Cargando…

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index

BACKGROUND: There are various instruments and methods to evaluate spinal health and functional status. Whole-spine patient reported outcome (PRO) measures, such as the Spine Functional Index (SFI), assess the spine from the cervical to lumbo-sacral sections as a single kinetic chain. The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mokhtarinia, Hamid Reza, Hosseini, Azadeh, Maleki-Ghahfarokhi, Azam, Gabel, Charles Philip, Zohrabi, Majid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0928-5
_version_ 1783323220540129280
author Mokhtarinia, Hamid Reza
Hosseini, Azadeh
Maleki-Ghahfarokhi, Azam
Gabel, Charles Philip
Zohrabi, Majid
author_facet Mokhtarinia, Hamid Reza
Hosseini, Azadeh
Maleki-Ghahfarokhi, Azam
Gabel, Charles Philip
Zohrabi, Majid
author_sort Mokhtarinia, Hamid Reza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are various instruments and methods to evaluate spinal health and functional status. Whole-spine patient reported outcome (PRO) measures, such as the Spine Functional Index (SFI), assess the spine from the cervical to lumbo-sacral sections as a single kinetic chain. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the SFI for Persian speaking patients (SFI-Pr) and determine the psychometric properties of reliability and validity (convergent and construct) in a Persian patient population. METHODS: The SFI (English) PRO was translated into Persian according to published guidelines. Consecutive symptomatic spine patients (104 female and 120 male aged between 18 and 60) were recruited from three Iranian physiotherapy centers. Test-retest reliability was performed in a sub-sample (n = 31) at baseline and repeated between days 3–7. Convergent validity was determined by calculating the Pearson’s r correlation coefficient between the SFI-Pr and the Persian Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) for back pain patients and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for neck patients. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s α. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) used Maximum Likelihood Extraction followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). RESULTS: High levels of internal consistency (α = 0.81, item range = 0.78–0.82) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.96, item range = 0.83–0.98) were obtained. Convergent validity was very good between the SFI and RMQ (r = 0.69) and good between the SFI and NDI (r = 0.57). The EFA from the perspective of parsimony suggests a one-factor solution that explained 26.5% of total variance. The CFA was inconclusive of the one factor structure as the sample size was inadequate. There were no floor or ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The SFI-Pr PRO can be applied as a specific whole-spine status assessment instrument for clinical and research studies in Persian language populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59525972018-05-21 Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index Mokhtarinia, Hamid Reza Hosseini, Azadeh Maleki-Ghahfarokhi, Azam Gabel, Charles Philip Zohrabi, Majid Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: There are various instruments and methods to evaluate spinal health and functional status. Whole-spine patient reported outcome (PRO) measures, such as the Spine Functional Index (SFI), assess the spine from the cervical to lumbo-sacral sections as a single kinetic chain. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the SFI for Persian speaking patients (SFI-Pr) and determine the psychometric properties of reliability and validity (convergent and construct) in a Persian patient population. METHODS: The SFI (English) PRO was translated into Persian according to published guidelines. Consecutive symptomatic spine patients (104 female and 120 male aged between 18 and 60) were recruited from three Iranian physiotherapy centers. Test-retest reliability was performed in a sub-sample (n = 31) at baseline and repeated between days 3–7. Convergent validity was determined by calculating the Pearson’s r correlation coefficient between the SFI-Pr and the Persian Roland Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) for back pain patients and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) for neck patients. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s α. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) used Maximum Likelihood Extraction followed by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). RESULTS: High levels of internal consistency (α = 0.81, item range = 0.78–0.82) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.96, item range = 0.83–0.98) were obtained. Convergent validity was very good between the SFI and RMQ (r = 0.69) and good between the SFI and NDI (r = 0.57). The EFA from the perspective of parsimony suggests a one-factor solution that explained 26.5% of total variance. The CFA was inconclusive of the one factor structure as the sample size was inadequate. There were no floor or ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The SFI-Pr PRO can be applied as a specific whole-spine status assessment instrument for clinical and research studies in Persian language populations. BioMed Central 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5952597/ /pubmed/29764442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0928-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mokhtarinia, Hamid Reza
Hosseini, Azadeh
Maleki-Ghahfarokhi, Azam
Gabel, Charles Philip
Zohrabi, Majid
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index
title Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index
title_full Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index
title_fullStr Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index
title_short Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Persian version of the spine functional index
title_sort cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the persian version of the spine functional index
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764442
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0928-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mokhtariniahamidreza crossculturaladaptationvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthespinefunctionalindex
AT hosseiniazadeh crossculturaladaptationvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthespinefunctionalindex
AT malekighahfarokhiazam crossculturaladaptationvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthespinefunctionalindex
AT gabelcharlesphilip crossculturaladaptationvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthespinefunctionalindex
AT zohrabimajid crossculturaladaptationvalidityandreliabilityofthepersianversionofthespinefunctionalindex