considerable potential. However, the accuracy achievable with such technology is highly reliant on separating the useful from irrelevant sensor data. Monitoring patient symptoms using digital sensors outside of controlled, clinical lab settings creates a variety of practical challenges, such as recording unexpected user behaviors. These behaviors often violate the assumptions of clinimetric testing protocols, where these protocols are designed to probe for specific symptoms. Such violations are frequent outside the lab and affect the accuracy of the subsequent data analysis and scientific conclusions. To address these problems, we report on a unified algorithmic framework for automated sensor data quality control, which can identify those parts of the sensor data that are sufficiently reliable for further analysis. Combining both parametric and nonparametric signal processing and machine learning techniques, we demonstrate that across 100 subjects and 300 clinimetric tests from three different types of behavioral clinimetric protocols, the system shows an average segmentation accuracy of around 90%. By extracting reliable sensor data, it is possible to strip the data of confounding factors in the environment that may threaten reproducibility and replicability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5948536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59485362018-05-17 Automated Quality Control for Sensor Based Symptom Measurement Performed Outside the Lab Badawy, Reham Raykov, Yordan P. Evers, Luc J. W. Bloem, Bastiaan R. Faber, Marjan J. Zhan, Andong Claes, Kasper Little, Max A. Sensors (Basel) Article The use of wearable sensing technology for objective, non-invasive and remote clinimetric testing of symptoms has considerable potential. However, the accuracy achievable with such technology is highly reliant on separating the useful from irrelevant sensor data. Monitoring patient symptoms using digital sensors outside of controlled, clinical lab settings creates a variety of practical challenges, such as recording unexpected user behaviors. These behaviors often violate the assumptions of clinimetric testing protocols, where these protocols are designed to probe for specific symptoms. Such violations are frequent outside the lab and affect the accuracy of the subsequent data analysis and scientific conclusions. To address these problems, we report on a unified algorithmic framework for automated sensor data quality control, which can identify those parts of the sensor data that are sufficiently reliable for further analysis. Combining both parametric and nonparametric signal processing and machine learning techniques, we demonstrate that across 100 subjects and 300 clinimetric tests from three different types of behavioral clinimetric protocols, the system shows an average segmentation accuracy of around 90%. By extracting reliable sensor data, it is possible to strip the data of confounding factors in the environment that may threaten reproducibility and replicability. MDPI 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5948536/ /pubmed/29659528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18041215 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Badawy, Reham
Raykov, Yordan P.
Evers, Luc J. W.
Bloem, Bastiaan R.
Faber, Marjan J.
Zhan, Andong
Claes, Kasper
Little, Max A.
Automated Quality Control for Sensor Based Symptom Measurement Performed Outside the Lab
title Automated Quality Control for Sensor Based Symptom Measurement Performed Outside the Lab
title_full Automated Quality Control for Sensor Based Symptom Measurement Performed Outside the Lab
title_fullStr Automated Quality Control for Sensor Based Symptom Measurement Performed Outside the Lab
title_full_unstemmed Automated Quality Control for Sensor Based Symptom Measurement Performed Outside the Lab
title_short Automated Quality Control for Sensor Based Symptom Measurement Performed Outside the Lab
title_sort automated quality control for sensor based symptom measurement performed outside the lab
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5948536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18041215
work_keys_str_mv AT badawyreham automatedqualitycontrolforsensorbasedsymptommeasurementperformedoutsidethelab
AT raykovyordanp automatedqualitycontrolforsensorbasedsymptommeasurementperformedoutsidethelab
AT everslucjw automatedqualitycontrolforsensorbasedsymptommeasurementperformedoutsidethelab
AT bloembastiaanr automatedqualitycontrolforsensorbasedsymptommeasurementperformedoutsidethelab
AT fabermarjanj automatedqualitycontrolforsensorbasedsymptommeasurementperformedoutsidethelab
AT zhanandong automatedqualitycontrolforsensorbasedsymptommeasurementperformedoutsidethelab
AT claeskasper automatedqualitycontrolforsensorbasedsymptommeasurementperformedoutsidethelab
AT littlemaxa automatedqualitycontrolforsensorbasedsymptommeasurementperformedoutsidethelab