Cargando…

A Psittacosis Outbreak among English Office Workers with Little or No Contact with Birds, August 2015

INTRODUCTION: On 14th August 2015 an office manager informed Public Health England of five employees known to have been diagnosed with pneumonia over the previous three weeks. We investigated to establish whether an outbreak occurred and to identify and control the source of infection. METHODS: We u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mair-Jenkins, John, Lamming, Tracey, Dziadosz, Andy, Flecknoe, Daniel, Stubington, Thomas, Mentasti, Massimo, Muir, Peter, Monk, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.b646c3bb2b4f0e3397183f31823bbca6
_version_ 1783323065069862912
author Mair-Jenkins, John
Lamming, Tracey
Dziadosz, Andy
Flecknoe, Daniel
Stubington, Thomas
Mentasti, Massimo
Muir, Peter
Monk, Philip
author_facet Mair-Jenkins, John
Lamming, Tracey
Dziadosz, Andy
Flecknoe, Daniel
Stubington, Thomas
Mentasti, Massimo
Muir, Peter
Monk, Philip
author_sort Mair-Jenkins, John
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: On 14th August 2015 an office manager informed Public Health England of five employees known to have been diagnosed with pneumonia over the previous three weeks. We investigated to establish whether an outbreak occurred and to identify and control the source of infection. METHODS: We undertook case finding for self-reported pneumonia cases at local businesses (July-August 2015). Clinical samples from a hospitalised case were tested for common respiratory pathogens, but returned negative results. Further testing confirmed Chlamydia psittaci infection in this case (serology and PCR).  We subsequently undertook C. psittaci testing for all cases, redefining them as confirmed (C. psittaci PCR or high antibody titre via serology) or probable (inconclusive C. psittaci serology). Twenty-eight day exposure histories informed descriptive epidemiological analysis. We conducted an environmental investigation at the office to identify potential sources of exposure. RESULTS: We identified six office workers with pneumonia; four met case definitions (three confirmed, one probable) with symptom onset between 29th July and 4th August 2015. Workplace was the only epidemiological link and only one case reported limited, indirect bird contact. Environmental investigations identified pigeons roosting near the office which were being fed by workers (none cases). DISCUSSION: This was a probable outbreak of psittacosis with no direct bird-to-human contact reported. Cases recovered after receiving appropriate antibiotics. Feeding of pigeons was stopped. A deep clean of office ventilation systems was conducted and workers were advised to avoid bird contact.  We hypothesised that indirect environmental exposure to infected pigeons was to the source of this outbreak. This work provides evidence that health professionals should consider psittacosis in the differential diagnosis of cases of severe or atypical respiratory illness even without overt bird contact.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5951689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59516892018-05-30 A Psittacosis Outbreak among English Office Workers with Little or No Contact with Birds, August 2015 Mair-Jenkins, John Lamming, Tracey Dziadosz, Andy Flecknoe, Daniel Stubington, Thomas Mentasti, Massimo Muir, Peter Monk, Philip PLoS Curr Research Article INTRODUCTION: On 14th August 2015 an office manager informed Public Health England of five employees known to have been diagnosed with pneumonia over the previous three weeks. We investigated to establish whether an outbreak occurred and to identify and control the source of infection. METHODS: We undertook case finding for self-reported pneumonia cases at local businesses (July-August 2015). Clinical samples from a hospitalised case were tested for common respiratory pathogens, but returned negative results. Further testing confirmed Chlamydia psittaci infection in this case (serology and PCR).  We subsequently undertook C. psittaci testing for all cases, redefining them as confirmed (C. psittaci PCR or high antibody titre via serology) or probable (inconclusive C. psittaci serology). Twenty-eight day exposure histories informed descriptive epidemiological analysis. We conducted an environmental investigation at the office to identify potential sources of exposure. RESULTS: We identified six office workers with pneumonia; four met case definitions (three confirmed, one probable) with symptom onset between 29th July and 4th August 2015. Workplace was the only epidemiological link and only one case reported limited, indirect bird contact. Environmental investigations identified pigeons roosting near the office which were being fed by workers (none cases). DISCUSSION: This was a probable outbreak of psittacosis with no direct bird-to-human contact reported. Cases recovered after receiving appropriate antibiotics. Feeding of pigeons was stopped. A deep clean of office ventilation systems was conducted and workers were advised to avoid bird contact.  We hypothesised that indirect environmental exposure to infected pigeons was to the source of this outbreak. This work provides evidence that health professionals should consider psittacosis in the differential diagnosis of cases of severe or atypical respiratory illness even without overt bird contact. Public Library of Science 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5951689/ /pubmed/29854568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.b646c3bb2b4f0e3397183f31823bbca6 Text en © 2018 Mair-Jenkins, Lamming, Dziadosz, Flecknoe, Stubington, Mentasti, Muir, Monk, et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mair-Jenkins, John
Lamming, Tracey
Dziadosz, Andy
Flecknoe, Daniel
Stubington, Thomas
Mentasti, Massimo
Muir, Peter
Monk, Philip
A Psittacosis Outbreak among English Office Workers with Little or No Contact with Birds, August 2015
title A Psittacosis Outbreak among English Office Workers with Little or No Contact with Birds, August 2015
title_full A Psittacosis Outbreak among English Office Workers with Little or No Contact with Birds, August 2015
title_fullStr A Psittacosis Outbreak among English Office Workers with Little or No Contact with Birds, August 2015
title_full_unstemmed A Psittacosis Outbreak among English Office Workers with Little or No Contact with Birds, August 2015
title_short A Psittacosis Outbreak among English Office Workers with Little or No Contact with Birds, August 2015
title_sort psittacosis outbreak among english office workers with little or no contact with birds, august 2015
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5951689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29854568
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.b646c3bb2b4f0e3397183f31823bbca6
work_keys_str_mv AT mairjenkinsjohn apsittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT lammingtracey apsittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT dziadoszandy apsittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT flecknoedaniel apsittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT stubingtonthomas apsittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT mentastimassimo apsittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT muirpeter apsittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT monkphilip apsittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT mairjenkinsjohn psittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT lammingtracey psittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT dziadoszandy psittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT flecknoedaniel psittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT stubingtonthomas psittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT mentastimassimo psittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT muirpeter psittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015
AT monkphilip psittacosisoutbreakamongenglishofficeworkerswithlittleornocontactwithbirdsaugust2015