Cargando…
Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization
BACKGROUND: Patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) may face important decisions regarding treatment options, with the “right choice” depending on the relative weights of risks and benefits. Studies performed as discrete choice experiments are used to estimate these weights, and a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780241 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S164550 |
_version_ | 1783322983659470848 |
---|---|
author | Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva Monteiro, Andrea Liborio Tura, Bernardo Rangel Oliveira, Claudia Silvia Rocha Rebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira Pereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar |
author_facet | Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva Monteiro, Andrea Liborio Tura, Bernardo Rangel Oliveira, Claudia Silvia Rocha Rebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira Pereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar |
author_sort | Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) may face important decisions regarding treatment options, with the “right choice” depending on the relative weights of risks and benefits. Studies performed as discrete choice experiments are used to estimate these weights, and attribute selection is an essential step in the design of these studies. Attributes not included in the design cannot be analyzed. In this study, we aimed to elicit, rank, and rate attributes that may be considered important to patients and physicians who must choose between angioplasty and surgery for coronary revascularization. METHODS: The elicitation process involved performing a systematic review to search for attributes cited in declared preference studies in addition to face-to-face interviews with cardiologists and experts. The interviews were audio-recorded in digital format, and the collected data were transcribed and searched to identify new attributes. The criterion used to finish the data collection process was sampling saturation. RESULTS: A systematic review resulted in the selection of the following 14 attributes: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, incision scar, length of stay, long-term survival, myocardial infarction, periprocedural death, postoperative infection, postprocedural angina, pseudoaneurysm, renal failure, repeat coronary artery bypass grafting, repeat percutaneous coronary intervention, and stroke. The interviews added no new attributes. After rating, we identified significant differences in the values that patients and cardiologists placed on renal insufficiency (p<0.001), periprocedural death (p<0.001), and long-term survival (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Decisions regarding the best treatment option for patients with CAD should be made based on differences in risk and the patient’s preference regarding the most relevant endpoints. We elicited, ranked, and rated 14 attributes related to CAD treatment options. This list of attributes may help researchers who seek to perform future preference studies of CAD treatment options. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5951133 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59511332018-05-18 Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva Monteiro, Andrea Liborio Tura, Bernardo Rangel Oliveira, Claudia Silvia Rocha Rebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira Pereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Patients with a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) may face important decisions regarding treatment options, with the “right choice” depending on the relative weights of risks and benefits. Studies performed as discrete choice experiments are used to estimate these weights, and attribute selection is an essential step in the design of these studies. Attributes not included in the design cannot be analyzed. In this study, we aimed to elicit, rank, and rate attributes that may be considered important to patients and physicians who must choose between angioplasty and surgery for coronary revascularization. METHODS: The elicitation process involved performing a systematic review to search for attributes cited in declared preference studies in addition to face-to-face interviews with cardiologists and experts. The interviews were audio-recorded in digital format, and the collected data were transcribed and searched to identify new attributes. The criterion used to finish the data collection process was sampling saturation. RESULTS: A systematic review resulted in the selection of the following 14 attributes: atrial fibrillation, heart failure, incision scar, length of stay, long-term survival, myocardial infarction, periprocedural death, postoperative infection, postprocedural angina, pseudoaneurysm, renal failure, repeat coronary artery bypass grafting, repeat percutaneous coronary intervention, and stroke. The interviews added no new attributes. After rating, we identified significant differences in the values that patients and cardiologists placed on renal insufficiency (p<0.001), periprocedural death (p<0.001), and long-term survival (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Decisions regarding the best treatment option for patients with CAD should be made based on differences in risk and the patient’s preference regarding the most relevant endpoints. We elicited, ranked, and rated 14 attributes related to CAD treatment options. This list of attributes may help researchers who seek to perform future preference studies of CAD treatment options. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5951133/ /pubmed/29780241 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S164550 Text en © 2018 Magliano et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Magliano, Carlos Alberto da Silva Monteiro, Andrea Liborio Tura, Bernardo Rangel Oliveira, Claudia Silvia Rocha Rebelo, Amanda Rebeca de Oliveira Pereira, Claudia Cristina de Aguiar Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization |
title | Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization |
title_full | Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization |
title_fullStr | Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization |
title_short | Patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization |
title_sort | patient and physician preferences for attributes of coronary revascularization |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951133/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780241 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S164550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maglianocarlosalbertodasilva patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization AT monteiroandrealiborio patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization AT turabernardorangel patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization AT oliveiraclaudiasilviarocha patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization AT rebeloamandarebecadeoliveira patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization AT pereiraclaudiacristinadeaguiar patientandphysicianpreferencesforattributesofcoronaryrevascularization |