Cargando…

How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()

Anonymous gamete donation continues to be practised in most jurisdictions around the world, but this practice has come under increased scrutiny. Thus, several countries now mandate that donors be identifiable to their genetic offspring. Critics contend that anonymous gamete donation harms the intere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29774255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.003
_version_ 1783323237188370432
author de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada
author_facet de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada
author_sort de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada
collection PubMed
description Anonymous gamete donation continues to be practised in most jurisdictions around the world, but this practice has come under increased scrutiny. Thus, several countries now mandate that donors be identifiable to their genetic offspring. Critics contend that anonymous gamete donation harms the interests of donor-conceived individuals and that protection of these interests calls for legal prohibition of anonymous donations. Among the vital interests that critics claim are thwarted by anonymous donation are an interest in having a strong family relationship, health interests, and an interest in forming a healthy identity. This article discusses each of these interests and examines what they could involve. The legislation in two countries is considered: Spain, which mandates anonymous gamete donation, and the UK, which prohibits such practice, to assess how these different legislations might or might not protect these vital interests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59526822018-05-17 How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?() de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada Reprod Biomed Soc Online Brocher Symposium: Between Policy and Practice - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equitable Access to Healthcare Anonymous gamete donation continues to be practised in most jurisdictions around the world, but this practice has come under increased scrutiny. Thus, several countries now mandate that donors be identifiable to their genetic offspring. Critics contend that anonymous gamete donation harms the interests of donor-conceived individuals and that protection of these interests calls for legal prohibition of anonymous donations. Among the vital interests that critics claim are thwarted by anonymous donation are an interest in having a strong family relationship, health interests, and an interest in forming a healthy identity. This article discusses each of these interests and examines what they could involve. The legislation in two countries is considered: Spain, which mandates anonymous gamete donation, and the UK, which prohibits such practice, to assess how these different legislations might or might not protect these vital interests. Elsevier 2017-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5952682/ /pubmed/29774255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.003 Text en © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brocher Symposium: Between Policy and Practice - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equitable Access to Healthcare
de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada
How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()
title How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()
title_full How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()
title_fullStr How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()
title_full_unstemmed How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()
title_short How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()
title_sort how best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?()
topic Brocher Symposium: Between Policy and Practice - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equitable Access to Healthcare
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29774255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.003
work_keys_str_mv AT demelomartininmaculada howbesttoprotectthevitalinterestsofdonorconceivedindividualsprohibitingormandatinganonymityingametedonations