Cargando…
Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
BACKGROUND: The validity of a cardiovascular risk self-screening method was assessed. The results obtained for self-measurement of blood pressure, a point-of-care system’s assessment of lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin, and a self-administered questionnaire (sex, age, diabetes, tobacco consumpt...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5953309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785141 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S158358 |
_version_ | 1783323336648949760 |
---|---|
author | Barroso, María Pérez-Fernández, Silvia Vila, M Mar Zomeño, M Dolors Martí-Lluch, Ruth Cordon, Ferran Ramos, Rafel Elosua, Roberto Degano, Irene R Fitó, Montse Cabezas, Carmen Salvador, Gemma Castell, Conxa Grau, María |
author_facet | Barroso, María Pérez-Fernández, Silvia Vila, M Mar Zomeño, M Dolors Martí-Lluch, Ruth Cordon, Ferran Ramos, Rafel Elosua, Roberto Degano, Irene R Fitó, Montse Cabezas, Carmen Salvador, Gemma Castell, Conxa Grau, María |
author_sort | Barroso, María |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The validity of a cardiovascular risk self-screening method was assessed. The results obtained for self-measurement of blood pressure, a point-of-care system’s assessment of lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin, and a self-administered questionnaire (sex, age, diabetes, tobacco consumption) were compared with the standard screening (gold standard) conducted by a health professional. METHODS: Crossover clinical trial on a population-based sample from Girona (north-eastern Spain), aged 35–74, with no cardiovascular disease at recruitment. Participants were randomized to one of the two risk assessment sequences (standard screening followed by self-screening or vice versa). Cardiovascular risk was estimated with the Framingham-REGICOR function. Concordance between methods was estimated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were estimated, considering 5% cardiovascular risk as the cutoff point. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration #NCT02373319. Clinical Research Ethic Committee of the Parc de Salut Mar Registration #2014/5815/I. RESULTS: The median cardiovascular risk in men was 2.56 (interquartile range: 1.42–4.35) estimated by standard methods and 2.25 (1.28–4.07) by self-screening with ICC=0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.93). In women, the cardiovascular risk was 1.14 (0.61–2.10) by standard methods and 1.10 (0.56–2.00) by self-screening, with ICC=0.89 (0.87–0.90). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the self-screening method were 0.74 (0.63–0.82), 0.97 (0.95–0.99), 0.86 (0.77–0.93), and 0.94 (0.91–0.96), respectively, in men. In women, these values were 0.50 (0.30–0.70), 0.99 (0.98–1), 0.81 (0.54–0.96), and 0.97 (0.95–0.99), respectively. CONCLUSION: The self-screening method for assessing cardiovascular risk provided similar results to the standard method. Self-screening had high clinical performance to rule out intermediate or high cardiovascular risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5953309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59533092018-05-21 Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk Barroso, María Pérez-Fernández, Silvia Vila, M Mar Zomeño, M Dolors Martí-Lluch, Ruth Cordon, Ferran Ramos, Rafel Elosua, Roberto Degano, Irene R Fitó, Montse Cabezas, Carmen Salvador, Gemma Castell, Conxa Grau, María Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: The validity of a cardiovascular risk self-screening method was assessed. The results obtained for self-measurement of blood pressure, a point-of-care system’s assessment of lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin, and a self-administered questionnaire (sex, age, diabetes, tobacco consumption) were compared with the standard screening (gold standard) conducted by a health professional. METHODS: Crossover clinical trial on a population-based sample from Girona (north-eastern Spain), aged 35–74, with no cardiovascular disease at recruitment. Participants were randomized to one of the two risk assessment sequences (standard screening followed by self-screening or vice versa). Cardiovascular risk was estimated with the Framingham-REGICOR function. Concordance between methods was estimated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were estimated, considering 5% cardiovascular risk as the cutoff point. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration #NCT02373319. Clinical Research Ethic Committee of the Parc de Salut Mar Registration #2014/5815/I. RESULTS: The median cardiovascular risk in men was 2.56 (interquartile range: 1.42–4.35) estimated by standard methods and 2.25 (1.28–4.07) by self-screening with ICC=0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.93). In women, the cardiovascular risk was 1.14 (0.61–2.10) by standard methods and 1.10 (0.56–2.00) by self-screening, with ICC=0.89 (0.87–0.90). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the self-screening method were 0.74 (0.63–0.82), 0.97 (0.95–0.99), 0.86 (0.77–0.93), and 0.94 (0.91–0.96), respectively, in men. In women, these values were 0.50 (0.30–0.70), 0.99 (0.98–1), 0.81 (0.54–0.96), and 0.97 (0.95–0.99), respectively. CONCLUSION: The self-screening method for assessing cardiovascular risk provided similar results to the standard method. Self-screening had high clinical performance to rule out intermediate or high cardiovascular risk. Dove Medical Press 2018-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5953309/ /pubmed/29785141 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S158358 Text en © 2018 Barroso et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Barroso, María Pérez-Fernández, Silvia Vila, M Mar Zomeño, M Dolors Martí-Lluch, Ruth Cordon, Ferran Ramos, Rafel Elosua, Roberto Degano, Irene R Fitó, Montse Cabezas, Carmen Salvador, Gemma Castell, Conxa Grau, María Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk |
title | Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk |
title_full | Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk |
title_fullStr | Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk |
title_short | Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk |
title_sort | validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5953309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29785141 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S158358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barrosomaria validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT perezfernandezsilvia validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT vilammar validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT zomenomdolors validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT martilluchruth validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT cordonferran validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT ramosrafel validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT elosuaroberto validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT deganoirener validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT fitomontse validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT cabezascarmen validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT salvadorgemma validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT castellconxa validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk AT graumaria validityofamethodfortheselfscreeningofcardiovascularrisk |