Cargando…

Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis

BACKGROUND: Despite the known benefits of continuous support during childbirth, the practice is still not routinely implemented in all maternity settings and women’s views and experiences might not be considered. The purpose of the study was to integrate individual studies’ findings related to women...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lunda, Petronellah, Minnie, Catharina Susanna, Benadé, Petronella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1755-8
_version_ 1783323273366339584
author Lunda, Petronellah
Minnie, Catharina Susanna
Benadé, Petronella
author_facet Lunda, Petronellah
Minnie, Catharina Susanna
Benadé, Petronella
author_sort Lunda, Petronellah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the known benefits of continuous support during childbirth, the practice is still not routinely implemented in all maternity settings and women’s views and experiences might not be considered. The purpose of the study was to integrate individual studies’ findings related to women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth in order to expand the understanding of the phenomenon. The review question was: What were the views and experiences of women regarding continuous support during childbirth as reported in studies that adopted qualitative or mixed research methods (with a qualitative component) using semi-structured, in-depth or focus group interviews or case studies? METHODS: A detailed search was executed on electronic data bases: EBSCOhost: Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SocINDEX, OAlster, Scopus, SciELO, Science Direct, PubMED and Google Scholar, using a predetermined search strategy. Reference lists of included studies were analysed to identify possible studies that were missing from electronic data bases. Pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied during the selection of eligible sources. After critical appraisal, a total of 12 studies were included for data-extraction and meta-synthesis. RESULTS: Two themes were identified, namely the roles and attributes of the support persons and the type of support provided. Women’s perceptions about continuous support during childbirth were influenced by the characteristics and attributes of the support person as well as the types of supportive care rendered. Women preferred someone with whom they were familiar and comfortable. CONCLUSION: Continuous support during childbirth was valued by most women. Their perceptions were influenced by the type of support person: a health professional or a lay support person. Health care institutions should include continuous support during childbirth in their policies and guidelines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1755-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59528572018-05-21 Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis Lunda, Petronellah Minnie, Catharina Susanna Benadé, Petronella BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite the known benefits of continuous support during childbirth, the practice is still not routinely implemented in all maternity settings and women’s views and experiences might not be considered. The purpose of the study was to integrate individual studies’ findings related to women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth in order to expand the understanding of the phenomenon. The review question was: What were the views and experiences of women regarding continuous support during childbirth as reported in studies that adopted qualitative or mixed research methods (with a qualitative component) using semi-structured, in-depth or focus group interviews or case studies? METHODS: A detailed search was executed on electronic data bases: EBSCOhost: Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SocINDEX, OAlster, Scopus, SciELO, Science Direct, PubMED and Google Scholar, using a predetermined search strategy. Reference lists of included studies were analysed to identify possible studies that were missing from electronic data bases. Pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied during the selection of eligible sources. After critical appraisal, a total of 12 studies were included for data-extraction and meta-synthesis. RESULTS: Two themes were identified, namely the roles and attributes of the support persons and the type of support provided. Women’s perceptions about continuous support during childbirth were influenced by the characteristics and attributes of the support person as well as the types of supportive care rendered. Women preferred someone with whom they were familiar and comfortable. CONCLUSION: Continuous support during childbirth was valued by most women. Their perceptions were influenced by the type of support person: a health professional or a lay support person. Health care institutions should include continuous support during childbirth in their policies and guidelines. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-018-1755-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5952857/ /pubmed/29764406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1755-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lunda, Petronellah
Minnie, Catharina Susanna
Benadé, Petronella
Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis
title Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis
title_full Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis
title_fullStr Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis
title_short Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis
title_sort women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764406
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1755-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lundapetronellah womensexperiencesofcontinuoussupportduringchildbirthametasynthesis
AT minniecatharinasusanna womensexperiencesofcontinuoussupportduringchildbirthametasynthesis
AT benadepetronella womensexperiencesofcontinuoussupportduringchildbirthametasynthesis