Cargando…

Telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective therapeutic intervention for people with chronic respiratory disease. However, fewer than 5% of eligible individuals receive pulmonary rehabilitation on an annual basis, largely due to limited availability of services and difficulties associated w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cox, Narelle S., McDonald, Christine F., Alison, Jennifer A., Mahal, Ajay, Wootton, Richard, Hill, Catherine J., Bondarenko, Janet, Macdonald, Heather, O’Halloran, Paul, Zanaboni, Paolo, Clarke, Ken, Rennick, Deidre, Borgelt, Kaye, Burge, Angela T., Lahham, Aroub, Wageck, Bruna, Crute, Hayley, Czupryn, Pawel, Nichols, Amanda, Holland, Anne E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0646-0
_version_ 1783323214909276160
author Cox, Narelle S.
McDonald, Christine F.
Alison, Jennifer A.
Mahal, Ajay
Wootton, Richard
Hill, Catherine J.
Bondarenko, Janet
Macdonald, Heather
O’Halloran, Paul
Zanaboni, Paolo
Clarke, Ken
Rennick, Deidre
Borgelt, Kaye
Burge, Angela T.
Lahham, Aroub
Wageck, Bruna
Crute, Hayley
Czupryn, Pawel
Nichols, Amanda
Holland, Anne E.
author_facet Cox, Narelle S.
McDonald, Christine F.
Alison, Jennifer A.
Mahal, Ajay
Wootton, Richard
Hill, Catherine J.
Bondarenko, Janet
Macdonald, Heather
O’Halloran, Paul
Zanaboni, Paolo
Clarke, Ken
Rennick, Deidre
Borgelt, Kaye
Burge, Angela T.
Lahham, Aroub
Wageck, Bruna
Crute, Hayley
Czupryn, Pawel
Nichols, Amanda
Holland, Anne E.
author_sort Cox, Narelle S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective therapeutic intervention for people with chronic respiratory disease. However, fewer than 5% of eligible individuals receive pulmonary rehabilitation on an annual basis, largely due to limited availability of services and difficulties associated with travel and transport. The Rehabilitation Exercise At Home (REAcH) study is an assessor-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled equivalence trial designed to compare the efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation and traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic respiratory disease. METHODS: Participants will undertake an 8-week group-based pulmonary rehabilitation program of twice-weekly supervised exercise training, either in-person at a centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation program or remotely from their home via the Internet. Supervised exercise training sessions will include 30 min of aerobic exercise (cycle and/or walking training). Individualised education and self-management training will be delivered. All participants will be prescribed a home exercise program of walking and strengthening activities. Outcomes will be assessed by a blinded assessor at baseline, after completion of the intervention, and 12-months post intervention. The primary outcome is change in dyspnea score as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire – dyspnea domain (CRQ-D). Secondary outcomes will evaluate the efficacy of telerehabilitation on 6-min walk distance, endurance cycle time during a constant work rate test, physical activity and quality of life. Adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation between the two models will be compared. A full economic analysis from a societal perspective will be undertaken to determine the cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation compared to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: Alternative models of pulmonary rehabilitation are required to improve both equity of access and patient-related outcomes. This trial will establish whether telerehabilitation can achieve equivalent improvement in outcomes compared to traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. If efficacious and cost-effective, the proposed telerehabilitation model is designed to be rapidly deployed into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register at (ACTRN12616000360415). Registered 21 March 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59525732018-05-21 Telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial Cox, Narelle S. McDonald, Christine F. Alison, Jennifer A. Mahal, Ajay Wootton, Richard Hill, Catherine J. Bondarenko, Janet Macdonald, Heather O’Halloran, Paul Zanaboni, Paolo Clarke, Ken Rennick, Deidre Borgelt, Kaye Burge, Angela T. Lahham, Aroub Wageck, Bruna Crute, Hayley Czupryn, Pawel Nichols, Amanda Holland, Anne E. BMC Pulm Med Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective therapeutic intervention for people with chronic respiratory disease. However, fewer than 5% of eligible individuals receive pulmonary rehabilitation on an annual basis, largely due to limited availability of services and difficulties associated with travel and transport. The Rehabilitation Exercise At Home (REAcH) study is an assessor-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled equivalence trial designed to compare the efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation and traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation in people with chronic respiratory disease. METHODS: Participants will undertake an 8-week group-based pulmonary rehabilitation program of twice-weekly supervised exercise training, either in-person at a centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation program or remotely from their home via the Internet. Supervised exercise training sessions will include 30 min of aerobic exercise (cycle and/or walking training). Individualised education and self-management training will be delivered. All participants will be prescribed a home exercise program of walking and strengthening activities. Outcomes will be assessed by a blinded assessor at baseline, after completion of the intervention, and 12-months post intervention. The primary outcome is change in dyspnea score as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire – dyspnea domain (CRQ-D). Secondary outcomes will evaluate the efficacy of telerehabilitation on 6-min walk distance, endurance cycle time during a constant work rate test, physical activity and quality of life. Adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation between the two models will be compared. A full economic analysis from a societal perspective will be undertaken to determine the cost-effectiveness of telerehabilitation compared to centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. DISCUSSION: Alternative models of pulmonary rehabilitation are required to improve both equity of access and patient-related outcomes. This trial will establish whether telerehabilitation can achieve equivalent improvement in outcomes compared to traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation. If efficacious and cost-effective, the proposed telerehabilitation model is designed to be rapidly deployed into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register at (ACTRN12616000360415). Registered 21 March 2016. BioMed Central 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5952573/ /pubmed/29764393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0646-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cox, Narelle S.
McDonald, Christine F.
Alison, Jennifer A.
Mahal, Ajay
Wootton, Richard
Hill, Catherine J.
Bondarenko, Janet
Macdonald, Heather
O’Halloran, Paul
Zanaboni, Paolo
Clarke, Ken
Rennick, Deidre
Borgelt, Kaye
Burge, Angela T.
Lahham, Aroub
Wageck, Bruna
Crute, Hayley
Czupryn, Pawel
Nichols, Amanda
Holland, Anne E.
Telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort telerehabilitation versus traditional centre-based pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic respiratory disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0646-0
work_keys_str_mv AT coxnarelles telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcdonaldchristinef telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alisonjennifera telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mahalajay telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT woottonrichard telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hillcatherinej telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bondarenkojanet telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT macdonaldheather telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ohalloranpaul telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zanabonipaolo telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkeken telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rennickdeidre telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT borgeltkaye telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT burgeangelat telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lahhamaroub telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wageckbruna telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT crutehayley telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT czuprynpawel telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nicholsamanda telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hollandannee telerehabilitationversustraditionalcentrebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationforpeoplewithchronicrespiratorydiseaseprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial