Cargando…
Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market
Cerivastatin was recently withdrawn from the market because of 52 deaths attributed to drug-related rhabdomyolysis that lead to kidney failure. The risk was found to be higher among patients who received the full dose (0.8 mg/day) and those who received gemfibrozil concomitantly. Rhabdomyolysis was...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2001
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-5-205 |
_version_ | 1782120064446627840 |
---|---|
author | Furberg, Curt D Pitt, Bertram |
author_facet | Furberg, Curt D Pitt, Bertram |
author_sort | Furberg, Curt D |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cerivastatin was recently withdrawn from the market because of 52 deaths attributed to drug-related rhabdomyolysis that lead to kidney failure. The risk was found to be higher among patients who received the full dose (0.8 mg/day) and those who received gemfibrozil concomitantly. Rhabdomyolysis was 10 times more common with cerivastatin than the other five approved statins. We address three important questions raised by this withdrawal. Should we continue to approve drugs on surrogate efficacy? Are all statins interchangeable? Do the benefits outweigh the risks of statins? We conclude that decisions regarding the use of drugs should be based on direct evidence from long-term clinical outcome trials. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-59524 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2001 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-595242001-11-06 Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market Furberg, Curt D Pitt, Bertram Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary Cerivastatin was recently withdrawn from the market because of 52 deaths attributed to drug-related rhabdomyolysis that lead to kidney failure. The risk was found to be higher among patients who received the full dose (0.8 mg/day) and those who received gemfibrozil concomitantly. Rhabdomyolysis was 10 times more common with cerivastatin than the other five approved statins. We address three important questions raised by this withdrawal. Should we continue to approve drugs on surrogate efficacy? Are all statins interchangeable? Do the benefits outweigh the risks of statins? We conclude that decisions regarding the use of drugs should be based on direct evidence from long-term clinical outcome trials. BioMed Central 2001 2001-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC59524/ /pubmed/11806796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-5-205 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Furberg, Curt D Pitt, Bertram Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market |
title | Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market |
title_full | Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market |
title_fullStr | Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market |
title_full_unstemmed | Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market |
title_short | Withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market |
title_sort | withdrawal of cerivastatin from the world market |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC59524/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806796 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-5-205 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT furbergcurtd withdrawalofcerivastatinfromtheworldmarket AT pittbertram withdrawalofcerivastatinfromtheworldmarket |