Cargando…

Should all patients receive dual chamber pacing ICDs? The rationale for the DAVID trial

All of the prospective multicenter trials that support the use of implantable defibrillators have used single chamber pacemakers/implantable cardiovertor defibrillators (ICDs). Despite the significantly increased cost of dual chamber pacemaker/ICD devices and the lack of outcome data, these devices...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wilkoff, Bruce L
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-5-215
_version_ 1782120063985254400
author Wilkoff, Bruce L
author_facet Wilkoff, Bruce L
author_sort Wilkoff, Bruce L
collection PubMed
description All of the prospective multicenter trials that support the use of implantable defibrillators have used single chamber pacemakers/implantable cardiovertor defibrillators (ICDs). Despite the significantly increased cost of dual chamber pacemaker/ICD devices and the lack of outcome data, these devices accounted for approximately two-thirds of the ICDs implanted in the United States during the 12 months ending April 2001. Dual chamber pacemaker trials have not provided data that would support this trend, but the high incidence of atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and congestive heart failure, as comorbid conditions, suggest that the situation could be different in the defibrillator patient population. The DAVID (Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator) trial is designed to measure the incremental benefit of dual chamber pacemaker/ICDs.
format Text
id pubmed-59522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-595222001-11-06 Should all patients receive dual chamber pacing ICDs? The rationale for the DAVID trial Wilkoff, Bruce L Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary All of the prospective multicenter trials that support the use of implantable defibrillators have used single chamber pacemakers/implantable cardiovertor defibrillators (ICDs). Despite the significantly increased cost of dual chamber pacemaker/ICD devices and the lack of outcome data, these devices accounted for approximately two-thirds of the ICDs implanted in the United States during the 12 months ending April 2001. Dual chamber pacemaker trials have not provided data that would support this trend, but the high incidence of atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and congestive heart failure, as comorbid conditions, suggest that the situation could be different in the defibrillator patient population. The DAVID (Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator) trial is designed to measure the incremental benefit of dual chamber pacemaker/ICDs. BioMed Central 2001 2001-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC59522/ /pubmed/11806799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-5-215 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Wilkoff, Bruce L
Should all patients receive dual chamber pacing ICDs? The rationale for the DAVID trial
title Should all patients receive dual chamber pacing ICDs? The rationale for the DAVID trial
title_full Should all patients receive dual chamber pacing ICDs? The rationale for the DAVID trial
title_fullStr Should all patients receive dual chamber pacing ICDs? The rationale for the DAVID trial
title_full_unstemmed Should all patients receive dual chamber pacing ICDs? The rationale for the DAVID trial
title_short Should all patients receive dual chamber pacing ICDs? The rationale for the DAVID trial
title_sort should all patients receive dual chamber pacing icds? the rationale for the david trial
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-5-215
work_keys_str_mv AT wilkoffbrucel shouldallpatientsreceivedualchamberpacingicdstherationaleforthedavidtrial