Cargando…

Evaluation of target dose inhomogeneity in breast cancer treatment due to tissue elemental differences

BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo simulations were run to estimate the dose variations generated by thedifference arising from the chemical composition of the tissues. METHODS: CT datasets of five breast cancer patients were selected. Mammary gland was delineated as clinical target volume CTV, as well as CTV_...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fogliata, A., De Rose, F., Stravato, A., Reggiori, G., Tomatis, S., Scorsetti, M., Cozzi, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1022-1
_version_ 1783323199167004672
author Fogliata, A.
De Rose, F.
Stravato, A.
Reggiori, G.
Tomatis, S.
Scorsetti, M.
Cozzi, L.
author_facet Fogliata, A.
De Rose, F.
Stravato, A.
Reggiori, G.
Tomatis, S.
Scorsetti, M.
Cozzi, L.
author_sort Fogliata, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo simulations were run to estimate the dose variations generated by thedifference arising from the chemical composition of the tissues. METHODS: CT datasets of five breast cancer patients were selected. Mammary gland was delineated as clinical target volume CTV, as well as CTV_lob and CTV_fat, being the lobular and fat fractions of the entire mammary gland. Patients were planned for volumetric modulated arc therapy technique, optimized in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. CT, structures and plans were imported in PRIMO, based on Monte Carlo code Penelope, to run three simulations: AdiMus, where the adipose and muscle tissues were automatically assigned to fat and lobular fractions of the breast; Adi and Mus, where adipose and muscle, respectively were assigned to the whole mammary gland. The specific tissue density was kept identical from the CT dataset. Differences in mean doses in the CTV_lob and CTV_fat structures were evaluated for the different tissue assignments. Differences generated by the tissue composition and estimated by Acuros dose calculations in Eclipse were also analysed. RESULTS: From Monte Carlo simulations, the dose in the lobular fraction of the breast, when adipose tissue is assigned in place of muscle, is overestimated by 1.25 ± 0.45%; the dose in the fat fraction of the breast with muscle tissue assignment is underestimated by 1.14 ± 0.51%. Acuros showed an overestimation of 0.98 ± 0.06% and an underestimation of 0.21 ± 0.14% in the lobular and fat portions, respectively. Reason of this dissimilarity resides in the fact that the two calculations, Monte Carlo and Acuros, differently manage the range of CT numbers and the material assignments, having Acuros an overlapping range, where two tissues are both present in defined proportions. CONCLUSION: Although not clinically significant, the dose deposition difference in the lobular and connective fat fraction of the breast tissue lead to an improved knowledge of the possible dose distribution and homogeneity in the breast radiation treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59525062018-05-21 Evaluation of target dose inhomogeneity in breast cancer treatment due to tissue elemental differences Fogliata, A. De Rose, F. Stravato, A. Reggiori, G. Tomatis, S. Scorsetti, M. Cozzi, L. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Monte Carlo simulations were run to estimate the dose variations generated by thedifference arising from the chemical composition of the tissues. METHODS: CT datasets of five breast cancer patients were selected. Mammary gland was delineated as clinical target volume CTV, as well as CTV_lob and CTV_fat, being the lobular and fat fractions of the entire mammary gland. Patients were planned for volumetric modulated arc therapy technique, optimized in the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. CT, structures and plans were imported in PRIMO, based on Monte Carlo code Penelope, to run three simulations: AdiMus, where the adipose and muscle tissues were automatically assigned to fat and lobular fractions of the breast; Adi and Mus, where adipose and muscle, respectively were assigned to the whole mammary gland. The specific tissue density was kept identical from the CT dataset. Differences in mean doses in the CTV_lob and CTV_fat structures were evaluated for the different tissue assignments. Differences generated by the tissue composition and estimated by Acuros dose calculations in Eclipse were also analysed. RESULTS: From Monte Carlo simulations, the dose in the lobular fraction of the breast, when adipose tissue is assigned in place of muscle, is overestimated by 1.25 ± 0.45%; the dose in the fat fraction of the breast with muscle tissue assignment is underestimated by 1.14 ± 0.51%. Acuros showed an overestimation of 0.98 ± 0.06% and an underestimation of 0.21 ± 0.14% in the lobular and fat portions, respectively. Reason of this dissimilarity resides in the fact that the two calculations, Monte Carlo and Acuros, differently manage the range of CT numbers and the material assignments, having Acuros an overlapping range, where two tissues are both present in defined proportions. CONCLUSION: Although not clinically significant, the dose deposition difference in the lobular and connective fat fraction of the breast tissue lead to an improved knowledge of the possible dose distribution and homogeneity in the breast radiation treatment. BioMed Central 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5952506/ /pubmed/29764450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1022-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Fogliata, A.
De Rose, F.
Stravato, A.
Reggiori, G.
Tomatis, S.
Scorsetti, M.
Cozzi, L.
Evaluation of target dose inhomogeneity in breast cancer treatment due to tissue elemental differences
title Evaluation of target dose inhomogeneity in breast cancer treatment due to tissue elemental differences
title_full Evaluation of target dose inhomogeneity in breast cancer treatment due to tissue elemental differences
title_fullStr Evaluation of target dose inhomogeneity in breast cancer treatment due to tissue elemental differences
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of target dose inhomogeneity in breast cancer treatment due to tissue elemental differences
title_short Evaluation of target dose inhomogeneity in breast cancer treatment due to tissue elemental differences
title_sort evaluation of target dose inhomogeneity in breast cancer treatment due to tissue elemental differences
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1022-1
work_keys_str_mv AT fogliataa evaluationoftargetdoseinhomogeneityinbreastcancertreatmentduetotissueelementaldifferences
AT derosef evaluationoftargetdoseinhomogeneityinbreastcancertreatmentduetotissueelementaldifferences
AT stravatoa evaluationoftargetdoseinhomogeneityinbreastcancertreatmentduetotissueelementaldifferences
AT reggiorig evaluationoftargetdoseinhomogeneityinbreastcancertreatmentduetotissueelementaldifferences
AT tomatiss evaluationoftargetdoseinhomogeneityinbreastcancertreatmentduetotissueelementaldifferences
AT scorsettim evaluationoftargetdoseinhomogeneityinbreastcancertreatmentduetotissueelementaldifferences
AT cozzil evaluationoftargetdoseinhomogeneityinbreastcancertreatmentduetotissueelementaldifferences