Cargando…
How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()
Anonymous gamete donation continues to be practised in most jurisdictions around the world, but this practice has come under increased scrutiny. Thus, several countries now mandate that donors be identifiable to their genetic offspring. Critics contend that anonymous gamete donation harms the intere...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29774255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.003 |
_version_ | 1783323237188370432 |
---|---|
author | de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada |
author_facet | de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada |
author_sort | de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anonymous gamete donation continues to be practised in most jurisdictions around the world, but this practice has come under increased scrutiny. Thus, several countries now mandate that donors be identifiable to their genetic offspring. Critics contend that anonymous gamete donation harms the interests of donor-conceived individuals and that protection of these interests calls for legal prohibition of anonymous donations. Among the vital interests that critics claim are thwarted by anonymous donation are an interest in having a strong family relationship, health interests, and an interest in forming a healthy identity. This article discusses each of these interests and examines what they could involve. The legislation in two countries is considered: Spain, which mandates anonymous gamete donation, and the UK, which prohibits such practice, to assess how these different legislations might or might not protect these vital interests. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5952682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59526822018-05-17 How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?() de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada Reprod Biomed Soc Online Brocher Symposium: Between Policy and Practice - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equitable Access to Healthcare Anonymous gamete donation continues to be practised in most jurisdictions around the world, but this practice has come under increased scrutiny. Thus, several countries now mandate that donors be identifiable to their genetic offspring. Critics contend that anonymous gamete donation harms the interests of donor-conceived individuals and that protection of these interests calls for legal prohibition of anonymous donations. Among the vital interests that critics claim are thwarted by anonymous donation are an interest in having a strong family relationship, health interests, and an interest in forming a healthy identity. This article discusses each of these interests and examines what they could involve. The legislation in two countries is considered: Spain, which mandates anonymous gamete donation, and the UK, which prohibits such practice, to assess how these different legislations might or might not protect these vital interests. Elsevier 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5952682/ /pubmed/29774255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.003 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brocher Symposium: Between Policy and Practice - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equitable Access to Healthcare de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?() |
title | How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?() |
title_full | How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?() |
title_fullStr | How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?() |
title_full_unstemmed | How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?() |
title_short | How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?() |
title_sort | how best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?() |
topic | Brocher Symposium: Between Policy and Practice - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equitable Access to Healthcare |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29774255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demelomartininmaculada howbesttoprotectthevitalinterestsofdonorconceivedindividualsprohibitingormandatinganonymityingametedonations |