Cargando…

First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study

PURPOSE: We assessed the feasibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve (MFR) estimation using dynamic SPECT with a novel CZT camera in patients with stable CAD, in comparison with (15)O–water PET and fractional flow reserve (FFR). METHODS: Thirty patients were prospectively included an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agostini, Denis, Roule, Vincent, Nganoa, Catherine, Roth, Nathaniel, Baavour, Raphael, Parienti, Jean-Jacques, Beygui, Farzin, Manrique, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5953996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3958-7
_version_ 1783323430606602240
author Agostini, Denis
Roule, Vincent
Nganoa, Catherine
Roth, Nathaniel
Baavour, Raphael
Parienti, Jean-Jacques
Beygui, Farzin
Manrique, Alain
author_facet Agostini, Denis
Roule, Vincent
Nganoa, Catherine
Roth, Nathaniel
Baavour, Raphael
Parienti, Jean-Jacques
Beygui, Farzin
Manrique, Alain
author_sort Agostini, Denis
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We assessed the feasibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve (MFR) estimation using dynamic SPECT with a novel CZT camera in patients with stable CAD, in comparison with (15)O–water PET and fractional flow reserve (FFR). METHODS: Thirty patients were prospectively included and underwent FFR measurements in the main coronary arteries (LAD, LCx, RCA). A stenosis ≥50% was considered obstructive and a FFR abnormal if ≤0.8. All patients underwent a dynamic rest/stress (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT and (15)O–water PET for MBF and MFR calculation. Net retention kinetic modeling was applied to SPECT data to estimate global uptake values, and MBF was derived using Leppo correction. Ischemia by PET and CZT-SPECT was considered present if MFR was lower than 2 and 2.1, respectively. RESULTS: CZT-SPECT yielded higher stress and rest MBF compared to PET for global and LAD and LCx territories, but not in RCA territory. MFR was similar in global and each vessel territory for both modalities. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value of CZT-SPECT were, respectively, 83.3, 95.8, 93.3, 100 and 85.7% for the detection of ischemia and 58.3, 84.6, 81.1, 36.8 and 93% for the detection of hemodynamically significant stenosis (FFR ≤ 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT was technically feasible and provided similar MFR compared to (15)O–water PET and high diagnostic value for detecting impaired MFR and abnormal FFR in patients with stable CAD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5953996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59539962018-05-18 First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study Agostini, Denis Roule, Vincent Nganoa, Catherine Roth, Nathaniel Baavour, Raphael Parienti, Jean-Jacques Beygui, Farzin Manrique, Alain Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Original Article PURPOSE: We assessed the feasibility of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve (MFR) estimation using dynamic SPECT with a novel CZT camera in patients with stable CAD, in comparison with (15)O–water PET and fractional flow reserve (FFR). METHODS: Thirty patients were prospectively included and underwent FFR measurements in the main coronary arteries (LAD, LCx, RCA). A stenosis ≥50% was considered obstructive and a FFR abnormal if ≤0.8. All patients underwent a dynamic rest/stress (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT and (15)O–water PET for MBF and MFR calculation. Net retention kinetic modeling was applied to SPECT data to estimate global uptake values, and MBF was derived using Leppo correction. Ischemia by PET and CZT-SPECT was considered present if MFR was lower than 2 and 2.1, respectively. RESULTS: CZT-SPECT yielded higher stress and rest MBF compared to PET for global and LAD and LCx territories, but not in RCA territory. MFR was similar in global and each vessel territory for both modalities. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value of CZT-SPECT were, respectively, 83.3, 95.8, 93.3, 100 and 85.7% for the detection of ischemia and 58.3, 84.6, 81.1, 36.8 and 93% for the detection of hemodynamically significant stenosis (FFR ≤ 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT was technically feasible and provided similar MFR compared to (15)O–water PET and high diagnostic value for detecting impaired MFR and abnormal FFR in patients with stable CAD. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-01 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5953996/ /pubmed/29497801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3958-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agostini, Denis
Roule, Vincent
Nganoa, Catherine
Roth, Nathaniel
Baavour, Raphael
Parienti, Jean-Jacques
Beygui, Farzin
Manrique, Alain
First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study
title First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study
title_full First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study
title_fullStr First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study
title_full_unstemmed First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study
title_short First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)Tc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with (15)O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study
title_sort first validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic (99m)tc-sestamibi czt-spect camera: head to head comparison with (15)o-water pet and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. the waterday study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5953996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497801
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3958-7
work_keys_str_mv AT agostinidenis firstvalidationofmyocardialflowreserveassessedbydynamic99mtcsestamibicztspectcameraheadtoheadcomparisonwith15owaterpetandfractionalflowreserveinpatientswithsuspectedcoronaryarterydiseasethewaterdaystudy
AT roulevincent firstvalidationofmyocardialflowreserveassessedbydynamic99mtcsestamibicztspectcameraheadtoheadcomparisonwith15owaterpetandfractionalflowreserveinpatientswithsuspectedcoronaryarterydiseasethewaterdaystudy
AT nganoacatherine firstvalidationofmyocardialflowreserveassessedbydynamic99mtcsestamibicztspectcameraheadtoheadcomparisonwith15owaterpetandfractionalflowreserveinpatientswithsuspectedcoronaryarterydiseasethewaterdaystudy
AT rothnathaniel firstvalidationofmyocardialflowreserveassessedbydynamic99mtcsestamibicztspectcameraheadtoheadcomparisonwith15owaterpetandfractionalflowreserveinpatientswithsuspectedcoronaryarterydiseasethewaterdaystudy
AT baavourraphael firstvalidationofmyocardialflowreserveassessedbydynamic99mtcsestamibicztspectcameraheadtoheadcomparisonwith15owaterpetandfractionalflowreserveinpatientswithsuspectedcoronaryarterydiseasethewaterdaystudy
AT parientijeanjacques firstvalidationofmyocardialflowreserveassessedbydynamic99mtcsestamibicztspectcameraheadtoheadcomparisonwith15owaterpetandfractionalflowreserveinpatientswithsuspectedcoronaryarterydiseasethewaterdaystudy
AT beyguifarzin firstvalidationofmyocardialflowreserveassessedbydynamic99mtcsestamibicztspectcameraheadtoheadcomparisonwith15owaterpetandfractionalflowreserveinpatientswithsuspectedcoronaryarterydiseasethewaterdaystudy
AT manriquealain firstvalidationofmyocardialflowreserveassessedbydynamic99mtcsestamibicztspectcameraheadtoheadcomparisonwith15owaterpetandfractionalflowreserveinpatientswithsuspectedcoronaryarterydiseasethewaterdaystudy