Cargando…

Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization

BACKGROUND: Patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) may face important decisions regarding treatment options, with the “right choice” depending on the relative weights of risks and benefits. Studies performed as discrete choice experiments are used to estimate these weights, and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva, Monteiro, Andrea Liborio, Tura, Bernardo Rangel, Oliveira, Claudia Silvia Rocha, Rebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira, Pereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780241
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S164550
_version_ 1783322983659470848
author Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva
Monteiro, Andrea Liborio
Tura, Bernardo Rangel
Oliveira, Claudia Silvia Rocha
Rebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira
Pereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar
author_facet Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva
Monteiro, Andrea Liborio
Tura, Bernardo Rangel
Oliveira, Claudia Silvia Rocha
Rebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira
Pereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar
author_sort Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) may face important decisions regarding treatment options, with the “right choice” depending on the relative weights of risks and benefits. Studies performed as discrete choice experiments are used to estimate these weights, and attribute selection is an essential step in the design of these studies. Attributes not included in the design cannot be analyzed. In this study, we aimed to elicit, rank, and rate attributes that may be considered important to patients and physicians who must choose between angioplasty and surgery for coronary revascularization. METHODS: The elicitation process involved performing a systematic review to search for attributes cited in declared preference studies in addition to face-to-face interviews with cardiologists and experts. The interviews were audio-recorded in digital format, and the collected data were transcribed and searched to identify new attributes. The criterion used to finish the data collection process was sampling saturation. RESULTS: A systematic review resulted in the selection of the following 14 attributes: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, incision scar, length of stay, long-term survival, myocardial infarction, periprocedural death, postoperative infection, postprocedural angina, pseudoaneurysm, renal failure, repeat coronary artery bypass grafting, repeat percutaneous coronary intervention, and stroke. The interviews added no new attributes. After rating, we identified significant differences in the values that patients and cardiologists placed on renal insufficiency (p<0.001), periprocedural death (p<0.001), and long-term survival (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Decisions regarding the best treatment option for patients with CAD should be made based on differences in risk and the patient’s preference regarding the most relevant endpoints. We elicited, ranked, and rated 14 attributes related to CAD treatment options. This list of attributes may help researchers who seek to perform future preference studies of CAD treatment options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5951133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59511332018-05-18 Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva Monteiro, Andrea Liborio Tura, Bernardo Rangel Oliveira, Claudia Silvia Rocha Rebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira Pereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) may face important decisions regarding treatment options, with the “right choice” depending on the relative weights of risks and benefits. Studies performed as discrete choice experiments are used to estimate these weights, and attribute selection is an essential step in the design of these studies. Attributes not included in the design cannot be analyzed. In this study, we aimed to elicit, rank, and rate attributes that may be considered important to patients and physicians who must choose between angioplasty and surgery for coronary revascularization. METHODS: The elicitation process involved performing a systematic review to search for attributes cited in declared preference studies in addition to face-to-face interviews with cardiologists and experts. The interviews were audio-recorded in digital format, and the collected data were transcribed and searched to identify new attributes. The criterion used to finish the data collection process was sampling saturation. RESULTS: A systematic review resulted in the selection of the following 14 attributes: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, incision scar, length of stay, long-term survival, myocardial infarction, periprocedural death, postoperative infection, postprocedural angina, pseudoaneurysm, renal failure, repeat coronary artery bypass grafting, repeat percutaneous coronary intervention, and stroke. The interviews added no new attributes. After rating, we identified significant differences in the values that patients and cardiologists placed on renal insufficiency (p<0.001), periprocedural death (p<0.001), and long-term survival (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Decisions regarding the best treatment option for patients with CAD should be made based on differences in risk and the patient’s preference regarding the most relevant endpoints. We elicited, ranked, and rated 14 attributes related to CAD treatment options. This list of attributes may help researchers who seek to perform future preference studies of CAD treatment options. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5951133/ /pubmed/29780241 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S164550 Text en © 2018 Magliano et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva
Monteiro, Andrea Liborio
Tura, Bernardo Rangel
Oliveira, Claudia Silvia Rocha
Rebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira
Pereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar
Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization
title Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization
title_full Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization
title_fullStr Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization
title_full_unstemmed Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization
title_short Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization
title_sort patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780241
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S164550
work_keys_str_mv AT maglianocarlosalbertodasilva patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization
AT monteiroandrealiborio patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization
AT turabernardorangel patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization
AT oliveiraclaudiasilviarocha patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization
AT rebeloamandarebecadeoliveira patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization
AT pereiraclaudiacristinadeaguiar patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization