Cargando…
Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model
The aim of this study was to evaluate osseointegration and crestal bone height in implants with a triangular cervical design in comparison with a standard rounded cervical design. The control group consisted of 24 implants with a standard cervical design, and the test group of 24 implants with a tri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29561788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11040462 |
_version_ | 1783322999182589952 |
---|---|
author | Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos Maté Sánchez De Val, José Eduardo Ramos Oltra, María Luisa Fernández Domínguez, Manuel Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis |
author_facet | Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos Maté Sánchez De Val, José Eduardo Ramos Oltra, María Luisa Fernández Domínguez, Manuel Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis |
author_sort | Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to evaluate osseointegration and crestal bone height in implants with a triangular cervical design in comparison with a standard rounded cervical design. The control group consisted of 24 implants with a standard cervical design, and the test group of 24 implants with a triangular cervical design. The implants were inserted in healed bone in six American Foxhounds. Crestal bone height and tissue thickness in the cervical portion were measured after 12 weeks healing. Data analysis found mean crestal bone loss of: 0.31 ± 0.24 mm on the buccal side, 0.35 ± 0.14 mm on the lingual in the test group, and 0.71 ± 0.28 mm buccal loss, and 0.42 ± 0.30 mm lingual in the control group; with statistically significant differences on the buccal aspect (p = 0.0019). Mean tissue thickness in the test group was 1.98 ± 0.17 mm on the buccal aspect, and 2.43 ± 0.93 mm in the lingual; in the control group it was 2.48 ± 0.61 mm buccal thickness, and 2.88 ± 0.14 mm lingual, with significant differences on both aspects (p = 0.0043; p = 0.0029). The results suggest that greater thickness of peri-implant tissue can be expected when the triangular cervical implant design is used rather than the standard cervical design. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5951308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59513082018-05-15 Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos Maté Sánchez De Val, José Eduardo Ramos Oltra, María Luisa Fernández Domínguez, Manuel Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate osseointegration and crestal bone height in implants with a triangular cervical design in comparison with a standard rounded cervical design. The control group consisted of 24 implants with a standard cervical design, and the test group of 24 implants with a triangular cervical design. The implants were inserted in healed bone in six American Foxhounds. Crestal bone height and tissue thickness in the cervical portion were measured after 12 weeks healing. Data analysis found mean crestal bone loss of: 0.31 ± 0.24 mm on the buccal side, 0.35 ± 0.14 mm on the lingual in the test group, and 0.71 ± 0.28 mm buccal loss, and 0.42 ± 0.30 mm lingual in the control group; with statistically significant differences on the buccal aspect (p = 0.0019). Mean tissue thickness in the test group was 1.98 ± 0.17 mm on the buccal aspect, and 2.43 ± 0.93 mm in the lingual; in the control group it was 2.48 ± 0.61 mm buccal thickness, and 2.88 ± 0.14 mm lingual, with significant differences on both aspects (p = 0.0043; p = 0.0029). The results suggest that greater thickness of peri-implant tissue can be expected when the triangular cervical implant design is used rather than the standard cervical design. MDPI 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5951308/ /pubmed/29561788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11040462 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos Maté Sánchez De Val, José Eduardo Ramos Oltra, María Luisa Fernández Domínguez, Manuel Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model |
title | Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model |
title_full | Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model |
title_short | Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model |
title_sort | evaluation of a new dental implant cervical design in comparison with a conventional design in an experimental american foxhound model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29561788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11040462 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perezalbacetemartinezmariaangeles evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel AT perezalbacetemartinezcarlos evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel AT matesanchezdevaljoseeduardo evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel AT ramosoltramarialuisa evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel AT fernandezdominguezmanuel evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel AT calvoguiradojoseluis evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel |