Cargando…

Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease: Comparison of current classification systems

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) according to current classification systems by examining CSF from a representative general population sample of 70-year-olds from Gothenburg, Sweden. METHOD: The sample was derived from the population-based H70 Gothenburg B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kern, Silke, Zetterberg, Henrik, Kern, Jürgen, Zettergren, Anna, Waern, Margda, Höglund, Kina, Andreasson, Ulf, Wetterberg, Hanna, Börjesson-Hanson, Anne, Blennow, Kaj, Skoog, Ingmar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005476
_version_ 1783323292604563456
author Kern, Silke
Zetterberg, Henrik
Kern, Jürgen
Zettergren, Anna
Waern, Margda
Höglund, Kina
Andreasson, Ulf
Wetterberg, Hanna
Börjesson-Hanson, Anne
Blennow, Kaj
Skoog, Ingmar
author_facet Kern, Silke
Zetterberg, Henrik
Kern, Jürgen
Zettergren, Anna
Waern, Margda
Höglund, Kina
Andreasson, Ulf
Wetterberg, Hanna
Börjesson-Hanson, Anne
Blennow, Kaj
Skoog, Ingmar
author_sort Kern, Silke
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) according to current classification systems by examining CSF from a representative general population sample of 70-year-olds from Gothenburg, Sweden. METHOD: The sample was derived from the population-based H70 Gothenburg Birth Cohort Studies in Gothenburg, Sweden. The participants (n = 322, age 70 years) underwent comprehensive neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and somatic examinations. CSF levels of β-amyloid (Aβ)(42), Aβ(40), total tau, and phosphorylated tau were measured. Preclinical AD was classified according to criteria of the A/T/N system, Dubois 2016, National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria, and International Working Group-2 (IWG-2) criteria. Individuals with Clinical Dementia Rating score >0 were excluded, leaving 259 cognitively unimpaired individuals. RESULTS: The prevalence of amyloid pathology was 22.8%, of total tau pathology was 33.2%, and of phosphorylated tau pathology was 6.9%. With the A/T/N system, the prevalence of A+/T−/N− was 13.1%, A+/T−/N+ was 7.3%, A+/T+/N+ was 2.3%, A−/T−/N+ was 18.9%, and A−/T+/N+ was 4.6%. When the Dubois criteria were applied, the prevalence of asymptomatic at risk for AD was 36.7% and of preclinical AD was 9.7%. With the NIA-AA criteria, the prevalence of stage 1 was 13.1% and stage 2 was 9.7%. With the IWG-2 criteria, the prevalence of asymptomatic at risk for AD was 9.7%. The APOE ε4 allele was associated with several of the categories. Men more often had total tau pathology, A+/T−/N+, preclinical AD according to Dubois 2016, asymptomatic at risk for AD according to the IWG-2 criteria, and NIA-AA stage 2. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of pathologic AD markers was very common (46%) in a representative population sample of 70-year-olds. The clinical implications of these findings need to be scrutinized further in longitudinal studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59529692018-05-16 Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease: Comparison of current classification systems Kern, Silke Zetterberg, Henrik Kern, Jürgen Zettergren, Anna Waern, Margda Höglund, Kina Andreasson, Ulf Wetterberg, Hanna Börjesson-Hanson, Anne Blennow, Kaj Skoog, Ingmar Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) according to current classification systems by examining CSF from a representative general population sample of 70-year-olds from Gothenburg, Sweden. METHOD: The sample was derived from the population-based H70 Gothenburg Birth Cohort Studies in Gothenburg, Sweden. The participants (n = 322, age 70 years) underwent comprehensive neuropsychiatric, cognitive, and somatic examinations. CSF levels of β-amyloid (Aβ)(42), Aβ(40), total tau, and phosphorylated tau were measured. Preclinical AD was classified according to criteria of the A/T/N system, Dubois 2016, National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) criteria, and International Working Group-2 (IWG-2) criteria. Individuals with Clinical Dementia Rating score >0 were excluded, leaving 259 cognitively unimpaired individuals. RESULTS: The prevalence of amyloid pathology was 22.8%, of total tau pathology was 33.2%, and of phosphorylated tau pathology was 6.9%. With the A/T/N system, the prevalence of A+/T−/N− was 13.1%, A+/T−/N+ was 7.3%, A+/T+/N+ was 2.3%, A−/T−/N+ was 18.9%, and A−/T+/N+ was 4.6%. When the Dubois criteria were applied, the prevalence of asymptomatic at risk for AD was 36.7% and of preclinical AD was 9.7%. With the NIA-AA criteria, the prevalence of stage 1 was 13.1% and stage 2 was 9.7%. With the IWG-2 criteria, the prevalence of asymptomatic at risk for AD was 9.7%. The APOE ε4 allele was associated with several of the categories. Men more often had total tau pathology, A+/T−/N+, preclinical AD according to Dubois 2016, asymptomatic at risk for AD according to the IWG-2 criteria, and NIA-AA stage 2. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of pathologic AD markers was very common (46%) in a representative population sample of 70-year-olds. The clinical implications of these findings need to be scrutinized further in longitudinal studies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5952969/ /pubmed/29653987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005476 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Kern, Silke
Zetterberg, Henrik
Kern, Jürgen
Zettergren, Anna
Waern, Margda
Höglund, Kina
Andreasson, Ulf
Wetterberg, Hanna
Börjesson-Hanson, Anne
Blennow, Kaj
Skoog, Ingmar
Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease: Comparison of current classification systems
title Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease: Comparison of current classification systems
title_full Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease: Comparison of current classification systems
title_fullStr Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease: Comparison of current classification systems
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease: Comparison of current classification systems
title_short Prevalence of preclinical Alzheimer disease: Comparison of current classification systems
title_sort prevalence of preclinical alzheimer disease: comparison of current classification systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29653987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005476
work_keys_str_mv AT kernsilke prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT zetterberghenrik prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT kernjurgen prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT zettergrenanna prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT waernmargda prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT hoglundkina prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT andreassonulf prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT wetterberghanna prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT borjessonhansonanne prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT blennowkaj prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems
AT skoogingmar prevalenceofpreclinicalalzheimerdiseasecomparisonofcurrentclassificationsystems