Cargando…

An Analysis of the Extent of Social Inclusion and Equity Consideration in Malawi’s National HIV and AIDS Policy Review Process

Background: Equity and social inclusion for vulnerable groups in policy development processes and resulting documents remain a challenge globally. Most often, the marginalization of vulnerable groups is overlooked in both the planning and practice of health service delivery. Such marginalization may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chinyama, Mathews Junior, MacLachlan, Malcolm, McVeigh, Joanne, Huss, Tessy, Gawamadzi, Sylvester
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5949220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29626397
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.87
_version_ 1783322703908831232
author Chinyama, Mathews Junior
MacLachlan, Malcolm
McVeigh, Joanne
Huss, Tessy
Gawamadzi, Sylvester
author_facet Chinyama, Mathews Junior
MacLachlan, Malcolm
McVeigh, Joanne
Huss, Tessy
Gawamadzi, Sylvester
author_sort Chinyama, Mathews Junior
collection PubMed
description Background: Equity and social inclusion for vulnerable groups in policy development processes and resulting documents remain a challenge globally. Most often, the marginalization of vulnerable groups is overlooked in both the planning and practice of health service delivery. Such marginalization may occur because authorities deem the targeting of those who already have better access to healthcare a cheaper and easier way to achieve short-term health gains. The Government of Malawi wishes to achieve an equitable and inclusive HIV and AIDS Policy. The aim of this study is to assess the extent to which the Malawi Policy review process addressed regional and international health priorities of equity and social inclusion for vulnerable groups in the policy content and policy revision process. Methods: This research design comprised two phases. First, the content of the Malawi HIV and AIDS Policy was assessed using EquiFrame regarding its coverage of 21 Core Concepts of human rights and inclusion of 12 Vulnerable Groups. Second, the engagement of vulnerable groups in the policy process was assessed using the EquIPP matrix. For the latter, 10 interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of representatives of public sector, civil society organizations and development partners who participated in the policy revision process. Data was also collected from documented information of the policy processes. Results: Our analyses indicated that the Malawi HIV and AIDS Policy had a relatively high coverage of Core Concepts of human rights and Vulnerable Groups; although with some notable omissions. The analyses also found that reasonable steps were taken to engage and promote participation of vulnerable groups in the planning, development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation processes of the HIV and AIDS Policy, although again, with some notable exceptions. This is the first study to use both EquiFrame and EquIPP as complimentary tools to assess the content and process of policy. Conclusion: While the findings indicate inclusive processes, commitment to Core Concepts of human rights and inclusion of Vulnerable Groups in relation to the Malawi HIV and AIDS Policy, the results also point to areas in which social inclusion and equity could be further strengthened.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5949220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59492202018-05-16 An Analysis of the Extent of Social Inclusion and Equity Consideration in Malawi’s National HIV and AIDS Policy Review Process Chinyama, Mathews Junior MacLachlan, Malcolm McVeigh, Joanne Huss, Tessy Gawamadzi, Sylvester Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: Equity and social inclusion for vulnerable groups in policy development processes and resulting documents remain a challenge globally. Most often, the marginalization of vulnerable groups is overlooked in both the planning and practice of health service delivery. Such marginalization may occur because authorities deem the targeting of those who already have better access to healthcare a cheaper and easier way to achieve short-term health gains. The Government of Malawi wishes to achieve an equitable and inclusive HIV and AIDS Policy. The aim of this study is to assess the extent to which the Malawi Policy review process addressed regional and international health priorities of equity and social inclusion for vulnerable groups in the policy content and policy revision process. Methods: This research design comprised two phases. First, the content of the Malawi HIV and AIDS Policy was assessed using EquiFrame regarding its coverage of 21 Core Concepts of human rights and inclusion of 12 Vulnerable Groups. Second, the engagement of vulnerable groups in the policy process was assessed using the EquIPP matrix. For the latter, 10 interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of representatives of public sector, civil society organizations and development partners who participated in the policy revision process. Data was also collected from documented information of the policy processes. Results: Our analyses indicated that the Malawi HIV and AIDS Policy had a relatively high coverage of Core Concepts of human rights and Vulnerable Groups; although with some notable omissions. The analyses also found that reasonable steps were taken to engage and promote participation of vulnerable groups in the planning, development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation processes of the HIV and AIDS Policy, although again, with some notable exceptions. This is the first study to use both EquiFrame and EquIPP as complimentary tools to assess the content and process of policy. Conclusion: While the findings indicate inclusive processes, commitment to Core Concepts of human rights and inclusion of Vulnerable Groups in relation to the Malawi HIV and AIDS Policy, the results also point to areas in which social inclusion and equity could be further strengthened. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2017-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5949220/ /pubmed/29626397 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.87 Text en © 2018 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chinyama, Mathews Junior
MacLachlan, Malcolm
McVeigh, Joanne
Huss, Tessy
Gawamadzi, Sylvester
An Analysis of the Extent of Social Inclusion and Equity Consideration in Malawi’s National HIV and AIDS Policy Review Process
title An Analysis of the Extent of Social Inclusion and Equity Consideration in Malawi’s National HIV and AIDS Policy Review Process
title_full An Analysis of the Extent of Social Inclusion and Equity Consideration in Malawi’s National HIV and AIDS Policy Review Process
title_fullStr An Analysis of the Extent of Social Inclusion and Equity Consideration in Malawi’s National HIV and AIDS Policy Review Process
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of the Extent of Social Inclusion and Equity Consideration in Malawi’s National HIV and AIDS Policy Review Process
title_short An Analysis of the Extent of Social Inclusion and Equity Consideration in Malawi’s National HIV and AIDS Policy Review Process
title_sort analysis of the extent of social inclusion and equity consideration in malawi’s national hiv and aids policy review process
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5949220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29626397
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.87
work_keys_str_mv AT chinyamamathewsjunior ananalysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess
AT maclachlanmalcolm ananalysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess
AT mcveighjoanne ananalysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess
AT husstessy ananalysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess
AT gawamadzisylvester ananalysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess
AT chinyamamathewsjunior analysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess
AT maclachlanmalcolm analysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess
AT mcveighjoanne analysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess
AT husstessy analysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess
AT gawamadzisylvester analysisoftheextentofsocialinclusionandequityconsiderationinmalawisnationalhivandaidspolicyreviewprocess