Cargando…

Discontinuation of the PACE Plus trial: problems in patient recruitment in general practice

BACKGROUND: The PACE Plus trial was a multi-center, double-blinded, superiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in patients from Dutch general practice to investigate the efficacy of paracetamol and NSAIDs in acute non-specific low back pain (LBP). Because insufficient numbers of patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreijenberg, M., Luijsterburg, P. A. J., Van Trier, Y. D. M., Rizopoulos, D., Koopmanschap, M. A., Voogt, L., Maher, C. G., Koes, B. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29759063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2063-1
_version_ 1783323229391159296
author Schreijenberg, M.
Luijsterburg, P. A. J.
Van Trier, Y. D. M.
Rizopoulos, D.
Koopmanschap, M. A.
Voogt, L.
Maher, C. G.
Koes, B. W.
author_facet Schreijenberg, M.
Luijsterburg, P. A. J.
Van Trier, Y. D. M.
Rizopoulos, D.
Koopmanschap, M. A.
Voogt, L.
Maher, C. G.
Koes, B. W.
author_sort Schreijenberg, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The PACE Plus trial was a multi-center, double-blinded, superiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in patients from Dutch general practice to investigate the efficacy of paracetamol and NSAIDs in acute non-specific low back pain (LBP). Because insufficient numbers of patients could be recruited (only four out of the required 800 patients could be recruited over a period of 6 months), the trial was prematurely terminated in February 2017, 6 months after the start of recruitment. This article aims to transparently communicate the discontinuation of PACE Plus and to make recommendations for future studies. METHODS: General Practitioners (GPs) from 36 participating practices received a one-question survey in which they were asked to give the three most important factors that in their opinion contributed to failure of patient recruitment. RESULTS: GPs of 33 out of 36 (92%) participating practices sent a response. A total of 81 factors were reported. These have been categorized into patient factors (26 out of 81 comments, 32%), GP factors (39 out of 81 comments, 48%) and research factors (16 out of 81 comments, 20%). DISCUSSION: Patient recruitment in the PACE Plus trial may have failed due to inefficient medication distribution, recruitment of incident rather than prevalent cases, a design that was too complicated, adequate self-management of LBP, patient expectations different from the trial’s scope and lack of time of participating GPs. Substantial differences in design may explain why the preceding PACE trial did manage to successfully complete patient recruitment. CONCLUSION: Although the PACE Plus trial was terminated as a result of insufficient patient inclusion, the research questions addressed in this trial remain relevant but unanswered. We hope that lessons learned from the discontinuation of PACE Plus and corresponding recommendations may be helpful in the design of upcoming research projects in LBP in general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Registration NTR6089, registered September 14th 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59526472018-05-21 Discontinuation of the PACE Plus trial: problems in patient recruitment in general practice Schreijenberg, M. Luijsterburg, P. A. J. Van Trier, Y. D. M. Rizopoulos, D. Koopmanschap, M. A. Voogt, L. Maher, C. G. Koes, B. W. BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The PACE Plus trial was a multi-center, double-blinded, superiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted in patients from Dutch general practice to investigate the efficacy of paracetamol and NSAIDs in acute non-specific low back pain (LBP). Because insufficient numbers of patients could be recruited (only four out of the required 800 patients could be recruited over a period of 6 months), the trial was prematurely terminated in February 2017, 6 months after the start of recruitment. This article aims to transparently communicate the discontinuation of PACE Plus and to make recommendations for future studies. METHODS: General Practitioners (GPs) from 36 participating practices received a one-question survey in which they were asked to give the three most important factors that in their opinion contributed to failure of patient recruitment. RESULTS: GPs of 33 out of 36 (92%) participating practices sent a response. A total of 81 factors were reported. These have been categorized into patient factors (26 out of 81 comments, 32%), GP factors (39 out of 81 comments, 48%) and research factors (16 out of 81 comments, 20%). DISCUSSION: Patient recruitment in the PACE Plus trial may have failed due to inefficient medication distribution, recruitment of incident rather than prevalent cases, a design that was too complicated, adequate self-management of LBP, patient expectations different from the trial’s scope and lack of time of participating GPs. Substantial differences in design may explain why the preceding PACE trial did manage to successfully complete patient recruitment. CONCLUSION: Although the PACE Plus trial was terminated as a result of insufficient patient inclusion, the research questions addressed in this trial remain relevant but unanswered. We hope that lessons learned from the discontinuation of PACE Plus and corresponding recommendations may be helpful in the design of upcoming research projects in LBP in general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Registration NTR6089, registered September 14th 2016. BioMed Central 2018-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5952647/ /pubmed/29759063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2063-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schreijenberg, M.
Luijsterburg, P. A. J.
Van Trier, Y. D. M.
Rizopoulos, D.
Koopmanschap, M. A.
Voogt, L.
Maher, C. G.
Koes, B. W.
Discontinuation of the PACE Plus trial: problems in patient recruitment in general practice
title Discontinuation of the PACE Plus trial: problems in patient recruitment in general practice
title_full Discontinuation of the PACE Plus trial: problems in patient recruitment in general practice
title_fullStr Discontinuation of the PACE Plus trial: problems in patient recruitment in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Discontinuation of the PACE Plus trial: problems in patient recruitment in general practice
title_short Discontinuation of the PACE Plus trial: problems in patient recruitment in general practice
title_sort discontinuation of the pace plus trial: problems in patient recruitment in general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29759063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2063-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schreijenbergm discontinuationofthepaceplustrialproblemsinpatientrecruitmentingeneralpractice
AT luijsterburgpaj discontinuationofthepaceplustrialproblemsinpatientrecruitmentingeneralpractice
AT vantrierydm discontinuationofthepaceplustrialproblemsinpatientrecruitmentingeneralpractice
AT rizopoulosd discontinuationofthepaceplustrialproblemsinpatientrecruitmentingeneralpractice
AT koopmanschapma discontinuationofthepaceplustrialproblemsinpatientrecruitmentingeneralpractice
AT voogtl discontinuationofthepaceplustrialproblemsinpatientrecruitmentingeneralpractice
AT mahercg discontinuationofthepaceplustrialproblemsinpatientrecruitmentingeneralpractice
AT koesbw discontinuationofthepaceplustrialproblemsinpatientrecruitmentingeneralpractice