Cargando…
The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision?
Background: This article assesses the global health policies of the European Union (EU) and those of its individual member states. So far EU and public health scholars have paid little heed to this, despite the large budgets involved in this area. While the European Commission has attempted to defin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5953526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764107 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.112 |
_version_ | 1783323372704235520 |
---|---|
author | Steurs, Lies Van de Pas, Remco Delputte, Sarah Orbie, Jan |
author_facet | Steurs, Lies Van de Pas, Remco Delputte, Sarah Orbie, Jan |
author_sort | Steurs, Lies |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: This article assesses the global health policies of the European Union (EU) and those of its individual member states. So far EU and public health scholars have paid little heed to this, despite the large budgets involved in this area. While the European Commission has attempted to define the ‘EU role in Global Health’ in 2010, member states are active in the domain of global health as well. Therefore, this article raises the question to what extent a common ‘EU’ vision on global health exists. Methods: This is examined through a comparative framing analysis of the global health policy documents of the European Commission and five EU member states (France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Denmark). The analysis is informed by a two-layered typology, distinguishing global health from international health and four ‘global health frames,’ namely social justice, security, investment and charity. Results: The findings show that the concept of ‘global health’ has not gained ground the same way within European policy documents. Consequently, there are also differences in how health is being framed. While the European Commission, Belgium, and Denmark clearly support a social justice frame, the global health strategies of the United Kingdom, Germany, and France put an additional focus on the security and investment frames. Conclusion: There are different understandings of global/international health as well as different framings within relevant documents of the EU and its member states. Therefore, the existence of an ‘EU’ vision on global health is questionable. Further research is needed on how this impacts on policy implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5953526 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59535262018-05-18 The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision? Steurs, Lies Van de Pas, Remco Delputte, Sarah Orbie, Jan Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: This article assesses the global health policies of the European Union (EU) and those of its individual member states. So far EU and public health scholars have paid little heed to this, despite the large budgets involved in this area. While the European Commission has attempted to define the ‘EU role in Global Health’ in 2010, member states are active in the domain of global health as well. Therefore, this article raises the question to what extent a common ‘EU’ vision on global health exists. Methods: This is examined through a comparative framing analysis of the global health policy documents of the European Commission and five EU member states (France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium, and Denmark). The analysis is informed by a two-layered typology, distinguishing global health from international health and four ‘global health frames,’ namely social justice, security, investment and charity. Results: The findings show that the concept of ‘global health’ has not gained ground the same way within European policy documents. Consequently, there are also differences in how health is being framed. While the European Commission, Belgium, and Denmark clearly support a social justice frame, the global health strategies of the United Kingdom, Germany, and France put an additional focus on the security and investment frames. Conclusion: There are different understandings of global/international health as well as different framings within relevant documents of the EU and its member states. Therefore, the existence of an ‘EU’ vision on global health is questionable. Further research is needed on how this impacts on policy implementation. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2017-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5953526/ /pubmed/29764107 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.112 Text en © 2018 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Steurs, Lies Van de Pas, Remco Delputte, Sarah Orbie, Jan The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision? |
title | The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision? |
title_full | The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision? |
title_fullStr | The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision? |
title_full_unstemmed | The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision? |
title_short | The Global Health Policies of the EU and its Member States: A Common Vision? |
title_sort | global health policies of the eu and its member states: a common vision? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5953526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764107 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steurslies theglobalhealthpoliciesoftheeuanditsmemberstatesacommonvision AT vandepasremco theglobalhealthpoliciesoftheeuanditsmemberstatesacommonvision AT delputtesarah theglobalhealthpoliciesoftheeuanditsmemberstatesacommonvision AT orbiejan theglobalhealthpoliciesoftheeuanditsmemberstatesacommonvision AT steurslies globalhealthpoliciesoftheeuanditsmemberstatesacommonvision AT vandepasremco globalhealthpoliciesoftheeuanditsmemberstatesacommonvision AT delputtesarah globalhealthpoliciesoftheeuanditsmemberstatesacommonvision AT orbiejan globalhealthpoliciesoftheeuanditsmemberstatesacommonvision |