Cargando…
Changes in macular pigment optical density after membrane peeling
INTRODUCTION: To highlight the differences in macular pigment optical density (MPOD) between eyes with vitreoretinal interface syndrome and healthy control eyes, to assess the changes in MPOD in eyes treated with macular peeling, to investigate the relationships between MPOD changes and measures of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29758035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197034 |
_version_ | 1783323045843173376 |
---|---|
author | Romano, Mario R. Cennamo, Gilda Grassi, Piergiacomo Sparnelli, Federica Allegrini, Davide Cennamo, Giovanni |
author_facet | Romano, Mario R. Cennamo, Gilda Grassi, Piergiacomo Sparnelli, Federica Allegrini, Davide Cennamo, Giovanni |
author_sort | Romano, Mario R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To highlight the differences in macular pigment optical density (MPOD) between eyes with vitreoretinal interface syndrome and healthy control eyes, to assess the changes in MPOD in eyes treated with macular peeling, to investigate the relationships between MPOD changes and measures of retinal sensitivity such as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and microperimetry. METHODS: In this cross-sectional comparative study, 30 eyes affected by idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM, 15eyes) or full-thickness macular hole (FTMH, 15eyes) were compared with 60 eyes from 30 healthy age-matched patients. MPOD values (mean MPOD, maximum MPOD, MPOD area, and MPOD volume) were measured in a range of 4°–7° of eccentricity around the fovea, using the one-wavelength reflectometry method (Visucam 200, Carl-Zeiss Meditec). Patients affected by iERM and FTMH were treated with vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane-inner limiting membrane (ERM-ILM) peeling, with follow-up examinations performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The main outcome measures were the differences in MPOD between eyes with vitreoretinal interface syndrome and healthy eyes, changes in MPOD after ERM-ILM peeling, and relationships between MPOD and functional changes. RESULTS: Mean MPOD differed significantly between control eyes and those with iERM (P = .0001) or FTMH (P = .0006). The max MPOD and MPOD area increased, but not significantly. After peeling, the only significant change in MPOD was in MPOD volume (P = .01). In the ERM group, postoperative mean MPOD correlated significantly with best-corrected visual acuity (r = .739, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: MPOD was reduced in patients with iERM or FTMH compared with healthy eyes. We found a significant correlation between the mean postoperative MPOD and postoperative BCVA, hypothesizing that the postoperative increase in mean MPOD could be due to a change in distribution for unfolding and expansion of the fovea after the peeling. MOPD may be considered as a prognostic factor associated with a good visual prognosis in patients with iERM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5951543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59515432018-05-25 Changes in macular pigment optical density after membrane peeling Romano, Mario R. Cennamo, Gilda Grassi, Piergiacomo Sparnelli, Federica Allegrini, Davide Cennamo, Giovanni PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: To highlight the differences in macular pigment optical density (MPOD) between eyes with vitreoretinal interface syndrome and healthy control eyes, to assess the changes in MPOD in eyes treated with macular peeling, to investigate the relationships between MPOD changes and measures of retinal sensitivity such as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and microperimetry. METHODS: In this cross-sectional comparative study, 30 eyes affected by idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM, 15eyes) or full-thickness macular hole (FTMH, 15eyes) were compared with 60 eyes from 30 healthy age-matched patients. MPOD values (mean MPOD, maximum MPOD, MPOD area, and MPOD volume) were measured in a range of 4°–7° of eccentricity around the fovea, using the one-wavelength reflectometry method (Visucam 200, Carl-Zeiss Meditec). Patients affected by iERM and FTMH were treated with vitrectomy and epiretinal membrane-inner limiting membrane (ERM-ILM) peeling, with follow-up examinations performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The main outcome measures were the differences in MPOD between eyes with vitreoretinal interface syndrome and healthy eyes, changes in MPOD after ERM-ILM peeling, and relationships between MPOD and functional changes. RESULTS: Mean MPOD differed significantly between control eyes and those with iERM (P = .0001) or FTMH (P = .0006). The max MPOD and MPOD area increased, but not significantly. After peeling, the only significant change in MPOD was in MPOD volume (P = .01). In the ERM group, postoperative mean MPOD correlated significantly with best-corrected visual acuity (r = .739, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: MPOD was reduced in patients with iERM or FTMH compared with healthy eyes. We found a significant correlation between the mean postoperative MPOD and postoperative BCVA, hypothesizing that the postoperative increase in mean MPOD could be due to a change in distribution for unfolding and expansion of the fovea after the peeling. MOPD may be considered as a prognostic factor associated with a good visual prognosis in patients with iERM. Public Library of Science 2018-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5951543/ /pubmed/29758035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197034 Text en © 2018 Romano et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Romano, Mario R. Cennamo, Gilda Grassi, Piergiacomo Sparnelli, Federica Allegrini, Davide Cennamo, Giovanni Changes in macular pigment optical density after membrane peeling |
title | Changes in macular pigment optical density after membrane peeling |
title_full | Changes in macular pigment optical density after membrane peeling |
title_fullStr | Changes in macular pigment optical density after membrane peeling |
title_full_unstemmed | Changes in macular pigment optical density after membrane peeling |
title_short | Changes in macular pigment optical density after membrane peeling |
title_sort | changes in macular pigment optical density after membrane peeling |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29758035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romanomarior changesinmacularpigmentopticaldensityaftermembranepeeling AT cennamogilda changesinmacularpigmentopticaldensityaftermembranepeeling AT grassipiergiacomo changesinmacularpigmentopticaldensityaftermembranepeeling AT sparnellifederica changesinmacularpigmentopticaldensityaftermembranepeeling AT allegrinidavide changesinmacularpigmentopticaldensityaftermembranepeeling AT cennamogiovanni changesinmacularpigmentopticaldensityaftermembranepeeling |