Cargando…

Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context

Accurate control of interpersonal distances in social contexts is an important determinant of effective social interactions. Although comfortable interpersonal distance seems to be dependent on social factors such as the gender, age and activity of the confederates, it also seems to be modulated by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cartaud, Alice, Ruggiero, Gennaro, Ott, Laurent, Iachini, Tina, Coello, Yann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5949865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29867639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00657
_version_ 1783322791625359360
author Cartaud, Alice
Ruggiero, Gennaro
Ott, Laurent
Iachini, Tina
Coello, Yann
author_facet Cartaud, Alice
Ruggiero, Gennaro
Ott, Laurent
Iachini, Tina
Coello, Yann
author_sort Cartaud, Alice
collection PubMed
description Accurate control of interpersonal distances in social contexts is an important determinant of effective social interactions. Although comfortable interpersonal distance seems to be dependent on social factors such as the gender, age and activity of the confederates, it also seems to be modulated by the way we represent our peripersonal-action space. To test this hypothesis, the present study investigated the relation between the emotional responses registered through electrodermal activity (EDA) triggered by human-like point-light displays (PLDs) carrying different facial expressions (neutral, angry, happy) when located in the participants peripersonal or extrapersonal space, and the comfort distance with the same PLDs when approaching and crossing the participants fronto-parallel axis on the right or left side. The results show an increase of the phasic EDA for PLDs with angry facial expressions located in the peripersonal space (reachability judgment task), in comparison to the same PLDs located in the extrapersonal space, which was not observed for PLDs with neutral or happy facial expressions. The results also show an increase of the comfort distance for PLDs approaching the participants with an angry facial expression (interpersonal comfort distance judgment task), in comparison to PLDs with happy and neutral ones, which was related to the increase of the physiological response. Overall, the findings indicate that comfort social space can be predicted from the emotional reaction triggered by a confederate when located within the observer’s peripersonal space. This suggests that peripersonal-action space and interpersonal-social space are similarly sensitive to the emotional valence of the confederate, which could reflect a common adaptive mechanism in specifying theses spaces to subtend interactions with both the physical and social environment, but also to ensure body protection from potential threats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5949865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59498652018-06-04 Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context Cartaud, Alice Ruggiero, Gennaro Ott, Laurent Iachini, Tina Coello, Yann Front Psychol Psychology Accurate control of interpersonal distances in social contexts is an important determinant of effective social interactions. Although comfortable interpersonal distance seems to be dependent on social factors such as the gender, age and activity of the confederates, it also seems to be modulated by the way we represent our peripersonal-action space. To test this hypothesis, the present study investigated the relation between the emotional responses registered through electrodermal activity (EDA) triggered by human-like point-light displays (PLDs) carrying different facial expressions (neutral, angry, happy) when located in the participants peripersonal or extrapersonal space, and the comfort distance with the same PLDs when approaching and crossing the participants fronto-parallel axis on the right or left side. The results show an increase of the phasic EDA for PLDs with angry facial expressions located in the peripersonal space (reachability judgment task), in comparison to the same PLDs located in the extrapersonal space, which was not observed for PLDs with neutral or happy facial expressions. The results also show an increase of the comfort distance for PLDs approaching the participants with an angry facial expression (interpersonal comfort distance judgment task), in comparison to PLDs with happy and neutral ones, which was related to the increase of the physiological response. Overall, the findings indicate that comfort social space can be predicted from the emotional reaction triggered by a confederate when located within the observer’s peripersonal space. This suggests that peripersonal-action space and interpersonal-social space are similarly sensitive to the emotional valence of the confederate, which could reflect a common adaptive mechanism in specifying theses spaces to subtend interactions with both the physical and social environment, but also to ensure body protection from potential threats. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5949865/ /pubmed/29867639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00657 Text en Copyright © 2018 Cartaud, Ruggiero, Ott, Iachini and Coello. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Cartaud, Alice
Ruggiero, Gennaro
Ott, Laurent
Iachini, Tina
Coello, Yann
Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context
title Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context
title_full Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context
title_fullStr Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context
title_full_unstemmed Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context
title_short Physiological Response to Facial Expressions in Peripersonal Space Determines Interpersonal Distance in a Social Interaction Context
title_sort physiological response to facial expressions in peripersonal space determines interpersonal distance in a social interaction context
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5949865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29867639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00657
work_keys_str_mv AT cartaudalice physiologicalresponsetofacialexpressionsinperipersonalspacedeterminesinterpersonaldistanceinasocialinteractioncontext
AT ruggierogennaro physiologicalresponsetofacialexpressionsinperipersonalspacedeterminesinterpersonaldistanceinasocialinteractioncontext
AT ottlaurent physiologicalresponsetofacialexpressionsinperipersonalspacedeterminesinterpersonaldistanceinasocialinteractioncontext
AT iachinitina physiologicalresponsetofacialexpressionsinperipersonalspacedeterminesinterpersonaldistanceinasocialinteractioncontext
AT coelloyann physiologicalresponsetofacialexpressionsinperipersonalspacedeterminesinterpersonaldistanceinasocialinteractioncontext