Cargando…

Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model

The aim of this study was to evaluate osseointegration and crestal bone height in implants with a triangular cervical design in comparison with a standard rounded cervical design. The control group consisted of 24 implants with a standard cervical design, and the test group of 24 implants with a tri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles, Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos, Maté Sánchez De Val, José Eduardo, Ramos Oltra, María Luisa, Fernández Domínguez, Manuel, Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29561788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11040462
_version_ 1783322999182589952
author Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles
Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos
Maté Sánchez De Val, José Eduardo
Ramos Oltra, María Luisa
Fernández Domínguez, Manuel
Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis
author_facet Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles
Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos
Maté Sánchez De Val, José Eduardo
Ramos Oltra, María Luisa
Fernández Domínguez, Manuel
Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis
author_sort Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to evaluate osseointegration and crestal bone height in implants with a triangular cervical design in comparison with a standard rounded cervical design. The control group consisted of 24 implants with a standard cervical design, and the test group of 24 implants with a triangular cervical design. The implants were inserted in healed bone in six American Foxhounds. Crestal bone height and tissue thickness in the cervical portion were measured after 12 weeks healing. Data analysis found mean crestal bone loss of: 0.31 ± 0.24 mm on the buccal side, 0.35 ± 0.14 mm on the lingual in the test group, and 0.71 ± 0.28 mm buccal loss, and 0.42 ± 0.30 mm lingual in the control group; with statistically significant differences on the buccal aspect (p = 0.0019). Mean tissue thickness in the test group was 1.98 ± 0.17 mm on the buccal aspect, and 2.43 ± 0.93 mm in the lingual; in the control group it was 2.48 ± 0.61 mm buccal thickness, and 2.88 ± 0.14 mm lingual, with significant differences on both aspects (p = 0.0043; p = 0.0029). The results suggest that greater thickness of peri-implant tissue can be expected when the triangular cervical implant design is used rather than the standard cervical design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5951308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59513082018-05-15 Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos Maté Sánchez De Val, José Eduardo Ramos Oltra, María Luisa Fernández Domínguez, Manuel Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis Materials (Basel) Article The aim of this study was to evaluate osseointegration and crestal bone height in implants with a triangular cervical design in comparison with a standard rounded cervical design. The control group consisted of 24 implants with a standard cervical design, and the test group of 24 implants with a triangular cervical design. The implants were inserted in healed bone in six American Foxhounds. Crestal bone height and tissue thickness in the cervical portion were measured after 12 weeks healing. Data analysis found mean crestal bone loss of: 0.31 ± 0.24 mm on the buccal side, 0.35 ± 0.14 mm on the lingual in the test group, and 0.71 ± 0.28 mm buccal loss, and 0.42 ± 0.30 mm lingual in the control group; with statistically significant differences on the buccal aspect (p = 0.0019). Mean tissue thickness in the test group was 1.98 ± 0.17 mm on the buccal aspect, and 2.43 ± 0.93 mm in the lingual; in the control group it was 2.48 ± 0.61 mm buccal thickness, and 2.88 ± 0.14 mm lingual, with significant differences on both aspects (p = 0.0043; p = 0.0029). The results suggest that greater thickness of peri-implant tissue can be expected when the triangular cervical implant design is used rather than the standard cervical design. MDPI 2018-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5951308/ /pubmed/29561788 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11040462 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Maria Ángeles
Pérez-Albacete Martínez, Carlos
Maté Sánchez De Val, José Eduardo
Ramos Oltra, María Luisa
Fernández Domínguez, Manuel
Calvo Guirado, Jose Luis
Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model
title Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model
title_full Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model
title_fullStr Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model
title_short Evaluation of a New Dental Implant Cervical Design in Comparison with a Conventional Design in an Experimental American Foxhound Model
title_sort evaluation of a new dental implant cervical design in comparison with a conventional design in an experimental american foxhound model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29561788
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma11040462
work_keys_str_mv AT perezalbacetemartinezmariaangeles evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel
AT perezalbacetemartinezcarlos evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel
AT matesanchezdevaljoseeduardo evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel
AT ramosoltramarialuisa evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel
AT fernandezdominguezmanuel evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel
AT calvoguiradojoseluis evaluationofanewdentalimplantcervicaldesignincomparisonwithaconventionaldesigninanexperimentalamericanfoxhoundmodel