Cargando…

Changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in Austria()

From 1992 until 2015, Austria had a very restrictive Reproductive Medicine Law (FMedG, 1992) that prohibited a number of treatments such as egg donation, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), heterologous sperm donation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as well as general access to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griessler, Erich, Hager, Mariella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29774252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.12.005
_version_ 1783323262740070400
author Griessler, Erich
Hager, Mariella
author_facet Griessler, Erich
Hager, Mariella
author_sort Griessler, Erich
collection PubMed
description From 1992 until 2015, Austria had a very restrictive Reproductive Medicine Law (FMedG, 1992) that prohibited a number of treatments such as egg donation, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), heterologous sperm donation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as well as general access to assisted reproductive technology for same-sex couples. As one consequence of this rather prohibitive law, Austrian physicians active in the area of assisted reproductive technology co-operated with, or had daughter institutes in, countries with less restrictive legislation such as the Czech Republic and Slovakia, which are only a few hours’ drive away. For a long time, liberalisation of the Reproductive Medicine Law was blocked by the fierce and seemingly unresolvable struggle between the restrictive conservative party (ÖVP) and the permissive social democrats’ party (SPÖ). In 2014 the impasse, which had lasted for decades, was finally resolved in favour of a more liberal Reproductive Medicine Law that permits egg donation, PGD in some cases and heterologous sperm donation for IVF/ICSI and lesbian couples. Assisted reproductive technology treatments for single women and surrogate motherhood remain prohibited. The new Reproductive Medicine Law was heavily opposed by the Catholic Church, by some conservatives and by disability associations. By applying the concept of political culture, this paper explains why a liberalisation of the Reproductive Medicine Law was blocked for decades, and how the sudden policy change came about.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59528102018-05-17 Changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in Austria() Griessler, Erich Hager, Mariella Reprod Biomed Soc Online Brocher Symposium: Between Policy and Practice - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equitable Access to Healthcare From 1992 until 2015, Austria had a very restrictive Reproductive Medicine Law (FMedG, 1992) that prohibited a number of treatments such as egg donation, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), heterologous sperm donation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) as well as general access to assisted reproductive technology for same-sex couples. As one consequence of this rather prohibitive law, Austrian physicians active in the area of assisted reproductive technology co-operated with, or had daughter institutes in, countries with less restrictive legislation such as the Czech Republic and Slovakia, which are only a few hours’ drive away. For a long time, liberalisation of the Reproductive Medicine Law was blocked by the fierce and seemingly unresolvable struggle between the restrictive conservative party (ÖVP) and the permissive social democrats’ party (SPÖ). In 2014 the impasse, which had lasted for decades, was finally resolved in favour of a more liberal Reproductive Medicine Law that permits egg donation, PGD in some cases and heterologous sperm donation for IVF/ICSI and lesbian couples. Assisted reproductive technology treatments for single women and surrogate motherhood remain prohibited. The new Reproductive Medicine Law was heavily opposed by the Catholic Church, by some conservatives and by disability associations. By applying the concept of political culture, this paper explains why a liberalisation of the Reproductive Medicine Law was blocked for decades, and how the sudden policy change came about. Elsevier 2017-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5952810/ /pubmed/29774252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.12.005 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brocher Symposium: Between Policy and Practice - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equitable Access to Healthcare
Griessler, Erich
Hager, Mariella
Changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in Austria()
title Changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in Austria()
title_full Changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in Austria()
title_fullStr Changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in Austria()
title_full_unstemmed Changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in Austria()
title_short Changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in Austria()
title_sort changing direction: the struggle of regulating assisted reproductive technology in austria()
topic Brocher Symposium: Between Policy and Practice - Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Equitable Access to Healthcare
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29774252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.12.005
work_keys_str_mv AT griesslererich changingdirectionthestruggleofregulatingassistedreproductivetechnologyinaustria
AT hagermariella changingdirectionthestruggleofregulatingassistedreproductivetechnologyinaustria