Cargando…
At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection
The use of D-dimer assay to screen for aortic dissection has become routine in clinical practice. Although an uncommon disease entity, aortic dissection is rapidly fatal without prompt diagnosis, and biochemical detection in the proper clinical context is crucial. We performed a retrospective chart...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050313X18774639 |
_version_ | 1783323154911854592 |
---|---|
author | Zlatopolsky, Maxim Brancheau, Daniel Zughaib, Marcel |
author_facet | Zlatopolsky, Maxim Brancheau, Daniel Zughaib, Marcel |
author_sort | Zlatopolsky, Maxim |
collection | PubMed |
description | The use of D-dimer assay to screen for aortic dissection has become routine in clinical practice. Although an uncommon disease entity, aortic dissection is rapidly fatal without prompt diagnosis, and biochemical detection in the proper clinical context is crucial. We performed a retrospective chart review of all aortic dissections presenting to a community tertiary care center between 2000 and 2016 and identified three patients in whom laboratory D-dimer testing was positive and a diagnosis of Stanford Type A aortic dissection was confirmed with computed tomography angiography based on clinical assessment and a newly validated risk stratification tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5952278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59522782018-05-18 At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection Zlatopolsky, Maxim Brancheau, Daniel Zughaib, Marcel SAGE Open Med Case Rep Case Report The use of D-dimer assay to screen for aortic dissection has become routine in clinical practice. Although an uncommon disease entity, aortic dissection is rapidly fatal without prompt diagnosis, and biochemical detection in the proper clinical context is crucial. We performed a retrospective chart review of all aortic dissections presenting to a community tertiary care center between 2000 and 2016 and identified three patients in whom laboratory D-dimer testing was positive and a diagnosis of Stanford Type A aortic dissection was confirmed with computed tomography angiography based on clinical assessment and a newly validated risk stratification tool. SAGE Publications 2018-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5952278/ /pubmed/29780589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050313X18774639 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Zlatopolsky, Maxim Brancheau, Daniel Zughaib, Marcel At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection |
title | At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection |
title_full | At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection |
title_fullStr | At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection |
title_full_unstemmed | At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection |
title_short | At the “threshold” of certainty: Risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection |
title_sort | at the “threshold” of certainty: risk stratification and clinical assessment incongruity in the diagnosis of aortic dissection |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29780589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050313X18774639 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zlatopolskymaxim atthethresholdofcertaintyriskstratificationandclinicalassessmentincongruityinthediagnosisofaorticdissection AT brancheaudaniel atthethresholdofcertaintyriskstratificationandclinicalassessmentincongruityinthediagnosisofaorticdissection AT zughaibmarcel atthethresholdofcertaintyriskstratificationandclinicalassessmentincongruityinthediagnosisofaorticdissection |