Cargando…

At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection

The use of D-dimer assay to screen for aortic dissection has become routine in clinical practice. Although an uncommon disease entity, aortic dissection is rapidly fatal without prompt diagnosis, and biochemical detection in the proper clinical context is crucial. We performed a retrospective chart...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zlatopolsky, Maxim, Brancheau, Daniel, Zughaib, Marcel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050313X18774639
_version_ 1783323154911854592
author Zlatopolsky, Maxim
Brancheau, Daniel
Zughaib, Marcel
author_facet Zlatopolsky, Maxim
Brancheau, Daniel
Zughaib, Marcel
author_sort Zlatopolsky, Maxim
collection PubMed
description The use of D-dimer assay to screen for aortic dissection has become routine in clinical practice. Although an uncommon disease entity, aortic dissection is rapidly fatal without prompt diagnosis, and biochemical detection in the proper clinical context is crucial. We performed a retrospective chart review of all aortic dissections presenting to a community tertiary care center between 2000 and 2016 and identified three patients in whom laboratory D-dimer testing was positive and a diagnosis of Stanford Type A aortic dissection was confirmed with computed tomography angiography based on clinical assessment and a newly validated risk stratification tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59522782018-05-18 At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection Zlatopolsky, Maxim Brancheau, Daniel Zughaib, Marcel SAGE Open Med Case Rep Case Report The use of D-dimer assay to screen for aortic dissection has become routine in clinical practice. Although an uncommon disease entity, aortic dissection is rapidly fatal without prompt diagnosis, and biochemical detection in the proper clinical context is crucial. We performed a retrospective chart review of all aortic dissections presenting to a community tertiary care center between 2000 and 2016 and identified three patients in whom laboratory D-dimer testing was positive and a diagnosis of Stanford Type A aortic dissection was confirmed with computed tomography angiography based on clinical assessment and a newly validated risk stratification tool. SAGE Publications 2018-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5952278/ /pubmed/29780589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050313X18774639 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Case Report
Zlatopolsky, Maxim
Brancheau, Daniel
Zughaib, Marcel
At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection
title At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection
title_full At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection
title_fullStr At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection
title_full_unstemmed At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection
title_short At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection
title_sort at the “threshold” of certainty: risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780589
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050313X18774639
work_keys_str_mv AT zlatopolskymaxim atthethresholdofcertaintyriskstratificationandclinicalassessmentincongruityinthediagnosisofaorticdissection
AT brancheaudaniel atthethresholdofcertaintyriskstratificationandclinicalassessmentincongruityinthediagnosisofaorticdissection
AT zughaibmarcel atthethresholdofcertaintyriskstratificationandclinicalassessmentincongruityinthediagnosisofaorticdissection