Cargando…
Experiences with an intra-articular pain catheter in approx. 3.000 TKR over a period of 6.5 years
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal pain treatment after a TKR has been under discussion for a long time. With the use of pain catheters you can save analgesics and opiates. A femoral and sciatic nerve catheter became already established. Disadvantages are a the time-consuming application of the cathet...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5954338/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00015 |
_version_ | 1783323500314886144 |
---|---|
author | Mai, Burkhard |
author_facet | Mai, Burkhard |
author_sort | Mai, Burkhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal pain treatment after a TKR has been under discussion for a long time. With the use of pain catheters you can save analgesics and opiates. A femoral and sciatic nerve catheter became already established. Disadvantages are a the time-consuming application of the catheter with neuro-tracer or ultrasound as well as facing possible palsy, especially of the extension muscle of the knee, which disturbs the autonomous mobility of the patients. Would it be possible to treat the postoperative pain sufficiently and preserve the active mobility of the patients by using an intraarticular pain catheter, that will not influence the muscle power, which can also be used time-sparing during TKR surgeries in combination with an external, continuous local anesthesia from a portable valve-controlled reservoir? MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on case series of our clinic from July 2010 till October 2017, which included more than 3.000 TKRs. We made use of 4 different catheter and pump systems (for example the Painbuster). The LA used was Ropivacaine. RESULTS: With a postoperative rate of fluid flow of 10-15 ml/h in a concentration of 3,75 mg/ml (0,375%) Ropivacaine Hydrochloride over a period of 2-3 days, we achieved a good pain reduction comparable to a femoral catheter and perfusor application of 2,0 mg/ml (0,2%) Ropivacaine. CONCLUSION: Most patients feel strong pain following a TKR due to the special vulnerability of the knee joints with large inner surface of the joint and thin soft-tissue coverage. The established pain catheters positioned beside the femoral nerve need a relative long turnover time (the time from the end of the previous surgical procedure to the beginning of the next) and have an important disadvantage of palsy of the quadriceps muscle with the risk of falling due to the immobilization of the patient. The intra-articular painbuster systems lead to excellent pain reduction and fast mobilization of the patient with full control of muscle power. The application of the catheter during the operation is not time consuming and you will not face longer turnover and surgery times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5954338 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59543382018-05-18 Experiences with an intra-articular pain catheter in approx. 3.000 TKR over a period of 6.5 years Mai, Burkhard Orthop J Sports Med Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal pain treatment after a TKR has been under discussion for a long time. With the use of pain catheters you can save analgesics and opiates. A femoral and sciatic nerve catheter became already established. Disadvantages are a the time-consuming application of the catheter with neuro-tracer or ultrasound as well as facing possible palsy, especially of the extension muscle of the knee, which disturbs the autonomous mobility of the patients. Would it be possible to treat the postoperative pain sufficiently and preserve the active mobility of the patients by using an intraarticular pain catheter, that will not influence the muscle power, which can also be used time-sparing during TKR surgeries in combination with an external, continuous local anesthesia from a portable valve-controlled reservoir? MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report on case series of our clinic from July 2010 till October 2017, which included more than 3.000 TKRs. We made use of 4 different catheter and pump systems (for example the Painbuster). The LA used was Ropivacaine. RESULTS: With a postoperative rate of fluid flow of 10-15 ml/h in a concentration of 3,75 mg/ml (0,375%) Ropivacaine Hydrochloride over a period of 2-3 days, we achieved a good pain reduction comparable to a femoral catheter and perfusor application of 2,0 mg/ml (0,2%) Ropivacaine. CONCLUSION: Most patients feel strong pain following a TKR due to the special vulnerability of the knee joints with large inner surface of the joint and thin soft-tissue coverage. The established pain catheters positioned beside the femoral nerve need a relative long turnover time (the time from the end of the previous surgical procedure to the beginning of the next) and have an important disadvantage of palsy of the quadriceps muscle with the risk of falling due to the immobilization of the patient. The intra-articular painbuster systems lead to excellent pain reduction and fast mobilization of the patient with full control of muscle power. The application of the catheter during the operation is not time consuming and you will not face longer turnover and surgery times. SAGE Publications 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5954338/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00015 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav. |
spellingShingle | Article Mai, Burkhard Experiences with an intra-articular pain catheter in approx. 3.000 TKR over a period of 6.5 years |
title | Experiences with an intra-articular pain catheter in approx. 3.000 TKR over a period of 6.5 years |
title_full | Experiences with an intra-articular pain catheter in approx. 3.000 TKR over a period of 6.5 years |
title_fullStr | Experiences with an intra-articular pain catheter in approx. 3.000 TKR over a period of 6.5 years |
title_full_unstemmed | Experiences with an intra-articular pain catheter in approx. 3.000 TKR over a period of 6.5 years |
title_short | Experiences with an intra-articular pain catheter in approx. 3.000 TKR over a period of 6.5 years |
title_sort | experiences with an intra-articular pain catheter in approx. 3.000 tkr over a period of 6.5 years |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5954338/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118S00015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maiburkhard experienceswithanintraarticularpaincatheterinapprox3000tkroveraperiodof65years |